34 Tex. Admin. Code § 43.303 - Proposals for Decision and Exceptions regarding Eligibility for Disability Retirement
(a) In a proceeding
relating to a member's eligibility for disability retirement, an administrative
law judge's proposal for decision shall be reviewed by the board of
trustees.
(b) After TRS receives
notice from the administrative law judge under §
43.301(c) of
this chapter (relating to Proposals for Decision and Exceptions), the board of
trustees shall review the proposal for decision of the administrative law judge
and render a decision in the proceeding. The board of trustees may accept or
modify the proposed conclusions of law or proposed findings of fact or may
vacate or modify an order issued by an administrative law judge in the manner
set forth in subsection (d) of this section. If changes are made, the decision
shall state in writing the specific reason and legal basis for each change. A
copy of the decision shall be served on the parties.
(c) The decision of the board of trustees
shall be based upon the existing record in the case, including any exceptions
and replies to exceptions filed with the administrative law judge.
(d) The board of trustees, in the board's
sole discretion may take the following actions:
(1) modify, refuse to accept, or delete any
proposed finding of fact or conclusion of law made by the administrative law
judge;
(2) make alternative
findings of fact and conclusions of law;
(3) vacate or modify an order issued by the
administrative law judge and remand to the administrative law judge, if
necessary; and
(4) make a final
decision on a contested case.
(e) In exercising the board's discretion, the
board of trustees may consider but is not limited to the following grounds for
changing a finding of fact or conclusion of law or for making a final decision
in a contested case that is contrary to the recommendation of the
administrative law judge:
(1) the
administrative law judge did not properly apply or interpret applicable law,
retirement system rules, written policies provided to the administrative law
judge, or prior administrative decisions;
(2) a prior administrative decision on which
the administrative law judge relied is incorrect or should be
changed;
(3) a technical error in a
finding of fact should be changed;
(4) a finding of fact of the administrative
law judge is against the weight of the evidence;
(5) a finding or conclusion or other action
of the administrative law judge would alter the terms of the plan; or
(6) the change is pursuant to a fiduciary
responsibility.
(f) The
board of trustees shall consider a proposal for decision under this section in
open meeting to the extent required by law. The board in its sole discretion
may determine whether to hear oral argument from the parties when considering a
proposal for decision under this section.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.