30 Tex. Admin. Code § 80.117 - Order of Presentation
(a) In all
proceedings, the moving party has the right to open and close. Where several
matters have been consolidated, the judge will designate who will open and
close. The judge will determine at what stage other parties will be permitted
to offer evidence and argument. After all parties have completed the
presentation of their evidence, the judge may call upon any party for further
material or relevant evidence upon any issue.
(b) The applicant shall present evidence to
meet its burden of proof on the application, followed by the protesting
parties, the public interest counsel, and the executive director. In all cases,
the applicant shall be allowed a rebuttal. Any party may present a rebuttal
case when another party presents evidence that could not have been reasonably
anticipated. For applications subject to subsection (c) of this section, the
applicant's presentation of evidence to meet its burden of proof may consist
solely of the filing with the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH),
and admittance by the judge, of the administrative record as described in
subsection (c) of this section.
(c)
For contested cases regarding a permit application filed on or after September
1, 2015, and referred to SOAH under Texas Water Code, §
5.556 or §
5.557:
(1) The filing of the administrative record
as described in §
80.118(c) of
this title (relating to Administrative Record) establishes a prima facie
demonstration that:
(A) the draft permit
meets all applicable state and federal legal and technical requirements;
and
(B) a permit, if issued
consistent with the draft permit in the administrative record, would protect
human health and safety, the environment, and physical property.
(2) The applicant, protesting
parties, the public interest counsel, and the executive director may present
evidence after admittance of the administrative record by the judge.
(3) Any party may present evidence to rebut
the prima facie demonstration by demonstrating that one or more provisions in
the draft permit violate a specifically applicable state or federal requirement
that relates to a matter directly referred to SOAH or referred by the
commission. If the prima facie demonstration is rebutted, the applicant or the
executive director may present additional evidence to support the executive
director's draft permit.
(d) In all contested enforcement case
hearings, the executive director has the right to open and close. In all such
cases, the executive director shall be allowed to close with his
rebuttal.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.