28 Tex. Admin. Code § 19.1731 - Preauthorization Exemption
(a) For the
purposes of this division, a physician or provider should be identified using
the National Provider Identifier (NPI) under which a physician or provider
makes preauthorization requests.
(b) With respect to a particular health care
service for which a physician or provider does not have a preauthorization
exemption, an issuer must conduct an evaluation of all preauthorization
requests submitted by the physician or provider during the most recent
evaluation period that were finalized prior to the evaluation and may not
include a request that is pending appeal at the time the data is analyzed. The
evaluation must be based on no fewer than five eligible preauthorization
requests.
(c) With respect to a
particular health care service for which a physician or provider has a
preauthorization exemption, an issuer may conduct an evaluation, as defined in
§
19.1730(4)(B) of
this title (relating to Definitions), to determine whether to rescind a
preauthorization exemption consistent with Insurance Code §
4201.655, concerning
Denial or Rescission of Preauthorization Exemption. In order to determine
whether to rescind an exemption, the issuer must conduct a retrospective review
of a random sample of at least five and no more than 20 claims submitted during
the most recent evaluation period.
(d) Other than care ordered by a treating
physician or provider that has a preauthorization exemption that is then
rendered by a physician or provider that does not have an exemption, a treating
physician or provider may not rely on another physician's or provider's
preauthorization exemption. If a treating physician or provider does not have a
preauthorization exemption and relies on another physician's or provider's
preauthorization exemption in violation of this subsection, an issuer may
consider the physician or provider who has qualified for the preauthorization
exemption as failing to substantially perform the health care service under
Insurance Code §
4201.659, concerning
Effect of Preauthorization Exemption, and may reduce or deny payment for that
service on that basis. It is not a violation of this subsection for a provider,
such as a nurse or physician's assistant, who practices under the supervision
of a physician, to rely on the supervising physician's exemption, if the
provider appropriately orders care and requests preauthorization under the
supervising physician's NPI.
(e)
For care ordered by a treating physician or provider that has a
preauthorization exemption that is then rendered by a physician or provider
that does not have an exemption, the treating physician or provider must
include the name and NPI of the ordering physician or provider on the claim in
fields 17 and 17B of CMS Form 1500, in fields 76 - 79 or another appropriate
field in Form UB-04, or in the corresponding fields for electronic claims using
the ASC X12N 837 format. The issuer may provide coding guidance to physicians
and providers to ensure that this information is appropriately captured on the
claim. If this information is not included, the issuer may treat the claim as
subject to an otherwise applicable preauthorization requirement.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.