34 Tex. Admin. Code § 20.585 - Debarment
(a) Director actions. Under this subchapter,
the director may, in order to protect the interests of the state:
(1) conduct an investigation upon a complaint
regarding a contractor's acts and omissions in procurement or performance of
that contract where the complaint may constitute cause for debarment;
(2) cancel one or more of the
contractor's active or pending contracts upon a complaint regarding the
contractor's acts and omissions in procurement or performance of that contract
where the complaint may constitute cause for debarment;
(3) assess actual damages and costs incurred
due to contractor's failure to perform as specified in the contract;
(4) debar a contractor for a specified period
of time; and
(5) take any other
action authorized by law.
(b) Any action under subsection (a) of this
section shall occur upon notice as required under this subchapter. The director
may, in its sole discretion, find that more than one of the actions in
subsection (a) of this section is appropriate and necessary to protect the
state's interests.
(c) Damages for
failure to perform. The director may assess actual damages and costs incurred
by the state when a contractor fails to perform as specified under a contract.
The damages and costs may be assessed whether or not the contractor received
notice of investigation or debarment under this subchapter. The director shall
consider a failure to pay assessed damages in determining whether to debar a
contractor under this subchapter.
(d) The director may debar a contractor for a
period of no more than five years upon a finding that:
(1) continued acceptance of goods or services
or contractor performance under the contract may constitute a hazard to health,
safety, welfare or property;
(2)
the contractor committed fraud in the procurement or performance of the
contract, including submission of falsified documents by the contractor or any
person under the direction or control of the contractor;
(3) there was financial participation by a
person who received compensation from the governmental entity to participate in
preparing the specifications or request for proposals on which the contract is
based or there was any other violation of state ethics laws;
(4) the contractor has been debarred by
another state or by the federal government;
(5) the contractor has been convicted of a
crime related to fraud in the procurement or performance of any governmental
contract including, but not limited to, a conviction for violation of
antitrust, collusion, conspiracy, larceny, theft of services, bribery, coercion
laws or any other criminal act based on an intent to defraud any governmental
entity in the provision of goods or services; and
(6) the contractor has publicly indicated an
unwillingness to honor a bid award.
(e) The director may debar a vendor for a
period of no more than five years upon a finding that the contractor's
performance was substandard. The comptroller shall consider:
(1) the accumulated scoring measured by the
Vendor Performance Tracking System and:
(A)
the number and severity of the contractor's performance failures in relation to
the volume of goods and services provided;
(B) the effectiveness of remedial measures
taken by the contractor; and
(C)
the age and relevance of past performance information:
(2) the contractor's breach of contract where
the breach results in:
(A) significant
economic loss to the state; significant economic loss includes, but is not
limited to, costs of delay, procurement from a different vendor, costs of
initial procurement, contract administration and any other cost, direct or
indirect, arising from or attributable to the breach;
(B) a hazard to health, safety, welfare or
property; or
(C) damage to the
state's reputation for integrity in procurement or honest, efficient
administration.
(f) The director may debar a vendor for a
period of no more than five years upon a finding that the contractor's
performance has resulted in repeated unfavorable performance reviews under
Government Code, §
2155.089, or repeated
unfavorable classifications received by the vendor under Government Code,
§
2262.055, after
considering the following factors:
(1) the
severity of the substandard performance by the vendor;
(2) the impact to the state of the
substandard performance;
(3) any
recommendations by a contracting state agency that provides an unfavorable
performance review; and
(4)
whether debarment of the vendor is in the best interest of the state.
(g) The director may
bar a vendor from participating in state contracts that are subject to Chapter
2155, including contracts for which purchasing authority is delegated to a
state agency, if more than two contracts between the vendor and the state have
been terminated by the state for unsatisfactory vendor performance during the
preceding three years.
(h) Failure
to meet specifications: general. The director shall remove a vendor's name from
all bidders lists and prohibit the contractor from responding to solicitations
on and receiving any contracts from the state when the contractor's goods or
services fail to meet specifications. The period of removal shall be less than
one year. The period of time for removal shall be determined by evaluating the
factors listed in §
20.583 of this title (relating to
Protecting the State's Interest: Failure to Meet Specifications).
(i) Failure to meet specifications: repeated
complaints. If after the period of removal determined under subsection (h) of
this section, the director determines that the same contractor or a successor
in interest to the contractor has again responded to a contract with goods or
services that do not meet specifications, the director shall remove the
contractor's name and the contractor's goods and services from all bidders
lists for a period of one year.
(j) Failure to meet specifications:
debarment. If after the expiration of the one year removal under subsection (h)
of this section, the director determines that the same contractor or a
successor in interest to the contractor has again responded to a contract with
goods or services that do not meet specifications, the director shall debar the
vendor for a period of no more than five years.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.