30 Tex. Admin. Code § 70.206 - Factors Considered in the Criminal Enforcement Review Process
(a) The executive director shall consider the
following factors in the process of conducting a criminal enforcement review:
(1) the nature, circumstances, extent,
duration, and gravity of the prohibited act, with special emphasis on the
impairment of existing water rights or the hazard or potential hazard created
to the health or safety of the public;
(2) the result of the violation on:
(A) air quality in the region;
(B) a receiving stream or underground water
reservoir;
(C) instream uses, water
quality, aquatic and wildlife habitat, or beneficial freshwater inflows to bays
and estuaries; or
(D) affected
persons;
(3) with
respect to the alleged violator:
(A) the
history and extent of previous violations;
(B) the degree of culpability, including
whether the violation was attributable to mechanical or electrical failures and
whether the violation could have been reasonably anticipated and
avoided;
(C) the demonstrated good
faith, including actions taken by the alleged violator to rectify the cause of
the violation and to compensate affected persons;
(D) economic benefit gained through the
violation; and
(E) the necessity to
deter future violations; and
(4) any other matters that justice may
require.
(b) The
criminal environmental enforcement review team will be comprised of
representatives with expertise in criminal investigations, civil and
administrative enforcement, and any other relevant specialists.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.