Utah Admin. Code R765-134-5 - Procedures for Informal Adjudicative Proceedings
(1) An informal adjudicative proceeding shall
be commenced by either:
(a) a notice of
institutional action, if proceedings are commenced by the institution; or
(b) a request for institutional
action, if proceedings are commenced by persons other than the
institution.
(2) A
notice of institutional action or a request for institutional action shall be
filed and served according to the following requirements:
(a) The notice shall be in writing, signed by
a presiding officer if the proceeding is commenced by the institution, or by
the person invoking the jurisdiction of the institution, or by the person's
representative, and shall include:
(i) the
names and mailing addresses of each respondent and other persons to whom notice
is being given;
(ii) the
institution's file number or other reference number;
(iii) the name of the adjudicative
proceeding;
(iv) the date that the
notice of institutional action or the request for institutional action was
mailed;
(v) if a hearing is to be
held, a statement of the time and place of any scheduled hearing, a statement
of the purpose for which the hearing is to be held, and a statement that a
party who fails to attend or participate in the hearing may be held in
default;
(vi) if a hearing is not
scheduled, a statement that a party may request a hearing within 20 days of the
mailing of the notice or such other time as prescribed by institutional
rule;
(vii) a statement of the
legal authority and jurisdiction under which the adjudicative proceeding is to
be maintained or institutional action is requested;
(viii) a statement of the purpose of the
adjudicative proceeding, the questions to be decided to the extent known or the
facts and reasons forming the basis for relief, and the relief or decision
sought by the commencing party; and
(ix) the name, title, mailing address, and
telephone number of the presiding officer.
(b) The institution shall mail the notice of
institutional action or the request for institutional action to each
party.
(3) No answer or
other pleading responsive to the allegations contained in the notice of
institutional action or the request for institutional action need be
filed.
(4) The institution shall
hold a hearing only if a hearing is required by statute or rule, or if a
hearing is permitted by statute and a hearing is requested by a party within 20
days of the mailing of the notice, or such other time as prescribed by
institutional rule. "Hearing" includes not only a face-to-face proceeding but
also a proceeding conducted by telephone, television or other electronic
means.
(5) In any hearing, the
parties named in the notice of institutional action or in the request for
institutional action shall be permitted to testify, present evidence, and
comment on the issues. Participation may be limited to the named
parties.
(6) Hearings will be held
only after timely notice to each party.
(7) Discovery is prohibited, and the
institution may not issue subpoenas or other discovery orders. The parties may
gather and share information in a non-coercive manner.
(8) Each party shall have access to
information contained in the institution's files and to all materials and
information gathered in any investigation, to the extent permitted by
law.
(9) Intervention is
prohibited, except that the institution may enact rules permitting intervention
where a federal statute or federal rule requires that a state permit
intervention.
(10) Each hearing
shall be open to each party. If the hearing is conducted by telephone,
television or other electronic means this criterion is met if each participant
in the hearing has an opportunity to participate in, to hear, and, if
technically feasible, to see that aspect of the entire proceeding which is
significant to the viewer while the proceeding is taking place.
(11) Within a reasonable time after the close
of the hearing, or after the parties' failure to request a hearing within the
time prescribed by the institution's or this rule, the presiding officer shall
issue a signed order in writing that states the following:
(a) the decision;
(b) the reasons for the decision;
(c) a notice of any right of administrative
or judicial review available to the parties; and
(d) the time limits for filing an appeal or
request for review.
(12)
The presiding officer's order shall be based on the facts appearing in the
institution's files and on the facts presented in evidence at any
hearings.
(13) Each hearing shall
be recorded at the institution's expense. Any party, at his own expense, may
have a reporter approved by the institution prepare a transcript from the
institution's record of the hearing.
(14) Nothing in this rule restricts or
precludes any investigative right or power given to an institution by a statute
other than the Act.
