Utah Admin. Code R650-304-6 - Method and Formula for Determining Grant Amounts
(1) The division shall use a weighted scoring
system that enables the advisory committee to analyze and advise on UCORE grant
awards and award amounts.
(2) The
weighted scoring system shall:
(a) be made
available in the application or grant program guide; and
(b) assess and value general
categories.
(3) The
division shall distribute completed grant applications among advisory committee
members.
(4) Advisory committee
members shall review and score each application using the weighted scoring
system.
(5) The division shall use
the average of the advisory committee members' scores to create a
prioritization matrix that ranks the applications in descending order by grant
amount.
(6) The division shall
provide the advisory committee with:
(a) the
matrix created pursuant to Subsection (5); and
(b) a synopsis of each scored
application.
(7) The
advisory committee shall review the applications in the prioritization matrix,
and the synopsis of each scored application, and shall recommend to the
division UCORE grants for award.
(8) Subject to available funds, the advisory
committee shall prioritize an application that:
(a) is for a program that emphasize outdoor
recreation and education for disadvantaged children;
(b) is for a program from a qualified
applicant within a rural county to ensure geographic parity with urban
counties; or
(c) is for a program
that benefits an underrepresented and underserved community.
(9) In awarding a UCORE grant, the
advisory committee shall consider whether the proposed program furthers the
objectives set out in Subsection
79-8-303(5).
(10) The advisory committee's recommendations
shall be forwarded to the executive director.
(11) The executive director may award a UCORE
grant after consulting with the director and in conjunction with the advisory
committee's recommendations.
(12)
The division shall notify an applicant as to whether the applicant's
application was successful within two weeks of the executive director's final
decision:
(a) a successful applicant shall be
notified of expected contractual requirements; and
(b) a unsuccessful applicant shall be
notified that the applicant's application was unsuccessful.
(13) An advisory committee member
shall recuse themselves from participating in recommendations for any grant in
which the advisory committee member has a substantial interest.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.