31 Tex. Admin. Code § 30.30 - Consistency Certifications for Federal License or Permit Activities
(a) Review of a Consistency Certification.
When reviewing a consistency certification submitted by a non-federal applicant
for a federal license or permit activity listed under §
30.12 of this chapter (relating to
Federal Listed Activities Subject to CZMA Review) the GLO shall conform to the
requirements and procedures set out in 15 CFR Part 930, subpart D. The federal
license or permit activity must be consistent with the CMP goals and
enforceable policies.
(b) Required
Information for a Consistency Certification. For review of a federal license or
permit activity application, an applicant must submit to the GLO a complete
consistency certification in conformance with
15 CFR §
930.57 and all necessary data and information
described in 15 CFR §
930.58 and including the following:
(1) all material relevant to the CMP provided
to the federal agency in support of the application;
(2) a detailed description of the proposed
activity, its associated facilities, the coastal effects, and any other
information relied upon by the applicant to make its certification. Maps,
diagrams, and technical data shall be submitted when a written description
alone will not adequately describe the proposal. See
15 CFR §
930.58;
(3) if a mitigation plan is required, an
alternative analysis, habitat characterization, and any required surveys for
the license or permit must be submitted; and
(4) the consistency certification must also
provide: "The proposed activity complies with enforceable policies of Texas'
approved coastal management program and will be conducted in a manner
consistent with such program." See
15 CFR §
930.57(b).
(c) Request for Necessary Data and
Information. If an applicant fails to submit all necessary data and information
required by 15 CFR §
930.58(a), the GLO shall
notify the applicant and the federal agency, within thirty (30) days of receipt
of the incomplete submission, that necessary data and information described in
15 CFR §
930.58(a) was not received
and that the GLO's review period will commence on the date of receipt of the
missing necessary data and information, subject to the requirement in paragraph
(a) of 15 CFR §
930.58 that the applicant has also submitted
a consistency certification. The GLO may waive the requirement that all
necessary data and information described in
15 CFR §
930.58(a) be submitted
before commencement of the six (6) month consistency review period. In the
event of such a waiver, the requirements of §930.58(a) must be satisfied prior
to the end of the six (6) month consistency review period or the GLO may object
to the consistency certification for insufficient information. The type of
information that may be requested is identified in subsection (b) of this
section consistent with the information requirements specified at
15 CFR §
930.58(a).
(d) Review Period. To initiate the GLO's six
(6) month review period, the necessary data and information that is required by
15 CFR §
930.58 and subsection (b) of this section
must be provided to the GLO. The GLO cannot require issued state or local
permits as necessary data or information to initiate the review period. If at
the end of this review period, the applicant has failed to obtain all required
state and local permits this may result in a finding by the GLO that it lacks
the required information to complete the consistency review and may object for
lack of information.
(e) Mutual
Stay Agreement. The GLO and the applicant may enter into a mutual written
agreement to stay the CZMA review period to allow for resolution of the
remaining issues as provided for at
15 CFR §
930.60(b).
(f) Permit Assistance. Upon request of the
applicant, the GLO will provide guidance and assistance to applicants in
conformance with 15 CFR §
930.56.
(g) Consolidation of Federal License or
Permit Activities. The GLO encourages applicants to consolidate related federal
license or permit activities identified in §
30.12 of this chapter (relating to
Federal Listed Activities Subject to CZMA Review) to assist the GLO in
minimizing duplication of effort and unnecessary delays by reviewing all
federal license or permit activities relating to a project at the same
time.
(h) Public Participation. The
GLO shall provide for public participation consistent with the provisions of
15 CFR §
930.61. The GLO may issue joint public
notices with the federal permitting or licensing agency. The GLO may also
extend the public comment period or schedule a public meeting on the
consistency certification. Comments received in response to the public notice
will be considered.
(i)
Demonstration of Consistency. For activities located within the state's
jurisdiction that require state or local permits or authorization, the issued
permit or authorization is considered evidence that demonstrates consistency
with the enforceable policies that the permit or authorization covers. In cases
where an applicant relies on draft NEPA documents to satisfy some of the
necessary data and information requirements for federal consistency review
under subsection C, an applicant should demonstrate how draft NEPA or other
project documentation materials support a finding of consistency with the CMP
goals and enforceable policies in a written document.
(j) Referral to Commissioner. To refer a
matter to the commissioner for an elevated consistency review, at least three
committee members must agree that a significant unresolved issue exists
regarding consistency with the CMP goals and enforceable policies. At least
three committee members must also submit in writing a letter or email addressed
to the CMP coordinator that requests the matter at issue to be referred to the
commissioner for an elevated consistency review. The referral letter or email
should identify any enforceable policies that are unresolved and address any
potential impacts.
(k) Commissioner
Review. Following referral of a federal activity or development project to the
commissioner for an elevated consistency review, the commissioner shall
consider:
(1) oral or written testimony
received during the comment period and the commissioner may reasonably limit
the length and format of the testimony and the time at which it may be
received;
(2) applicable CMP goals
and enforceable policies;
(3)
information submitted by the federal agency or applicant; and
(4) other relevant information to determine
whether the proposed action is consistent with the CMP goals and enforceable
policies.
(l) Presumption
of Concurrence. If the GLO has not issued a decision with respect to a proposed
federal license and permit activity within ninety (90) days from the date when
the GLO receives an administratively complete consistency certification, then
the GLO shall notify the applicant and the federal agency of the status of the
review and the basis for further review. If no action is taken by the GLO or
the commissioner within six (6) months from the date the GLO received the
complete consistency certification, then the action is conclusively presumed to
be consistent with the CMP.
(m)
Commissioner Objection. Once a matter has been elevated to the commissioner for
a consistency review with the CMP goals and enforceable policies, the
commissioner may object to the consistency certification as provided for in
15 CFR §
930.63(h).
(n) Right of Appeal. If the commissioner
finds that the proposed federal license or permit activity is inconsistent with
the CMP enforceable policies and objects to the consistency certification, GLO
shall notify the applicant of its appeal rights to the U.S. Secretary of
Commerce, and the federal agency shall not authorize the federal license or
permit activity, except as provided in the appeals process established in 15
CFR Part 930, subpart H.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.