34 Tex. Admin. Code § 43.304 - Appeals to the Board of Trustees
(a) Any
party adversely affected by a decision of the executive director in a docketed
appeal may appeal the decision to the board of trustees, unless by statute or
other rule the decision of the executive director is the final decision of TRS.
Written notice of appeal and any associated exceptions or briefing under
subsection (d) of this section must be filed with the executive director by the
later of:
(1) 20 days after the decision of
the executive director is mailed; or
(2) the number of days after the date the
decision of the executive director is mailed equal to the number of days it
took the executive director to render the decision in the
proceeding.
(b) The
number of days it took the executive director to render the decision in a
proceeding is calculated from:
(1) if
exceptions to a proposal for decision are not filed, the date of the deadline
to file exceptions to a proposal for decision in the proceeding under §
43.301(b) of
this chapter (relating to Proposals for Decision and Exceptions) to the date
the decision of the executive director is mailed; or,
(2) if exceptions to a proposal for decision
are filed, the date the administrative law judge takes action on the filed
exceptions to the date the decision of the executive director is
mailed.
(c) If notice of
appeal is timely filed, the decision of the executive director shall serve as a
proposal for decision to the board.
(d) If a decision of the executive director
is appealed, the parties may file additional exceptions or briefs and replies.
Additional exceptions or briefs must be filed and served at the same time as
the notice of appeal. Replies shall be filed and served within 15 days of the
filing of the notice of appeal and exceptions or briefs. The executive director
may modify the filing deadlines. Briefs and replies filed under this section
may not include additional evidence not previously admitted into the
administrative record of the proceeding.
(e) A notice of appeal to the Board of
Trustees must also include a statement whether the appealing party is
requesting oral argument before the board of trustees and, if oral argument is
set, whether the party prefers to appear in person or virtually. A notice of
appeal that does not include a statement regarding oral argument shall be
deemed as not requesting oral argument. A notice of appeal that does not
include how the party requests to appear for oral argument shall be deemed as a
request to appear in person.
(f) A
nonappealing party may also request oral argument before the board of trustees
or request that oral argument not be granted in the party's reply to the
appealing party's notice of appeal. The nonappealing party may also state
whether the party requests to appear in person or virtually for oral
argument.
(g) The executive
director, in the executive director's sole discretion, shall determine whether
to grant oral argument in a given appeal and how the parties shall appear for
oral argument, if granted. The executive director shall consult with the
chairman of the board of trustees in making a determination under this
subsection and shall make the determination by order no later than 30 days
prior to the date of the hearing. The order shall be provided to all parties to
the appeal.
(h) The final decision
in an appeal shall be based upon the existing record in the case, including any
exceptions, oral argument, or briefing filed with the board of trustees under
this section. In its sole discretion, the board of trustees may take the
following actions:
(1) modify, refuse to
accept, or delete any proposed finding of fact or conclusion of law made by the
administrative law judge;
(2) make
alternative findings of fact and conclusions of law;
(3) vacate or modify an order issued by the
administrative law judge and remand to the administrative law judge, if
necessary; and
(4) make a final
decision on a contested case.
(i) In exercising its discretion, the board
of trustees may consider but is not limited to the following grounds for
changing a finding of fact or conclusion of law or for making a final decision
in a contested case that is contrary to the recommendation of the
administrative law judge:
(1) the
administrative law judge did not properly apply or interpret applicable law,
retirement system rules, written policies provided to the administrative law
judge, or prior administrative decisions;
(2) a prior administrative decision on which
the administrative law judge relied is incorrect or should be
changed;
(3) a technical error in a
finding of fact should be changed;
(4) a finding of fact of the administrative
law judge is against the weight of the evidence;
(5) a finding or conclusion or other action
of the administrative law judge would alter the terms of the plan; or
(6) the change is pursuant to a fiduciary
responsibility.
(j) An
appeal to the board of trustees shall be considered in open meeting to the
extent required by law.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.