Or. Admin. Code § 410-145-0010 - Application Procedures
(1) The
Oregon Health Sciences University and one or more entities, each of which
operates at least three hospitals in a single urban area in this state, may
apply to the director for approval of a cooperative program.
(2) The application must include all of the
following information, in the order specified:
(a) The names and addresses of each of the
entities to be involved in the cooperative program, with a narrative describing
how each entity meets the eligibility requirements set out in section (1) of
this rule;
(b) A list of the names
of all health care providers who propose to provide heart and kidney transplant
services under the cooperative program, together with appropriate evidence of
compliance with any licensing or certification requirements for those health
care providers to practice in this state. The services to be provided by each
provider and the location where these services are to be provided should be
identified. In the case of employed physicians, the list and the information to
be submitted may be limited to the employer or organizational unit of the
employer;
(c) A description of the
activities to be conducted by the cooperative program;
(d) A description of proposed anticompetitive
practices listed in paragraphs (A) through (E) of this subsection, any
practices that the parties anticipate will have significant anticompetitive
effects and a description of practices of the cooperative program affecting
costs, prices, personnel positions, capital expenditures and allocation of
resources. As provided in ORS
442.715(1),
practices which may be authorized by an order issued under this rule include:
(A) Setting prices for heart and kidney
transplants and all services directly related to heart and kidney
transplants;
(B) Refusing to deal
with competitors in the heart and kidney transplant market;
(C) Allocating product, service, geographic
and patient markets directly relating to heart and kidney
transplants;
(D) Acquiring and
maintaining a monopoly in heart and kidney transplant services; and
(E) Engaging in other activities that might
give rise to liability under ORS
646.705 - ORS
646.836 or federal antitrust
laws.
(e) A list of the
goals identified in paragraphs (A) through (H) of this subsection that the
cooperative agreement expects to achieve, together with an explanation,
including documentation as necessary, of the way in which such goals will be
achieved and the anticipated time schedule for meeting these goals. The phrase
"Reduction of, or protection against", as used in paragraphs (A), (B) and (D)
of this subsection, means that the applicants have two options for
demonstrating accomplishment of these goals. The application may compare the
projected results for the cooperative program to the existing situation, in
which case a reduction in price, cost and duplication of resources compared to
present conditions must be demonstrated. Alternatively, the application may
compare the projected results for the cooperative program to the situation that
would have existed if there were separate, competing transplant programs. In
this latter case, the application must demonstrate that the proposed
cooperative program will result in protection against the rising costs, rising
prices and duplication of resources that might result if there were competing
programs. As provided in ORS
442.705(2),
goals which might be achieved through cooperative transplant programs include:
(A) Reduction of, or protection against,
rising costs of heart and kidney transplant services;
(B) Reduction of, or protection against,
rising prices for heart and kidney transplant services;
(C) Improvement or maintenance of the quality
of heart and kidney transplant services provided in this state;
(D) Reduction of, or protection against,
duplication of resources including, without limitation, expensive medical
specialists, medical equipment and sites of service;
(E) Improvement or maintenance of efficiency
in the delivery of heart and kidney transplant services;
(F) Improvement or maintenance of public
access to heart and kidney transplant services;
(G) Increase in donations of organs for
transplantation; and
(H)
Improvement in the continuity of patient care.
(f) A description of the proposed places and
manner of providing heart and kidney transplant services and services related
to heart and kidney transplants under the cooperative program. This description
should include a discussion of whether service sites have or will receive
membership in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). If the cooperative
program will not initially include both heart and kidney transplant services,
the application shall identify which services will not initially be included,
and will describe what will be done by the parties to work towards inclusion of
such services in the future. The application must describe the ongoing efforts
being made and any planned efforts for including both heart and kidney
transplant services in the cooperative program;
(g) Projections of the number of heart
transplants and the number of kidney transplants which the cooperative program
expects to perform in each of its first three years of operation. These
projections should be accompanied by a discussion of the methodology by which
they were derived. A description of the expected service area(s) for the
cooperative program's services should also be included;
(h) If the application claims that the
program will achieve the goal in paragraph (e)(G) of this section, or if the
application projects an increase in the total number of heart or kidney
transplants in the state, the application should discuss how donor organ
availability would change as a result of the cooperative program's operations,
and explain the reasons why such changes are anticipated;
(i) If the applicants intend to demonstrate
that the cooperative program will result in a reduction of costs, prices and
duplication of resources compared to present conditions, the application must
include a budget for the most recently completed fiscal year for each existing
heart and kidney transplant program, as well as a proposed budget for operating
the cooperative program for its first three years. The budget for the
cooperative program must account for all applicable services listed in OAR
410-145-0000(2).
