Utah Admin. Code R612-300-11 - Utilization Review Standards
A.
Purpose of Utilization Review and Definitions.
1. "Utilization Review" is used to manage
medical costs, improve patient care and enhance decision-making. Utilization
review includes, but is not limited to, the review of requests for
authorization and the review of medical bills to determine whether the medical
services were or are necessary to treat a workplace injury. Utilization review
does not include:
a. bill review for the
purpose of determining whether the medical services rendered were accurately
billed, or
b. any system, program,
or activity used to determine whether an individual has sustained a workplace
injury.
2. Any
utilization review system shall incorporate a two-level review process that
meets the criteria set forth in subsections B and C of this rule.
3. Definitions. As used in this rule:
a. "Request for Authorization" means any
request by a physician for assurance that appropriate payment will be made for
a course of proposed medical treatment.
b. "Reasonable Attempt" requires at least two
phone calls and a fax, two phone calls and an e-mail, or three phone calls,
within five business days from date of the payor's receipt of the physician's
request for review.
B. Level I - Initial Request and Review.
1. A health care provider may use Form 223 to
request authorization and payment for proposed medical treatment. The provider
shall attach all documentation necessary for the payor to make a decision
regarding the proposed treatment.
a. Requests
for approval of restorative services are governed by the provisions of Section
R612-300.5. C. 7. which requires submission of the appropriate RSA form and
documentation.
2. Upon
receipt of the provider's request for authorization, the payor may use medical
or non-medical personnel to apply medically-based criteria to determine whether
to approve the request. The payor must:
a.
Within 5 business days after receiving the request and documentation, transmit
Form 223 back to the physician, in a verifiable manner, advising of the payor's
approval or denial of the proposed treatment.
i. If approval is denied, the payor must
include with its denial a statement of the criteria it used to make its
determination. A copy of the denial must also be mailed to the injured
worker.
C. Level II - Review.
1. A health care provider who has been denied
authorization or has received no timely response may request a physician's
review by completing and sending the applicable portion of Commission Form 223
to the payor.
a. The provider must include the
times and days that he/she is available to discuss the case with the reviewing
physician, and must be reasonably available during normal business
hours.
b. This request for review
may be used by a health care provider who has been denied authorization for
restorative services pursuant to Subsection
R612-300-5.C.7.
2. The payor's physician
representative must complete the review within five business days of the
treating physician's request for review. Additional time may be requested from
the Commission to accommodate highly unusual circumstances or particularly
difficult cases.
a. The insurer's physician
representative must make a reasonable effort to contact the requesting provider
to discuss the request for treatment. The payor shall notify the Commission if
an additional five days is needed in order to contact the treating physician or
to review the case.
b. If the payor
again denies approval of the recommended treatment, the payor must complete the
appropriate portion of Commission Form 223, and shall include:
i. the criteria used by the payor in making
the decision to deny authorization; and
ii. the name and specialty of the payor's
reviewing physician;
iii. appeals
information.
c. The
denial to authorize payment for treatment must then be sent to the physician,
the injured worker and the Commission.
3. The payor's failure to respond to the
review request within five business days, by a method which provides
certification of transmission, shall constitute authorization for payment of
the treatment.
D.
Mediation and Adjudication. Upon receipt of denial of authorization for payment
for medical treatment at Level II, the Commission will facilitate, upon the
request of the injured worker, the final disposition of the case.
1. If the parties agree, the medical dispute
will be referred to Commission staff for mediation.
2. If the parties do not agree to mediation,
the matter will be referred to the Division of Adjudication for hearing and
decision.
E. Reduction
of Fee for Failure to Follow Utilization Review Standards.
1. In cases in which a health care provider
has received notice of this rule but proceeds with non-emergency medical
treatment without obtaining payor authorization, the following shall apply:
a. If the medical treatment is ultimately
determined to be necessary to treat a workplace injury, the fee otherwise due
the health care provider shall be reduced by 25%.
b. If the medical treatment is ultimately
determined to be unnecessary to treat a workplace injury, the payor is not
liable for payment for such treatment. The injured worker may be liable for the
cost of treatment.
2.
The penalty provision in D.
1. shall not
apply if the medical treatment in question has been preauthorized by some other
non-worker's compensation insurance company or other payor.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.