49 Pa. Code § 16.55 - Complaint process
(a) A person
may submit a written complaint to the complaints office alleging a violation of
the act or this chapter or Chapter 17 or 18 (relating to State Board of
Medicine-medical doctors; and State Board of Medicine-practitioners other than
medical doctors), specifying the grounds therefore.
(b) The complaints office will assign a
complaint to the prosecution and investigatory staff who, together with medical
consultants as may be required, will make a determination that the complaint
merits consideration. The Board prosecutor will cause to be conducted
reasonable inquiry or investigation that is deemed necessary to determine the
truth and validity of the allegations in the complaint. The Board prosecutor
will provide reports to the Board at its regular meetings on the number,
nature, procedure and handling of the complaints received.
(c) Upon review of the complaint,
documentation, records and other materials obtained during the course of an
investigation, the Board prosecutor will determine whether to initiate the
filing of formal charges. The documents, materials or information obtained
during the course of an investigation shall be confidential and privileged
unless admitted as evidence during the course of a formal disciplinary
proceeding. A person who has investigated or has access to or custody of
documents, materials or information which are confidential and privileged under
this subsection will not be required to testify in any judicial or
administrative proceeding without the written consent of the Board.
(d) The Board prosecutor may enter into
negotiations at any stage of the complaint, investigation or hearing process to
settle the case by consent agreement.
(1)
Consent agreements must be approved as to form and legality by the Office of
General Counsel and adopted by the Board.
(2) Until the Board approves a consent
agreement, the terms of the agreement are confidential.
(3) Admissions made by a respondent during
the course of negotiations may not be used against the respondent in any formal
disciplinary proceeding if a consent agreement cannot be reached.
(4) Admissions made by a respondent in a
consent agreement that is ultimately rejected by the Board may not be used
against the respondent in any formal disciplinary proceeding.
(5) This subsection does not preclude the
Board prosecutor from offering, at a formal disciplinary hearing, other
evidence to prove factual matters disclosed during the negotiation
process.
Notes
The provisions of this § 16.55 issued under sections 8 and 9 of the Medical Practice Act of 1985 (63 P. S. §§ 422.8 and 422.9).
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.