Both the budgets for existing programs and the projected budget for the
proposed cooperative program must include the following information:
(A) Gross revenues;
(B) Direct expenses, including a breakdown
into salaries, payroll taxes and fringe benefits, any compensation to
physicians to be paid by the program, supplies, bad debts, depreciation and
interest, and other direct expenses;
(C) Indirect expenses, identified by
categories which should include operation and maintenance of plant,
housekeeping, billing, insurance, another indirect expenses;
(D) Deductions from revenue by component,
including charity care;
(E) Net
operating income (or loss) after the allocation of indirect expenses from
non-revenue producing departments;
(F) Anticipated gross and net operating
revenue per case for heart transplants and for kidney transplants;
(G) If either existing programs or the
proposed cooperative programs charge or anticipate charging any flat fees for
any transplant services, the amount of such fees (projected for the first three
years of operation, in the case of the cooperative program);
(H) For the cooperative program only, any
proposed capital expenditures; and
(I) Projected cost savings or cost increases
to the health care system of the proposed cooperative program, compared to the
costs of existing transplant services.
(j) If the applicants intend to demonstrate
that the cooperative program will result in protection against rising costs,
rising prices and duplication of resources compared to the situation that would
have existed if there were separate, competing transplant programs, the
application must include a proposed budget for operating the cooperative
program for its first three years. This budget must account for all applicable
services listed in OAR
410-145-0000(2)
which will be delivered at a new transplant program site, and for all new
services which will be delivered through the cooperative program at an existing
site. The budget must also separately account for any existing services that
will be included in or provide support to the cooperative program, but the
application may provide a lesser level of detail for the budget information on
existing services. The applicant must also provide a projected three year
budget for new transplant service sites and associated support services,
showing what would occur if the services proposed to be delivered by the
cooperative program were to be delivered through separate, competing programs.
Both the cooperative program budget and the hypothetical budget for a competing
program must include the following information:
(A) Gross revenues;
(B) Direct expenses (for services provided
through a new transplant program site or for new services at an existing site,
include a breakdown into salaries, payroll taxes and fringe benefits, any
compensation to physicians to be paid by the program, supplies, bad debts,
depreciation and interest, and other direct expenses);
(C) Indirect expenses (for services provided
through a new transplant program site or for new services at an existing site,
identified by categories which should include operation and maintenance of
plant, housekeeping, billing, insurance, and other indirect
expenses);
(D) Deductions from
revenue (for services provided through a new transplant program site or for new
services at an existing site, deductions should be broken out by component,
including charity care);
(E) Net
operating income (or loss) after the allocation of indirect expenses from
non-revenue producing departments;
(F) Anticipated gross and net operating
revenue per case for heart transplants and for kidney transplants;
(G) If it is anticipated that either the
cooperative or competitive program would charge any flat fees for any
transplant services, a projection of such fees for the first three years of
operation;
(H) For services
provided through a new transplant site or for new services at an existing site,
any proposed capital expenditures; and
(I) Projected cost savings or cost increases
to the health care system of cooperative vs. competitive programs for
transplant services.
(k)
Satisfactory evidence of financial ability to deliver heart and kidney
transplant services in accordance with the cooperative program. Such evidence
shall include:
(A) Financial statements for
each party to the application for each of the three previous years;
(B) The anticipated sources or reimbursement
for heart transplants and sources of reimbursement for kidney transplants
during the first three years of cooperative program operations. The application
should discuss whether the cooperative program anticipates receiving Medicare
certification for any proposed new heart and kidney transplant sites and, if
so, when such certification is expected. The application should also discuss
any existing or anticipated contractual agreements with third party payers
regarding cooperative program services, and any anticipated modifications of
existing contractual agreements concerning cooperative program services between
parties to the cooperative agreement and third party payers.
