Utah Admin. Code R313-15-403 - Criteria for License Termination Under Restricted Conditions
A site will be considered acceptable for license termination under restricted conditions if:
(1)
The licensee can demonstrate that further reductions in residual radioactivity
necessary to comply with the provisions of Section
R313-15-402
would result in net public or environmental harm or were not being made because
the residual levels associated with restricted conditions are ALARA.
Determination of the levels which are ALARA must take into account
consideration of any detriments, such as traffic accidents, expected to
potentially result from decontamination and waste disposal; and
(2) The licensee has made provisions for
legally enforceable institutional controls that provide reasonable assurance
that the total effective dose equivalent from residual radioactivity
distinguishable from background to the average member of the critical group
will not exceed 0.25 mSv (0.025 rem)per year; and
(3) The licensee has provided sufficient
financial assurance to enable an independent third party, including a
governmental custodian of a site, to assume and carry out responsibilities for
any necessary control and maintenance of the site. Acceptable financial
assurance mechanisms are:
(a) Funds placed
into an account segregated from the licensee's assets outside the licensee's
administrative control, and in which the adequacy of the trust funds is to be
assessed based on an assumed annual one percent real rate of return on
investment;
(b) A statement of
intent in the case of Federal, State, or local Government licensees, as
described in Subsection
R313-22-35(6)(d);
or
(c) When a governmental entity
is assuming custody and ownership of a site, an arrangement that is deemed
acceptable by such governmental entity; and
(4) The licensee has submitted a
decommissioning plan or license termination plan to the Director indicating the
licensee's intent to decommission in accordance with Subsection
R313-22-36(4)
and specifying that the licensee intends to decommission by restricting use of
the site. The licensee shall document in the license termination plan or
decommissioning plan how the advice of individuals and institutions in the
community who may be affected by the decommissioning has been sought and
incorporated, as appropriate, following analysis of that advice;
(a) Licensees proposing to decommission by
restricting use of the site shall seek advice from such affected parties
regarding the following matters concerning the proposed decommissioning:
(i) Whether provisions for institutional
controls proposed by the licensee;
(A) Will
provide reasonable assurance that the total effective dose equivalent from
residual radioactivity distinguishable from background to the average member of
the critical group will not exceed 0.25 mSv (0.025 rem) total effective dose
equivalent per year;
(B) Will be
enforceable; and
(C) Will not
impose undue burdens on the local community or other affected parties; and
(ii) Whether the
licensee has provided sufficient financial assurance to enable an independent
third party, including a governmental custodian of a site, to assume and carry
out responsibilities for any necessary control and maintenance of the site; and
(b) In seeking advice
on the issues identified in Subsection R313-15-403(4)(a), the licensee shall
provide for:
(i) Participation by
representatives of a broad cross section of community interests who may be
affected by the decommissioning;
(ii) An opportunity for a comprehensive,
collective discussion on the issues by the participants represented; and
(iii) A publicly available summary
of the results of all such discussions, including a description of the
individual viewpoints of the participants on the issues and the extent of
agreement and disagreement among the participants on the issues; and
(5) Residual
radioactivity at the site has been reduced so that if the institutional
controls were no longer in effect, there is reasonable assurance that the total
effective dose equivalent from residual radioactivity distinguishable from
background to the average member of the critical group is as low as reasonably
achievable and would not exceed either:
(a)
one mSv (0.1 rem) per year; or
(b)
five mSv (0.5 rem) per year provided the licensee:
(i) Demonstrates that further reductions in
residual radioactivity necessary to comply with the one mSv (0.1 rem) per year
value of Subsection R313-15-403(5)(a) are not technically achievable, would be
prohibitively expensive, or would result in net public or environmental harm;
(ii) Makes provisions for durable
institutional controls; and
(iii)
Provides sufficient financial assurance to enable a responsible government
entity or independent third party, including a governmental custodian of a
site, both to carry out periodic rechecks of the site no less frequently than
every five years to assure that the institutional controls remain in place as
necessary to meet the criteria of Subsection R313-15-403(2) and to assume and
carry out responsibilities for any necessary control and maintenance of those
controls. Acceptable financial assurance mechanisms are those in Subsection
R313-15-403(3).
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.