22 Tex. Admin. Code § 5.160 - Effect of Enforcement Proceedings on Application
(a) The application of an Applicant against
whom the Board has initiated an enforcement proceeding may be held at the
Board's discretion, without approval, disapproval, or denial until:
(1) all enforcement proceedings have been
terminated by a final judgment or order and the time for appeal has expired, or
if an appeal is taken, such appeal has been terminated;
(2) the Applicant is in full compliance with
all orders and judgments of the court, all orders and rules of the Board, and
all provisions of the Act; and
(3)
the Applicant has complied with all requests of the Board for information
related to such compliance, upon which the Board shall complete the
consideration of the application in the regular order of business.
(b) An "enforcement proceeding" is
initiated by the commencement of an investigation that is based either on a
formal complaint filed with the Board or on information presented to the Board
that establishes probable cause for a belief in the existence of facts that
would constitute a violation of the Act or the Rules and Regulations of the
Board.
(c) The following sanctions
may be imposed against an Applicant who is found to have falsified information
provided to the Board, violated any of the practice or title restrictions of
the Act, violated any similar practice or title restriction of another
jurisdiction, or otherwise violated any of the statutory provisions or rules
enforced by the Board:
(1)
reprimand;
(2) imposition of an
administrative penalty;
(3)
suspension of the registration certificate upon its effective date;
(4) denial of the application; and
(5) denial of the right to reapply for
registration for a period not to exceed five years.
(d) The Board may take action against an
Applicant for any act or omission if the same conduct would be a ground for
disciplinary action against a Registered Interior Designer.
(e) If an application is denied pursuant to
subsection (c) or subsection (d) of this section, the Applicant may not
subsequently be approved for registration unless the Applicant:
(1) demonstrates that he/she has taken
reasonable steps to correct the misconduct or deficiency that led to the denial
of the previous application;
(2)
demonstrates that approval of the application is not inconsistent with the
Board's duty to protect the public by ensuring that registrants are duly
qualified and fit for registration; and
(3) pays all fees and costs incurred by the
Board as a result of any proceeding that led to the denial of the previous
application.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.