34 Tex. Admin. Code § 16.208 - Grant Application Review
(a) The grant
application review process shall consist of three steps:
(1) initial screening;
(2) peer review; and
(3) council review and approval.
(b) Initial screening.
(1) Program staff members shall review each
grant application to determine whether the grant application complies with the
requirements contained in this subchapter and the relevant NOFA published by
the council. Grant applications that do not meet these requirements will not be
eligible for review under this section.
(2) A program staff member shall submit each
grant application that meets the requirements described in subsection (b)(1) of
this section to the peer review panel for review.
(c) Peer review.
(1) Peer review panel members shall review
each grant application that is submitted for review by program staff as
described in subsection (b)(2) of this section.
(2) Peer review panel members shall assign a
score for the application based on the application's merit and accounting for
the criteria in the relevant NOFA published by the council, and shall submit
this information to a program staff member.
(3) If a peer review panel member recommends
changes to the grant funds amount requested by the grant applicant or to the
goals and objectives or timeline for the proposed grant project, the
recommended changes and explanation shall be submitted to a program staff
member.
(4) The peer review panel's
scores, rankings and other information submitted for the council's
consideration are recommendations and are advisory only.
(d) Council review and approval.
(1) After receipt of the peer review scores
and recommendations described in subsection (c) of this section, program staff
members shall compile a list of grant applications reviewed by the peer review
panel ranked in order by the final overall evaluation score. The final
evaluation score is determined by averaging together the scores assigned by the
peer review panel members under subsection (c)(2) of this section.
(2) For each application, a program staff
member shall submit to council members:
(A)
the grant application's final overall peer review evaluation score;
(B) the grant application's peer review
ranking;
(C) a summary of the grant
application;
(D) other information
submitted by the peer review panel for the council's consideration;
and
(E) any other information
required for the council's consideration of the grant application.
(3) In making grant award
decisions, the council:
(A) shall ensure that
grant funds are allocated fairly and spent to remediate the opioid crisis in
this state by using efficient and cost-effective methods in accordance with the
opioid strategies approved by the council under Government Code, §
403.509(a)(1)
and §
16.201 of this subchapter, and the
grant issuance plan adopted by the council under §
16.202 of this subchapter;
and
(B) may consider factors
including:
(i) a grant applicant's
experience;
(ii) a grant project's
estimated timeline;
(iii) matching
funds or sustainability plan, if any;
(iv) cost effectiveness, efficacy and overall
impact of the grant project;
(v)
geographic location of the grant project;
(vi) community partnerships; and
(vii) any additional factors listed in the
relevant NOFA published by the council.
(4) The council shall vote on each grant
application in accordance with Government Code, §
403.509(c).
The council may vote on multiple grant applications at one time.
(5) If the council approves a grant award,
the council shall specify the total amount of money approved to fund the grant
project.
(6) All grant funding
decisions are final and are not subject to appeal.
(7) The approval of a grant award shall not
obligate the council to make any additional, supplemental, or other grant
award.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.