Or. Admin. Code § 413-115-0130 - Standards of Evidence and Minimum Qualifications for a Qualified Expert Witness
(1)
Preponderance of the Evidence. Emergency removals. When
requesting court authorization for emergency removal at a
shelter hearing, the Department must demonstrate to the court
that the Department has complied with
ORICWA Notice requirements, that removal of
the Indian child or ward is in the Indian
child's best interest, and that a preponderance of the evidence
indicates that protective custody is necessary to prevent imminent
physical damage or harm to the Indian
child.
(2) Clear and
Convincing.
(a)
Foster care
placement. Except during an emergency proceeding,
when requesting court authorization for the placement of an Indian
child in foster care, the Department must
demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that continued custody of the
Indian child with the parent or
Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or
physical damage to the Indian child. The
Department's presentation of evidence must include the
testimony of at least one QEW, as defined in section (3) of this
rule.
(b) Durable
Guardianship finalization pursuant to ORS
419B.366. When requesting court
appointment of a guardian pursuant toORS
419B.366, the
Department must demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence,
that continued custody of the Indian child
with the parent or Indian custodian is likely
to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the Indian
child. The Department's presentation of evidence must
include the testimony of at least one QEW, as defined in section (3) of this
rule.
(3) Beyond a
Reasonable Doubt.
(a) Permanent
Guardianship finalization pursuant to ORS
419B.365. When requesting court
appointment of a guardian pursuant to ORS
419B.365, the
Department must demonstrate, by evidence beyond a reasonable
doubt, that continued custody of theIndian
child with the parent or Indian
custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage
to the Indian child. The Department's
presentation of evidence must include the testimony of at least one QEW, as
defined in section (3) of this rule.
(b)
Termination of parental
rights. When requesting judicial termination of parental
rights, the Department must prove, beyond a
reasonable doubt, that continued custody of the Indian
child by the parent or Indian
custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage
to the Indian child, and that active efforts to reunite the
Indian family did not eliminate the necessity for termination
based on serious emotional or physical damage to the Indian
child. The Department's presentation of evidence must
include the testimony of at least one QEW, as defined in
section (3) of this rule.
(4)
Qualified expert witness
(QEW).
(a) A
QEW must be qualified to testify regarding:
(A) Whether the Indian
child's continued custody by the Indian
child's parent or Indian custodian
is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the
Indian child; and
(B) The prevailing social and cultural
standards and child rearing practices of the Indian
child's tribe.
(b) The Department must work
with the Indian child's tribe to determine who should be
designated to testify as a QEW. If the Indian child's tribe
declines or is unable to designate a QEW, the following
individuals, in order of priority, may testify as a qualified expert
witness:
(A) A
member of the Indian child's tribe or another
person of the tribe's choice who is recognized by the tribe as knowledgeable of
tribal customs regarding family organization, extensive knowledge of prevailing
social and cultural standards and child rearing
practices;
(B) A person having
substantial experience in the delivery of child and family
services to Indians and extensive knowledge of prevailing
social and cultural standards and child rearing practices
within the Indian child's tribe; or
(C) Any person having substantial experience
in the delivery of child and family services to
Indians and knowledge of prevailing social and cultural
standards and child rearing practices in Indian
tribes with cultural similarities to the child's
tribe.
(c)
Department staff may not serve as a QEW in any child
custody proceeding.
Notes
Statutory/Other Authority: ORS 418.005 & ORS 409.050
Statutes/Other Implemented: ORS 418.005, ORS 419B.185, ORS 419B.365, ORS 419B.366 & ORS 419B.521
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.