Utah Admin. Code R33-108-110 - Extension of a Contract Without Engaging in a Standard Procurement Process
(1) One of the
underlying purposes and policies of Title 63G, Chapter 6a, Utah Procurement
Code is to ensure the fair and equitable treatment of any person who deals with
the procurement system and to foster effective broad-based competition within
the free enterprise system. The most effective way to achieve this is by
conducting a standard procurement process when public funds are expended for a
procurement item. A contract extension does not involve a standard procurement
process and should only be used after thorough analysis and proper
justification.
(2) Pursuant to
Section 63G-6a-103, "contract
administration" is a duty of the conducting procurement unit and includes any
functions, duties, and responsibilities associated with closing out a contract.
In fulfillment of these duties, the conducting procurement unit shall maintain
a process or system for tracking contract expiration dates to determine well in
advance of a contract expiration date if there is a continuing need for the
procurement item.
(a) If the conducting
procurement unit determines there is a continuing need for the procurement
item, the conducting procurement unit shall when practicable:
(i) initiate a standard procurement process
no later than 90 days before the contract expiration date of an existing
contract; and
(ii) no later than 45
days before the contract expiration date, publish, if applicable, a
solicitation for the procurement item; or
(b) if the procurement unit determines that a
procurement will be complex or involve a change in industry standards or new
specifications requiring negotiations;
(i)
initiate a standard procurement process no later than 180 days before the
contract expiration date; and
(ii)
no later than 45 days before the contract expiration date, publish, if
applicable, a solicitation for the procurement
item.
(3) The
following do not justify an extension of a contract under Section
63G-6a-802.7:
(a) a conducting procurement unit's
intentional delay in conducting a standard procurement process to award a
contract to replace an expiring contract; and
(b) a conducting procurement unit or vendor's
intentional delay in executing a contract to replace an expiring
contract.
(4) Improperly
avoiding engaging in a standard procurement process to extend the duration of a
vendor's existing contract through means of a contract extension, may be
classified as steering a contract to a favored vendor which is reportable as
unlawful conduct under Section
63G-6a-2407.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.