Utah Admin. Code R15-5-6 - Determining the Procedural Validity of a Rule
(1) A person may contest the procedural
validity, or request a determination of whether a rule meets the requirements
of Title 63G, Chapter 3, by filing a written petition with the division.
(a) The rule at issue may be a proposed rule
or an effective rule.
(b) The
petition must be received by the division within the two-year limit set by
Section
63G-3-603.
(c) The petition may emanate from a
rulemaking hearing as in Section
R15-1-8.
(d) The petition shall specify the rule or
rule change at issue and reasons why the petitioner deems it procedurally
flawed or invalid.
(e) The petition
shall be accompanied by any documents the division should consider in reaching
its decision.
(f) The petition
shall be signed and designate a telephone number where the petitioner can be
contacted during regular business hours.
(2) The division shall respond to the
petition in writing within 20 days of its receipt.
(a) The division shall research all records
pertaining to the rule or rule change at issue.
(b) The response of the division shall state
whether the rule is procedurally valid or invalid and how the agency may remedy
any defect.
(c) The division shall
send a copy of the petition and its response to the pertinent agency.
(3) The petitioner may request
reconsideration of the division's findings by filing a written request for
reconsideration with the division director.
(a) The director may respond to the request
in writing.
(b) If the petitioner
receives no response within 20 days, the request is denied.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.