Utah Admin. Code R33-17-101.13 - Determination Regarding Clearly Erroneous
(1) If, after reviewing the notice of appeal,
the protest appeal record and, if applicable, responses received during an
informal hearing, the protest appeals panel determines that:
(a) There is a reasonable basis for the
decision made by the protest officer and, given the same facts, evidence, and
laws as those reviewed by the protest officer, a reasonable person could have
reached the same decision as the protest officer, then the protest appeals
panel shall conclude that the protest officer's decision was not clearly
erroneous and shall uphold the decision of the protest officer; or
(b) There is no reasonable basis for the
decision made by the protest officer and, given the same facts, evidence, and
laws as those reviewed by the protest officer, a reasonable person could not
have reached the same decision as the protest officer, then the protest appeals
panel shall conclude that the protest officer's decision was clearly erroneous
and shall remand the matter to the protest officer to cure the problem or
render a new decision.
(2) Minor errors and omissions committed by a
protest officer during the protest decision process that are irrelevant,
immaterial, or inconsequential to the overall protest decision may not be
considered sufficient grounds for making a determination that the protest
officer's decision was clearly erroneous.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.