The contextualized housing need is an analysis relating a
city's allocated housing need and housing production target, as provided in ORS
184.451 to 184.455 and OAR 660-008-0045(7), to local qualitative and
quantitative information. This analysis uses current and future housing needs,
along with population and market trends, to evaluate fair housing choice and
identify fair housing issues in the city to affirmatively further fair housing.
A city must work interdepartmentally to the extent possible in developing and
implementing its contextualized housing need, including but not limited to
collaboration across the planning, permitting, and community development
departments. The analysis must include consideration of protected classes and
named communities in needed housing as provided in ORS 197A.018, with
particular focus on communities of color, low-income communities, individuals
with disabilities, and tribal communities.
The output of the analysis is a determination of the needed
types, characteristics, and locations of housing that a city must plan for in
its six- or eight-year housing capacity and production cycle in order to
mitigate and remedy the identified fair housing issues in furtherance of fair
housing choice. Subsequent housing capacity analyses and any land use
efficiency measures taken, as well as the housing production strategy and all
actions therein, must respond to the identified needed housing types and
locations, and characteristics as applicable, as determined by this
contextualized housing need. To the extent it exists, a city may utilize
information, data, and analyses from other housing planning efforts completed
in the last five years within the city including, but not limited to, equity
analyses and other reports conducted under OAR chapter 660, division 12 and
consolidated plans for any of the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD)'s Community Planning and Development formula grant programs
including Community Development Block Grant Entitlement Communities.
(1) At a minimum, the contextualized housing
need must include:
(a) An affordability
analysis including at a minimum a review of market conditions affecting the
provision of needed housing including existing and expected barriers to the
development of needed housing;
(b)
An analysis of past discriminatory actions or practices related to land and
housing access including, as practicable given information and resource
availability, mapping of the geographies impacted by these actions and
comparing those geographies' relationship to current patterns of segregation as
well as affluence and poverty as illustrated in the housing equity indicators.
Once initially completed, a city must update the past discriminatory actions
analysis for future housing capacity analysis and housing production strategy
cycles, incorporating new information and resources and in comparison to
current conditions; and
(c) An
analysis of fair housing choice across the following issue areas for
communities of color, low-income communities, individuals with disabilities,
and tribal communities that concludes with the identification and evaluation of
fair housing issues within a city.
(A) Housing
tenure and wealth building opportunities;
(B) Permanent housing to resolve
homelessness;
(C) Accessible and
adaptable housing;
(D) Access to
community assets and mitigation of exposure to harms;
(E) Housing stability, anti-displacement and
displacement mitigation;
(F)
Addressing and disrupting patterns of segregation, and their correlation with
concentrated areas of affluence and poverty;
(G) Any issue areas the city is required to
address in other requirements or regulations, including cities subject to OAR
660-012-0315(1) and cities within Metro with Region 2040 centers, as defined in
OAR
660-012-0005(24); and
(H) Any
other issue areas that appear to exist based on occurrences of disparate
housing needs in a city across protected classes and named communities in
needed housing as provided in ORS 197A.018;
(d) If a city concludes that there are no
fair housing issues in one or more of the identified fair housing issue areas
listed in subsection (c), a detailed justification for this conclusion. This
justification must include:
(A) A
comprehensive analysis from subsection (c) that demonstrates the absence of
disparate housing needs or barriers in the issue area(s) and the presence of
housing choice and stability for all community members, and
(B) A plan for ongoing monitoring to ensure
that fair housing issues do not emerge in the future, including a commitment to
re-evaluate the issue area(s) in subsequent contextualized housing need
analyses and housing production strategy adoptions.
(e) Description and identification of the
housing types, characteristics, and locations needed to:
(A) Remedy, or mitigate the fair housing
issues identified in subsection (c) in order to achieve fair housing choice,
and
(B) Meet the city's housing
production target while affirmatively furthering fair housing; and
(f) For cities subject to OAR
660-012-0310, the number of housing units needed for the city to make
proportionate progress towards accommodating 30 percent of all housing in
climate-friendly areas in pursuit of the greenhouse gas emissions reduction
targets as provided in OAR
660-044-0020 and OAR
660-044-0025, including
affordable and accessible units. Cities with additional residential mixed-use
zones may also report on housing development in those areas, and may evaluate
the relative success of measures supporting housing development in both
areas.
(2) The
contextualized housing need must be informed at a minimum by the following
information:
(a) The housing production
dashboard;
(b) The housing equity
indicators including socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of
households living in existing needed housing; and
(c) Equitable engagement as provided in
section (5); and
(d) Any statewide,
regionally, or locally applicable information provided in section
(3).
(3) The department
may host a repository of information organized by state and regional
applicability for use in the contextualized housing need. The department may
update this repository as new information is available and obsolete or outdated
information needs to be removed. Any information in this repository shall be
considered to be "available" for the purposes of section (4).