(15) The
presiding officer may enter an order of default against a party if that party
fails to participate in the adjudicative proceeding. The order shall include a
statement of the grounds for default and be mailed to each party. A defaulted
party may seek to have the institution set aside the default order according to
procedures outlined in the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 60. After
issuing the order of default, the presiding officer shall conduct any further
proceedings necessary to complete the adjudicative proceeding without the
participation of the party in default and determine each issue in the
adjudicative proceeding, including those affecting the defaulting
party.
(16) If a statute or the
institution's rules permit parties to any adjudicative proceeding to seek
review of an order, the aggrieved party may file a written request for review
within ten days after the issuance of the order with the person or entity
designated for that purpose by statute or rule. The form and procedures for
such a request are set forth in Section
63G-4-301.
(17) Within ten days after the date that an
order on review is issued, or within ten days after the date that a final order
is issued for which institutional review is unavailable, any party may file a
written request for reconsideration, stating the specific grounds upon which
relief is requested. Unless otherwise provided by statute, the filing of the
request is not a prerequisite for seeking judicial review of the order or the
order on review. The request for reconsideration shall be filed with the
institution and one copy shall be sent by mail to each party by the person
making the request. The institution president, or a person designated for that
purpose, shall issue a written order granting the request or denying the
request. If the president or his designee does not issue an order within 20
days after the filing of the request, the request for rehearing shall be
considered to be denied.
(18) A
party aggrieved may obtain judicial review of final institutional action except
in actions where judicial review is expressly prohibited by statute, only after
exhausting all administrative remedies available, except that:
(a) a party seeking judicial review need not
exhaust administrative remedies if a statute states that exhaustion is not
required; and
(b) the court may
relieve a party seeking judicial review of the requirement to exhaust any or
all administrative remedies if the administrative remedies are inadequate, or
exhaustion of remedies would result in irreparable harm disproportionate to the
public benefit derived from requiring exhaustion.
(19) A party shall file a petition for
judicial review of final institutional action within 30 days after the date
that the order constituting the final institutional action is issued. The
petition shall name the institution and all other appropriate parties as
respondents and shall meet the form requirements specified in the
Act.
(20) The district courts shall
have jurisdiction to review by trial de novo all final institutional action
resulting from an adjudicative proceeding hereunder, except that final
institutional action from proceedings based on a record shall be reviewed by
the district courts on the record according to the standards of Subsection
63G-4-403(4).
The form of the petition and procedures for this process are set forth in
Section 63G-4-402.
(21) Unless precluded by statute, the
institution may grant a stay of its order, or other temporary remedy during the
pendency of judicial review, according to the institution's rules. If the
institution denies a stay or denies other temporary remedies requested by a
party, the institution's order of denial shall be mailed to all parties and
shall specify the reasons why the stay or other temporary remedy was not
granted.
(22) An institution may
issue an order on an emergency basis without complying with the requirements of
the Act if the facts known by the institution or presented to the institution
show that an immediate and significant danger to the public health, safety, or
welfare exists, and the threat requires immediate action by the institution. In
issuing its emergency order, the institution shall comply with Section
63G-4-502.
(23)
(a)
Any person may file a request for institutional action, requesting that the
institution issue a declaratory order determining the applicability of a
statute, rule, or order within the primary jurisdiction of the institution to
specified circumstances. An institution may issue a declaratory order that
would substantially prejudice the rights of a person who would be a necessary
party, only if that person consents in writing to the determination of the
matter by a declaratory proceeding. After receipt of a petition for a
declaratory order, the institution may issue a written order:
(i) declaring the applicability of the
statute rule, or order in question to the specified circumstances;
(ii) setting the matter for adjudicative
proceedings;
(iii) agreeing to
issue a declaratory order within a specified time; or
(iv) declining to issue a declaratory order
and stating the reasons for its action.
(b) The declaratory order shall contain:
(i) the names of all parties to the
proceeding on which it is based;
(ii) the particular facts on which it is
based; and
(iii) the reasons for
its conclusions.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.