Or. Admin. Code § 731-148-0230 - Ties Among Proposers
(1) If ODOT is
selecting a Consultant on the basis of qualifications alone and determines
after the ranking of Proposers that two or more Proposers are equally
qualified, ODOT may select a candidate through any process that ODOT believes
will result in the best value for ODOT taking into account the scope,
complexity and nature of the Architectural, Engineering, Photogrammetric
Mapping, Transportation Planning or Land Surveying Services. Provided, however,
the tie breaking process established by ODOT under this section (1) cannot be
based on the Consultant's pricing policies, pricing proposals or other pricing
information, including the number of hours proposed for the services required,
expenses, hourly rates, and overhead. The process must be designed to instill
public confidence through ethical and fair dealing, honesty and good faith on
the part of ODOT and Proposers and shall protect the integrity of the Public
Contracting process. Once a tie is broken, ODOT and the selected Proposer shall
proceed with negotiations under OAR
731-148-0200(3),
731-148-0205(4),
731-148-0210(4)
or 731-148-0220(3)(d),
as applicable.
(2) If ODOT is
selecting a Consultant on the basis of price alone, or on the basis of price
and qualifications, and determines after the ranking of Proposers that two or
more Proposers are identical in terms of price or are identical in terms of
price and qualifications, then ODOT shall follow the procedure set forth in OAR
137-046-0300 (Preferences for
Oregon Goods and Services) to select the Consultant.
Notes
Statutory/Other Authority: ORS 184.619, 279A.065(6)(a) & 279A.070
Statutes/Other Implemented: ORS 279A.050(3) & 279C.110
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.