Or. Admin. Code § 731-005-0670 - Rejection of an Offer
(1)
Rejection of an Offer.
(a) ODOT may reject any
Offer upon finding that to accept the Offer may impair the integrity of the
procurement process or that rejecting the Offer is in the public
interest.
(b) ODOT shall reject an
Offer upon ODOT's finding that the Offer:
(A)
Is contingent upon ODOT's acceptance of terms and conditions (including
Specifications) that differ from the Solicitation Document;
(B) Takes exception to terms and conditions
(including Specifications);
(C)
Attempts to prevent public disclosure of matters in contravention of the terms
and conditions of Solicitation Document or in contravention of applicable
law;
(D) Offers Work or goods that
fail to meet the Specifications of the Solicitation Document;
(E) Is late;
(F) Is not in substantial compliance with the
Solicitation Documents; or
(G) Is
not in substantial compliance with all prescribed public solicitation
procedures.
(c) ODOT
shall reject an Offer upon ODOT's finding that the Offeror:
(A) Has not been prequalified as required as
set forth in OAR Chapter 731, Division 7, the Offeror's prequalification
application is not received at ODOT's address shown in the prequalification
application at least 10 days prior to bid opening, the Offeror is not
prequalified in the class(es) of work designated in the special provisions, or
the Offeror's prequalification is not otherwise approved by ODOT;
(B) Has been Disqualified;
(C) Has been declared ineligible under ORS
279C.860 by the Commissioner of
Bureau of Labor and Industries has declared and the Contract is for a Public
Work;
(D) Is listed as not
qualified by the Construction Contractors Board;
(E) Has not met the requirements of ORS
279A.105 if required by the
Solicitation Document;
(F) Has not
submitted properly executed Bid security as required by the Solicitation
Document;
(G) Has failed to provide
the certification required under section (3) of this rule; or
(H) Is nonresponsible. Offerors are required
to demonstrate their ability to perform satisfactorily under a Contract. Before
awarding a Contract, ODOT must have information that indicates that the Offeror
meets the applicable standards of responsibility. To be a Responsible Offeror,
ODOT must determine that the Offeror:
(i) Has
available the appropriate financial, material, equipment, facility and
personnel resources and expertise, or ability to obtain the resources and
expertise, necessary to demonstrate the capability of the Offeror to meet all
contractual responsibilities;
(ii)
Has completed previous contracts of a similar nature with a satisfactory record
of performance. A satisfactory record of performance means that to the extent
the costs associated with and time available to perform a previous contract
were within the Offeror's control, the Offeror stayed within the time and
budget allotted for the procurement and otherwise performed the contract in a
satisfactory manner. ODOT should carefully scrutinize an Offeror's record of
Contract performance if the Offeror is or recently has been materially
deficient in Contract performance. In reviewing the Offeror's performance, ODOT
should determine whether the Offeror's deficient performance was expressly
excused under the terms of Contract, or whether the Offeror took appropriate
corrective action. ODOT may review the Offeror's performance on both private
and public Contracts in determining the Offeror's record of Contract
performance. ODOT shall make its basis for determining an Offeror
nonresponsible under this paragraph part of the solicitation file;
(iii) Has a satisfactory record of integrity.
An Offeror may lack integrity if ODOT determines the Offeror demonstrates a
lack of business ethics such as violation of state environmental laws or false
certifications made to ODOT. ODOT may find an Offeror nonresponsible based on
the lack of integrity of any Entity having influence or control over the
Offeror (such as a key employee of the Offeror that has the authority to
significantly influence the Offeror's performance of the Contract or a parent
company, predecessor or successor Entity). ODOT may find an Offeror
nonresponsible based on previous convictions of offenses related to obtaining
or attempting to obtain a Contract or subcontract or in connection with the
Offeror's performance of a contract or subcontract. The standards for Conduct
Disqualification under OAR
731-005-0710 may be used to
determine an Offeror's integrity. ODOT shall make its basis for determining
that an Offeror is nonresponsible under this paragraph part of the solicitation
file;
(iv) Is legally qualified to
Contract with ODOT; and
(v) Has
supplied all necessary information in connection with the inquiry concerning
responsibility. If the Offeror fails to promptly supply information requested
by ODOT concerning responsibility, ODOT shall base the determination of
responsibility upon any available information, or may find the Offeror
nonresponsible.
(2) Form of Business Entity. For purposes of
this rule, ODOT may investigate any Entity submitting an Offer. The
investigation may include that Entity's officers, directors, owners,
affiliates, or any other Entity acquiring ownership of the Entity to determine
application of this rule or to apply the disqualification provisions of ORS
279C.440 to
279C.450 and OAR
731-005-0710.
(3) Certification of Non-Discrimination. The
Offeror shall certify and deliver to ODOT Written certification, as part of the
Offer, that the Offeror has not discriminated against minority, women or
emerging small business enterprises or against a business enterprise that is
owned or controlled by or that employs a disabled veteran as defined in ORS
408.225 in obtaining any
required subcontracts.
Notes
Statutory/Other Authority: ORS 184.619, 279A.050 & 279A.065
Statutes/Other Implemented: ORS 279A.105, 279A.110, 279C.375 & 279C.395
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.