Utah Admin. Code R356-101-10 - Evaluation Criteria
(1) In addition to
criteria established by the Utah Constitution and the Utah Code Annotated,
commission members shall during the nomination process consider the
applicants':
(a) integrity;
(b) legal knowledge and ability;
(c) professional experience;
(d) judicial temperament;
(e) work ethic;
(f) financial responsibility;
(g) public service;
(h) ability to perform the work of a judge;
and
(i) impartiality.
(2) When evaluating applicants for
a juvenile court judge position, commission members shall consider the
applicants' interest in, understanding of, and experience with the issues and
problems facing children and families.
(3) When evaluating applicants for an
appellate court position, commission members shall consider the applicants'
ability to give and receive criticism of opinions and arguments without taking
offense.
(4) When deciding among
applicants for any judicial position whose qualifications, taken as a whole,
appear in all other respects to be comparable, it is relevant to consider the
background and experience of the applicants in relation to the current
composition of the bench for which the appointment is being made.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.