30 Tex. Admin. Code § 80.252 - Judge's Proposal for Decision
(a) Any application
that is declared administratively complete on or after September 1, 1999, is
subject to this section.
(b)
Judge's proposal for decision regarding an application filed before September
1, 2015, applications not referred under Texas Water Code (TWC), §5.556 or
§5.557, or applications not subject to TWC, §11.122(b-1). After
closing the hearing record, the judge shall file a written proposal for
decision with the chief clerk no later than the end of the maximum expected
duration set by the commission and shall send a copy by certified mail to the
executive director and to each party.
(c) Judge's proposal for decision regarding
an application filed on or after September 1, 2015, and referred under TWC,
§5.556 or §5.557. After closing the hearing record, the judge shall
file a written proposal for decision with the chief clerk no later than 180
days after the first day of the preliminary hearing, the date specified by the
commission, or the date to which the deadline was extended pursuant to Texas
Government Code, §
2003.047(e-3).
Additionally, the judge shall send a copy by certified mail to the executive
director and to each party.
(d)
Judge's proposal for decision regarding an application filed on or after
September 1, 2017, and subject to TWC, §11.122(b-1). After closing the
hearing record, the judge shall file a written proposal for decision with the
chief clerk no later than 270 days after the first day of the preliminary
hearing, the date specified by the commission, or the date to which the
deadline was extended pursuant to Texas Government Code, §
2003.047(e-3).
Additionally, the judge shall send a copy by certified mail to the executive
director and to each party.
(e)
Proposal for decision: adverse to a party. A proposal for decision shall be
filed by the judge who conducted the hearing or by a substitute judge who has
read the record. If the proposal for decision is adverse to a party to the
proceeding, it shall contain a statement of the reasons for the proposal as
well as findings of fact and conclusions of law which support the proposal on
any issue referred by the commission or added by the judge. If any party has
filed proposed findings of fact upon the judge's request, the judge shall
include with the proposal for decision recommended rulings on all findings of
fact so proposed. Where more than one judge has been assigned to hear a
particular proceeding, the presiding judge will issue the proposal for decision
and the other assigned judge or judges may file comments.
(f) Proposal for decision: not adverse to any
party. If the proposal for decision is not adverse to any party to the
proceeding, the judge may informally dispose of the matter by proposing to the
commission an order which need not contain findings of fact, conclusions of
law, or reasons for the proposal. If the proposal for decision is not adverse
to any party and a permit is to be issued, the judge need not propose an order
to the commission.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.