Utah Admin. Code R597-6-9 - Judicial Discipline
(1) For the purposes of judicial performance evaluation and
pursuant to Section 78A-12-205, the commission shall consider any public
sanction of a judge issued by the Supreme Court during the judge's current
term, including any public sanctions:
(a) issued during the judge's midterm and retention
evaluation cycles; and
(b) issued after the end of the judge's retention evaluation
cycle until the commission votes whether to recommend the judge for
retention.
(2) If the Utah Supreme Court issues a public sanction of a
judge after the reconsideration period is no longer available, as set forth in
Subsection 78A-12-203(6), but before Election Day, the commission may elect to
reconsider the commission's recommendation, using the reconsideration process
outlined in Subsection 78A-12-203(6), even if the results of the
reconsideration cannot be printed in the Voter Information Pamphlet, so long as
the reconsideration is communicated through some public means.
(3) If the Utah Supreme Court issues a public sanction of a
judge after the retention election of the judge, but before the end of the
judge's term of office, and if the judge is retained by voters, the commission
shall consider the public sanction as part of the judge's next judicial
performance evaluation.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.