28 Tex. Admin. Code § 4.2807 - Description of Actuarial Memorandum Including an Asset Adequacy Analysis and Regulatory Asset Adequacy Issues Summary
(a)
General. Any actuarial memorandum required by the provisions of this subchapter
must be prepared in accordance with and subject to the provisions and
qualifications of paragraphs (1) - (5) of this subsection.
(1) In accordance with Insurance Code Chapter
425, Subchapter B, concerning Standard Valuation Law, the appointed actuary
must prepare a memorandum to the company describing the analysis done in
support of the appointed actuary's opinion regarding the reserves under the
opinion. The memorandum must be made available for examination by the
commissioner upon the commissioner's request.
(2) In preparing the memorandum, the
appointed actuary may rely on, and include as a part of the appointed actuary's
own memorandum, memoranda prepared and signed by other actuaries who are
qualified within the meaning of §
4.2804 of this title (relating to
Definitions), with respect to the areas covered in such memoranda, and so state
in the other actuaries' memoranda.
(3) If the commissioner requests a memorandum
and no such memorandum exists or if the commissioner finds that the analysis
described in the memorandum fails to meet the standards of the Actuarial
Standards Board as required by §
4.2805 of this title (relating to
General Requirements), or the standards and requirements of this subchapter,
the commissioner may designate a qualified actuary to review the opinion and
prepare such supporting memorandum as is required for review. The reasonable
and necessary expense of the independent review must be paid by the company but
will be directed and controlled by the commissioner.
(4) The reviewing actuary will have the same
status as an examiner for purposes of obtaining data from the company, and the
work papers and documentation of the reviewing actuary will be retained by the
commissioner. The reviewing actuary may not be an employee of a consulting firm
involved with the preparation of any prior memorandum or opinion for the
insurer required by this subchapter for any one of the current year or the
preceding three years.
(5) In
accordance with Insurance Code Chapter 425, Subchapter B, the appointed actuary
must prepare a regulatory asset adequacy issues summary, the contents of which
are specified in subsection (c) of this section. Texas domestic companies must
submit the regulatory asset adequacy issues summary by email to
ActuarialDivision@tdi.texas.gov or by paper copy to the Financial Regulation
Division, MC: FRD, Texas Department of Insurance, P.O. Box 12030, Austin, Texas
78711-2030 no later than March 15 of the year following the year for which a
statement of actuarial opinion based on asset adequacy is required. Nondomestic
companies must submit the regulatory asset adequacy issues summary when
requested by the commissioner.
(b) Details of the memorandum section
documenting asset adequacy analysis. When an actuarial opinion under §
4.2806 of this title (relating to
Statement of Actuarial Opinion Based on an Asset Adequacy Analysis) is
provided, the memorandum must demonstrate that the analysis has been done in
accordance with the standards for asset adequacy referred to in §
4.2805(c) of
this title and any additional standards under this subchapter. The
documentation of the assumptions used in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this
subsection must be such that an actuary reviewing the actuarial memorandum
could form a conclusion as to the reasonableness of the assumptions. The
memorandum must specify:
(1) for reserves:
(A) product descriptions including market
description, underwriting and other aspects of a risk profile and the specific
risks the appointed actuary deems significant;
(B) source of liability in force;
(C) reserve method and basis;
(D) investment reserves;
(E) reinsurance arrangements;
(F) identification of any explicit or implied
guarantees made by the general account in support of benefits provided through
a separate account or under a separate account policy or contract and the
methods used by the appointed actuary to provide for the guarantees in the
asset adequacy analysis;
(G)
documentation of assumptions to test reserves for the following:
(i) lapse rates (both base and
excess);
(ii) interest crediting
rate strategy;
(iii)
mortality;
(iv) policyholder
dividend strategy;
(v) competitor
or market interest rate;
(vi)
annuitization rates;
(vii)
commissions and expenses; and
(viii) morbidity.
(2) For assets:
(A) portfolio descriptions, including a risk
profile disclosing the quality, distribution, and types of assets;
(B) investment and disinvestment
assumptions;
(C) source of asset
data;
(D) asset valuation bases;
and
(E) documentation of
assumptions made for:
(i) default
costs;
(ii) bond call
function;
(iii) mortgage prepayment
function;
(iv) determining market
value for assets sold due to disinvestment strategy; and
(v) determining yield on assets acquired
through the investment strategy.