(l) The agreement that establishes
the cooperative program and policies that shall govern it.
(3) A joint application must be submitted on
behalf of all parties to the proposed cooperative agreement. Four copies of the
application shall be submitted to the Office of the Director, Oregon Health
Authority, Human Services Building, Salem, Oregon 97310. The application must
be accompanied by an application fee of $30,000. Checks should be made payable
to the Oregon Health Authority.
(4)
An application shall be considered filed as of the date that a complete
application is received by the director. A complete application must meet all
the requirements of sections (2) and (3) of this rule. Within 14 days of the
receipt of an application, the director shall determine whether the application
is complete, and notify the applicants if the application is complete or
incomplete. If the application is incomplete, this notification shall include a
detailed description of the additional information that is needed. The
applicants may provide the additional information requested to make the
application complete, or the applicants may elect to proceed with the review
process without providing this information. The applicants should notify the
director of their choice in this matter in writing within seven days of the
director's finding in regard to completeness. If the applicants elect to submit
additional information, the notification to the director should include an
acknowledgment by the applicants that the application as originally submitted
was incomplete. If such notification and acknowledgment is not received by the
director within seven days, it will be assumed that the applicants do no intend
to submit additional information and wish to proceed immediately with the
review. If the applicants elect to provide the additional information
requested, a complete application shall not be considered to have been
submitted until such information is received by the director. If the applicants
elect not to provide such information, a complete application will be
considered to have been submitted as of the date that the initial application
was received by the director. In such an instance, however, the director may
make negative findings concerning any areas that were found to be
incomplete.
(5) The director shall
review the application in accordance with the provisions of this rule and shall
grant, deny or request modification of the application within 90 days of the
date the application is filed. The director shall hold one or more public
hearings on the application, which shall conclude no later than 80 days after
the date the application is filed. Hearings shall be held in the applicants'
urban area. At least 14 days notice of any hearing will be provided. Notice of
hearings shall be provided to the applicants; to all other hospitals located in
the applicant's urban area(s); to all wire services, daily newspapers and TV
stations serving the state; and to any other persons who have requested notice
of such hearings or who the director believes may have any interest in such
hearings. The decision of the director shall be considered an order in a
contested case for the purposes of ORS
183.310 to
183.550.
(6) The director shall approve an application
made under this rule after:
(a) The
applicants have demonstrated they will achieve at least six of the goals of
subsection (2)(e) of this rule, including at least the goals listed in
paragraphs (2)(e)(A) to (2)(e)(D); and
(b) The director has reviewed and approved
the specifics of the anticompetitive activity expected to be conducted by the
cooperative program.
(7)
In evaluating the application, the director shall consider whether a
cooperative program will contribute to or detract from achieving the goals
listed under subsection (2)(e) of this rule. The director may weigh goals
relating to circumstances that are likely to occur without the cooperative
program, and relating to existing circumstances. The director may also consider
whether any alternative arrangements would be less restrictive of completion
while achieving the same goals.
(8)
An order approving a cooperative program shall identify and define the limits
of the permitted activities for the purposes of granting antitrust immunity
under ORS 442.700 to
442.760.
(9) An order approving a cooperative program
shall include:
(a) Approval of specific
activities listed in subsection (2)(d) of this rule;
(b) Approval of activities the director
anticipates will have substantial anticompetitive effects;
(c) Approval of the proposed budget of the
cooperative program;
(d) The goals
listed in subsection (2)(e) of this rule that the cooperative program is
expected to achieve; and
(e)
Approval of the cooperative program as described in the application and a
finding that the cooperative program is in the public interest.
(10) An order denying the
application for a cooperative program shall identify the findings of fact and
reasons supporting denial.
(11)
Either the director or all parties to the cooperative program may request an
modification of an application made under this section. A request for a
modification shall result in one extension of 30 days after submission of the
modified application. The director shall issue an order under this section
within 30 days after receipt of the modified application.
Notes
Stat. Auth.: ORS413.042, 442.705, ORS 442.710, ORS 441.715& ORS 442.755
Stats. Implemented: ORS 413.042
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.