52 Pa. Code § 69.201 - General
(a) Since
66 Pa.C.S. §
1307
(relating to sliding scale of rates; adjustments) enables a utility to collect
certain fuel costs on a dollar-for-dollar basis from its ratepayers, a utility
has the highest degree of responsibility to take aggressive action on behalf of
its ratepayers to control nuclear fuel costs. A utility should use every means
reasonably available to monitor and enforce vendor adherence to all aspects of
nuclear fuel procurement agreements. In addition to contract adherence, the
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) may exercise its
independent right to review each utility's purchasing practices, which may
include a review to determine if the utility is actively making every effort to
secure competitive sources for every phase of the nuclear fuel cycle and is
obtaining its nuclear fuel at the lowest reasonable cost. The Commission
defines "lowest reasonable cost," relating to nuclear fuel procurement, as
contracting for or purchasing nuclear fuel at the lowest available price
without sacrificing dependability or quality of service. The Commission may
make constructive suggestions with regard to an individual company's nuclear
fuel procurement policies and procedures from time to time. As the process of
acquiring nuclear fuel is somewhat more complex than fossil fuel, an
explanation has been included to describe in general terms the elements of the
nuclear fuel procurement process.
(b) The purpose of §
§
69.202-69.206 is to establish guidelines
that the Commission recommends an electric utility follow in its nuclear fuel
procurement activities. The Commission realizes that nuclear fuel procurement
policies of utilities may differ depending on individual circumstances. The
Commission believes that there are certain common practices that will result in
the lowest rea sonable nuclear fuel costs. Nuclear fuel procurement should be
consistent with regulatory requirements, and may or may not result in the
lowest priced nuclear fuel.
(c) If
a utility believes that a nuclear fuel procurement policy that differs from
that described in §
§
69.202-69.206 will, in the long term,
result in lower costs, the utility should submit the details of the policy for
review by the Commission prior to implementation.
(d) If it appears through Commission review,
that nuclear fuel procurement practices which differ from those described in
this section and §
§
69.202-69.207 have resulted in
unreasonable nuclear fuel costs, a utility may be requested by the Commission
to demonstrate the reasonableness of the costs.
(e) If the Commission determines after notice
and hearing that a utility's nuclear fuel procurement practices which differ
from those described in this section and §
§
69.202-69.207 have resulted in
unreasonable nuclear fuel costs, the utility will be required to apply credits
against the applicable energy cost rate or to make refunds to its
customers.
(f) Specifications for
the procurement of nuclear fuel should not be set at quantity levels which
would preclude competitive proposals from reliable and competent suppliers.
Investigations should be conducted to insure that potential vendors have
adequate owned or contracted supplies to fulfill all contract
provisions.
(g) Sections
69.202-69.206 represent the standard by
which the Commission intends to assess the reasonableness of a utility's
nuclear fuel purchasing policies and practices. Sections
69.202-69.206 serve as notice to electric
utilities of the Commission's expectations with regard to nuclear fuel
procurement policies and practices. Utilities should apply §
§
69.202-69.206 prospectively in planning
nuclear fuel purchases. If provisions of existing contracts are in conflict
with §
§
69.202-69.206, utilities need not seek to
immediately amend the contracts, but should move towards the policies in §
§
69.202-69.206 as contracts are modified,
renegotiated or extended. Prior imprudent activities are not deemed to be
exonerated with the promulgation of this section.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.