(3) For the analysis basis:
(A) methodology;
(B) rationale for inclusion or exclusion of
different blocks of business and how pertinent risks were analyzed;
(C) rationale for degree of rigor in
analyzing different blocks of business (including the level of "materiality"
that was used in determining how rigorously to analyze different blocks of
business);
(D) criteria for
determining asset adequacy (including the precise basis for determining if
assets are adequate to cover reserves under "moderately adverse conditions" or
other conditions as specified in relevant actuarial standards of practice);
and
(E) whether the impact of
federal income taxes was considered and the method of treating reinsurance in
the asset adequacy analysis;
(4) summary of material changes in methods,
procedures, or assumptions from prior year's asset adequacy analysis;
(5) summary of results; and
(6) conclusions.
(c) Details of the regulatory asset adequacy
issues summary.
(1) The regulatory asset
adequacy issues summary must include the following.
(A) Descriptions of the scenarios tested
(including whether those scenarios are stochastic or deterministic) and the
sensitivity testing done relative to those scenarios. If negative ending
surplus results under certain tests in the aggregate, the actuary should
describe those tests and the amount of additional reserve as of the valuation
date that, if held, would eliminate the negative aggregate surplus values.
Ending surplus values must be determined by either extending the projection
period until the in force and associated assets and liabilities at the end of
the projection period are immaterial or by adjusting the surplus amount at the
end of the projection period by an amount that appropriately estimates the
value that can reasonably be expected to arise from the assets and liabilities
remaining in force.
(B) The extent
to which the appointed actuary uses assumptions in the asset adequacy analysis
that are materially different than the assumptions used in the previous asset
adequacy analysis.
(C) The amount
of reserves and the identity of the product lines that had been subjected to
asset adequacy analysis in the prior opinion but were not subject to analysis
for the current opinion.
(D)
Comments on any interim results that may be of significant concern to the
appointed actuary. For example, the comments must describe the impact of the
insufficiency of assets to support the payment of benefits and expenses and the
establishment of statutory reserves during one or more interim
periods.
(E) The methods used by
the actuary to recognize the impact of reinsurance on the company's cash flows,
including both assets and liabilities, under each of the scenarios
tested.
(F) Whether the actuary has
been satisfied that all options whether explicit or embedded, in any asset or
liability (including, but not limited to, those affecting cash flows embedded
in fixed income securities) and equity-like features in any investments have
been appropriately considered in the asset adequacy analysis.
(2) The regulatory asset adequacy
issues summary must contain the name of the company for which the regulatory
asset adequacy issues summary is being supplied and be signed and dated by the
appointed actuary rendering the actuarial opinion.
(3) The regulatory asset adequacy issues
summary will be used to examine the company's financial condition and ability
to meet its liabilities. It will be considered information obtained during the
course of an examination under Insurance Code Chapter 401, concerning Audits
and Examinations, and treated as confidential.
(d) Conformity to standards of practice. The
memorandum must include a statement with wording substantially similar to that
of this subsection as follows: "Actuarial methods, considerations, and analyses
used in the preparation of this memorandum conform to the appropriate Standards
of Practice as promulgated by the Actuarial Standards Board, which standards
form the basis for this memorandum."
(e) Use of assets supporting the IMR and the
AVR. An appropriate allocation of assets in the amount of the IMR, whether
positive or negative, must be used in any asset adequacy analysis. Analysis of
risks regarding asset default may include an appropriate allocation of assets
supporting the AVR; these AVR assets may not be applied for any other risks
with respect to reserve adequacy. Analysis of these and other risks may include
assets supporting other mandatory or voluntary reserves available to the extent
not used for risk analysis and reserve support. The amount of the assets used
for the AVR must be disclosed in the table of reserves and liabilities of the
opinion and in the memorandum. The method used for selecting particular assets
or allocated portions of assets must be disclosed in the memorandum.
(f) Documentation retention. The appointed
actuary must retain on file, for at least seven years, sufficient documentation
so that it will be possible to determine the procedures followed, the analyses
performed, the bases for assumptions, and the results obtained.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.