Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 1500-01-02-.02 - INVESTIGATION AND CONCILIATION
(1) Investigation.
After the filing of a complaint, the Executive Director or a subordinate
supervisor designated by him or her shall designate an investigator from the
Commission staff or from a group of approved contract investigators to
investigate the complaint. The Chairman may at his or her discretion designate
a Commissioner to direct the investigation as chief investigator. The
designated investigator(s) shall make a prompt and thorough investigation of
the allegations of the complaint.
(2) Production of evidence:
(a) An investigator may at any reasonable
time request production of or access to premises, records, and documents
relevant to the complaint.
(b) If a
respondent fails to produce or fails to permit access to relevant evidence
requested by the Commission, the Commission may apply to the chancery court of
Davidson County or circuit court for the county in which such person is found,
resides, or has such person's principal place of business, for an order
requiring the respondent to produce or to permit access to such evidence. The
Commission may also, in such situations and when presented with an unrebutted
prima facie charge of discrimination, issue a finding of reasonable cause to
believe that a discriminatory practice has occurred.
(3) Conference, conciliation, and persuasion:
(a) If the staff determines after
investigation that reasonable cause exists to substantiate the allegations of
the complaint, the investigator or Commission attorney shall report his or her
recommendations to the Executive Director, who shall make a finding and report
to the Commission. Upon a reasonable cause determination, the Commission is
deemed a proper party to the action and the Complainant becomes an aggrieved
party.
(b) After a reasonable cause
determination, the Commission staff shall endeavor to eliminate the unlawful
discriminatory practice by conference, conciliation, and persuasion.
(c) The Commission staff shall notify the
respondent(s) that a particular meeting or conversation is for the purpose of
attempting to conciliate the complaint. These requirements shall not be
construed to limit the power of the Commission to conduct further
investigations in preparation for a hearing or for other purposes in connection
with its statutory duties, nor shall they be construed to prohibit the use of
evidence obtained through such investigations.
(d) If a complaint subsequently proceeds to a
hearing, no testimony shall be given or received concerning any offers or
counteroffers made in an effort to conciliate the case.
(4) If, as a result of conference,
conciliation, or persuasion, the commission staff is able to secure voluntary
compliance that eliminates any unlawful discriminatory practice, a conciliation
agreement shall be prepared. The conciliation agreement shall set forth all
measures to be taken by the parties, including provisions for compliance
reports, and shall be signed by the respondent(s) and the Executive Director of
the Commission. The complainant may sign as an aggrieved party. During
conference, conciliation or persuasion, the Commission is not bound to, but
shall consider, reasonable damages proposed by the Complainant. If a
conciliation agreement is entered into, the commission shall issue and serve on
the complainant an order stating its terms. A copy of the order shall be
delivered to the respondent, and such public officers and persons as the
commission deems proper.
(5)
Administrative Closure. Upon the execution of a conciliation agreement, the
Commission shall administratively close the complaint, and the Executive
Director shall notify the complainant, respondent and the Commissioners of the
terms of such disposition. Disposition of a case by conference, conciliation,
or persuasion shall not preclude the Commission, whenever justice so requires,
from reconsidering the terms of such conciliation at any time and from taking
such further action as it may deem necessary upon notice to the
parties.
(6) In all cases in which
a real estate operator claims as a defense a lack of evidence of financial
ability of the complainant or tester under T.C.A. §
4-21-602(b), the
Commission will investigate to see whether the requirement of financial ability
is applied consistently regardless of the prospective applicant's membership in
a protected class.
(7) No exemption
for familial status shall be allowed under T.C.A. §
4-21-602(d)(1) for
dwellings provided under any state or federal program specifically designed and
operated to assist elderly persons, as defined in the state or federal program,
unless the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has already
determined that the state or federal program is specifically designed and
operated to assist elderly persons.
(8) With regard to housing complaints, the
Commission staff shall complete the investigation and any attempts at
conciliation, and make any determination of reasonable cause to believe that
discrimination took place, within ninety (90) days of the filing of the
complaint, unless such completion is impracticable. If the investigation cannot
be completed within ninety (90) days, the Commission staff shall notify the
complainant(s) and the respondent(s) in writing of the reasons for not doing
so.
Notes
Authority: T.C.A. §§ 4-21-202, 4-21-303, 4-21-601, and 4-21-602.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.