(4) The contextualized housing need must be
informed by the additional information listed in this section as it is
available and recent within the last five years. One way that additional
information may be deemed to be available under this section is if it is listed
in the department-hosted repository as provided in section (3).
(a) The State of Oregon Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice;
(b) An estimate of quantified housing need by
the state, regional, local, or tribal government for individuals experiencing
homelessness, protected classes, named communities in needed housing as
provided in ORS 197A.018, and tribal communities;
(c) The HUD Annual Homelessness Assessment
Report;
(d) The applicable HUD
Point-in-Time count conducted by the Continuum of Care that the city is located
within;
(e) The applicable
McKinney-Vento Homeless Student Data for all school districts that overlap with
the city boundary;
(f) Fair housing
complaint data from federal, state, or local agencies;
(g) Rental and homeowner vacancy
rates;
(h) Change in gross or net
property values or rent over time;
(i) Data collected by local coordinated care
organizations;
(j) Data collected
by the Community Action Partnership of Oregon and its community action
agencies;
(k) Trends that may
negatively impact preservation of affordable naturally occurring market-rate
units, such as redevelopment rates and changes in market conditions;
(l) A comprehensive inventory of existing
housing units by housing types, characteristics, and locations; and
(m) Data from organizations that advocate on
behalf of protected classes, named communities in needed housing as provided in
ORS 197A.018, low-income communities, and tribal communities.
(5) The contextualized housing
need must be informed by equitable engagement feedback that prioritizes and
actively seeks to center communities of color, low-income communities,
individuals with disabilities, and tribal communities, to ensure these
perspectives are meaningfully incorporated.
(a) In compiling existing engagement feedback
for use in this section, to the extent it exists a city must utilize feedback
from other housing-related engagement within the city conducted within the last
five years including, but not limited to, consolidated plans for any of HUD's
Community Planning and Development formula grant programs including Community
Development Block Grant Entitlement Communities, transportation system plan
updates under OAR
660-012-0120 through
660-012-0135, and public engagement for
severely rent burdened households as defined in OAR
813-112-0010. Except for
the requirement to center tribal communities by coordinating and consulting
with tribes, if the city has comprehensive housing-related engagement feedback
completed within the last five years that sufficiently informs the
contextualized housing need requirements and the city finds that additional
equitable engagement would not align with best practices in the Equitable
Engagement Toolkit, the city may rely entirely on existing engagement feedback
and must include an explanation for this determination in the equitable
engagement summary.
(b) If the city
does not have comprehensive housing-related engagement feedback completed
within the last five years that sufficiently informs the contextualized housing
need requirements provided in section (1), a city must solicit direct feedback
regarding all required analysis as provided in section (1) for which it does
not have recent feedback. A city may refer to the department's Equitable
Engagement Toolkit or OAR
660-012-0130 to employ best practices regarding
equitable engagement.
(c) A city
must provide an equitable engagement summary as part of its contextualized
housing need. The equitable engagement summary must include:
(A) A list and description of the types of
interested parties and communities who comprise community members of needed
housing including protected classes and named communities in needed housing as
provided in ORS 197A.018, especially with regard to communities of color,
low-income communities, individuals with disabilities, and tribal
communities;
(B) As of the
initiation of the contextualized housing need or later, the most recent list of
tribes with ancestral connection to land within the city's jurisdiction or
approved expansion areas from the Oregon Legislative Commission on Indian
Services, and engagement with tribal communities is required through direct
communication with all such identified tribes. A city satisfies the engagement
requirement to center tribal communities in this rule when:
(i) Notice has been made to all tribes as
identified in paragraph (B) by inviting government-to-government consultation
and staff coordination in the development of the city's contextualized housing
need, and
(ii) Follow up
communication, consultation, and coordination as requested by the tribes
regarding the contextualized housing need is complete.
(C) A summary of how the city engaged
interested parties, communities, and tribes identified in paragraphs (A) and
(B), including why they were engaged, engagement methods used, a list of each
engagement effort or event being used to develop the contextualized housing
need, and the interested parties, communities, or tribes identified in
paragraph (A) or (B) who the city believes may still be underrepresented in
this process;
(D) A summary of
feedback received from each engagement effort or event, as well as a
description of the major feedback themes attributed to the interested parties,
communities, and tribes identified in paragraphs (A) and (B). A city must
determine whether each major feedback theme either influenced the
identification of fair housing issues and determination of the needed housing
types, characteristics, and locations in the city in alignment with program
principles or not. If a major feedback theme influenced these determinations,
the specific fair housing issues or needed housing types, characteristics, and
locations identified as a result of the feedback must be documented. If a major
feedback theme did not influence the identification of specific fair housing
issues or determination of needed housing types, characteristics, or locations;
the city must provide a rationale explaining why.
(E) An evaluation of how to improve equitable
engagement practices for future housing engagement efforts conducted by the
city, including but not limited to affirmatively furthering fair housing and
tribal coordination and consultation.