Or. Admin. Code § 409-060-0120 - Health Evidence Review Commission Process for Evidence-based Reports
(1) The Commission
shall base its reports on scientific evidence, taking into account the strength
of the evidence, including an assessment of any biases present. Meetings shall
be public and conducted in a manner consistent with the Commission's policies
and procedures.
(2) Topics for
review shall be publicly identified at least 28 days prior to the initial
Subcommittee meeting at which a draft evidence-based report is reviewed. In
this notice, the Subcommittee shall make publicly available the primary
evidence source documents to be used in creating the initial draft report,
except when source documents are proprietary. If additional sources are added
to the initial draft report after this notice, the Subcommittee shall publicly
identify them no later than 14 days prior to the Subcommittee meeting where
they will be discussed. In lieu of proprietary source documents, the
Subcommittee shall make publicly available a citation of the evidence source.
In the case of a proprietary evidence source, a full listing of citations from
the proprietary source shall be made available when allowed by the source. If
providing the citations is not allowed or not otherwise feasible, a summary of
the evidence findings will be provided at least 14 days in advance of the
meeting at which the initial draft report will be discussed.
(3) When developing an evidence-based report
other than a coverage guidance, the Commission or its designated Subcommittee
shall consult with two or more ad hoc experts on the subject matter of the
evidence-based report. Subcommittee shall publicly solicit ad hoc experts at
least 28 days prior to the meeting at which it reviews the initial draft
evidence-based report. One of the ad hoc experts must be a provider who manages
patients who would potentially receive the treatment, service or device in
question. Candidates wishing to serve as ad hoc experts shall disclose
conflicts of interest according to HERC bylaws. The Authority shall appoint ad
hoc experts that best meet the needs of the state, considering any conflicts of
interest, and shall not be limited to those who have volunteered to serve.
(4) After the Subcommittee reviews
the initial draft report, the subcommittee may revise the initial draft report.
The Subcommittee shall then solicit public comment on this version of the draft
report over a 30-day period. Draft reports posted for comment shall include
citations for all sources used in developing the report and a summary of
evidence findings. The Subcommittee shall publicly disclose written comments
received during the 30-day period, draft responses and additional revisions (if
any) to the draft report at least seven days before the Subcommittee meeting at
which the Subcommittee reviews public comments. After discussing the available
evidence and considering public comment, including additional verbal testimony,
the Subcommittee shall make conclusions as to the overall importance of
beneficial effects versus potential harms and approve its final draft
evidence-based report reflecting these conclusions.
(5) Before an evidence-based report is
reviewed at a Commission meeting, a final draft report approved by the
Subcommittee, along with all written public comments received during the public
comment period and the Subcommittee's responses to these public comments shall
be made publicly available 14 days prior to the meeting. At the meeting, the
Commission shall consider the Subcommittee's approved draft report and accept
further public comment.
(6) After
evaluating the report and public comments the Commission may take one of three
actions:
(a) Accept the report as written.
(b) Make edits to the report and
accept as modified.
(c) Return the
report to the Subcommittee with recommendations for further work.
(7) The Commission or its
Subcommittees may revise evidence-based reports when additional information
relevant to the report is presented to the Commission or its Subcommittees. The
Commission or its Subcommittees may initiate a review of evidence-based reports
at the request of interested parties who provide information or interpretations
not considered in developing an existing evidence-based report. The Commission
may also elect to retire a coverage guidance based on an assessment of the
importance of the coverage guidance and the resources that would be required to
update it. HERC shall annually solicit requests to revise its coverage
guidances and any requests shall be presented to HERC at a regular meeting
along with the results of staff research on the topic and any recommendations
related to the request.
Notes
Stat. Auth.: ORS 414.695 & 413.042
Stats. Implemented: 414.695 & 414.698
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.