Utah Admin. Code R861-1A-35 - Manner of Retaining Records Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Sections 59-1-210, 59-5-104, 59-5-204, 59-6-104, 59-7-506, 59-8-105, 59-8a-105, 59-10-501, 59-12-111, 59-13-211, 59-13-312, 59-13-403, 59-14-303, and 59-15-105
A. Definitions.
1. "Database Management System" means a
software system that controls, relates, retrieves, and provides accessibility
to data stored in a database.
2.
"Electronic data interchange" or "EDI technology" means the
computer-to-computer exchange of business transactions in a standardized,
structured electronic format.
3.
"Hard copy" means any documents, records, reports, or other data printed on
paper.
4. "Machine-sensible record"
means a collection of related information in an electronic format.
Machine-sensible records do not include hard-copy records that are created or
recorded on paper or stored in or by an imaging system such as microfilm,
microfiche, or storage-only imaging systems.
5. "Storage-only imaging system" means a
system of computer hardware and software that provides for the storage,
retention, and retrieval of documents originally created on paper. It does not
include any system, or part of a system, that manipulates or processes any
information or data contained on the document in any manner other than to
reproduce the document in hard copy or as an optical image.
6. "Taxpayer" means the person required,
under Title 59 or other statutes administered by the Tax Commission, to
collect, remit, or pay the tax or fee to the Tax Commission.
B. If a taxpayer retains records
in both machine-sensible and hard-copy formats, the taxpayer shall make the
records available to the commission in machine-sensible format upon request by
the commission.
C. Nothing in this
rule shall be construed to prohibit a taxpayer from demonstrating tax
compliance with traditional hard-copy documents or reproductions thereof, in
whole or in part, whether or not the taxpayer also has retained or has the
capability to retain records on electronic or other storage media in accordance
with this rule. However, this does not relieve the taxpayer of the obligation
to comply with B.
D. Recordkeeping
requirements for machine-sensible records.
1.
Machine-sensible records used to establish tax compliance shall contain
sufficient transaction- level detail information so that the details underlying
the machine-sensible records can be identified and made available to the
commission upon request. A taxpayer has discretion to discard duplicated
records and redundant information provided its responsibilities under this rule
are met.
2. At the time of an
examination, the retained records must be capable of being retrieved and
converted to a standard record format.
3. Taxpayers are not required to construct
machine-sensible records other than those created in the ordinary course of
business. A taxpayer who does not create the electronic equivalent of a
traditional paper document in the ordinary course of business is not required
to construct such a record for tax purposes.
4. Electronic Data Interchange Requirements.
a) Where a taxpayer uses electronic data
interchange processes and technology, the level of record detail, in
combination with other records related to the transactions, must be equivalent
to that contained in an acceptable paper record.
b) For example, the retained records should
contain such information as vendor name, invoice date, product description,
quantity purchased, price, amount of tax, indication of tax status, and
shipping detail. Codes may be used to identify some or all of the data
elements, provided that the taxpayer provides a method that allows the
commission to interpret the coded information.
c) The taxpayer may capture the information
necessary to satisfy D.4.b) at any level within the accounting system and need
not retain the original EDI transaction records provided the audit trail,
authenticity, and integrity of the retained records can be established. For
example, a taxpayer using electronic data interchange technology receives
electronic invoices from its suppliers. The taxpayer decides to retain the
invoice data from completed and verified EDI transactions in its accounts
payable system rather than to retain the EDI transactions themselves. Since
neither the EDI transaction nor the accounts payable system captures
information from the invoice pertaining to product description and vendor name,
i.e., they contain only codes for that information, the taxpayer also retains
other records, such as its vendor master file and product code description
lists and makes them available to the commission. In this example, the taxpayer
need not retain its EDI transaction for tax purposes.
5. Electronic data processing systems
requirements.
a) The requirements for an
electronic data processing accounting system should be similar to that of a
manual accounting system, in that an adequately designed accounting system
should incorporate methods and records that will satisfy the requirements of
this rule.
6. Business
process information.
a) Upon the request of
the commission, the taxpayer shall provide a description of the business
process that created the retained records. The description shall include the
relationship between the records and the tax documents prepared by the
taxpayer, and the measures employed to ensure the integrity of the
records.
b) The taxpayer shall be
capable of demonstrating:
(1) the functions
being performed as they relate to the flow of data through the
system;
(2) the internal controls
used to ensure accurate and reliable processing; and
(3) the internal controls used to prevent
unauthorized addition, alteration, or deletion of retained records.
c) The following specific
documentation is required for machine-sensible records retained pursuant to
this rule:
(1) record formats or
layouts;
(2) field definitions,
including the meaning of all codes used to represent information;
(3) file descriptions, e.g., data set name;
and
(4) detailed charts of accounts
and account descriptions.
E. Records maintenance requirements.
1. The commission recommends but does not
require that taxpayers refer to the National Archives and Record
Administration's (NARA) standards for guidance on the maintenance and storage
of electronic records, such as labeling of records, the location and security
of the storage environment, the creation of back-up copies, and the use of
periodic testing to confirm the continued integrity of the records. The NARA
standards may be found at 36 C.F.R., Section 1234 ,(1995).
2. The taxpayer's computer hardware or
software shall accommodate the extraction and conversion of retained
machine-sensible records.
F. Access to machine-sensible records.
1. The manner in which the commission is
provided access to machine-sensible records as required in B. may be satisfied
through a variety of means that shall take into account a taxpayer's facts and
circumstances through consultation with the taxpayer.
2. Access will be provided in one or more of
the following manners:
a) The taxpayer may
arrange to provide the commission with the hardware, software, and personnel
resources necessary to access the machine-sensible records.
b) The taxpayer may arrange for a third party
to provide the hardware, software, and personnel resources necessary to access
the machine-sensible records.
c)
The taxpayer may convert the machine-sensible records to a standard record
format specified by the commission, including copies of files, on a magnetic
medium that is agreed to by the commission.
d) The taxpayer and the commission may agree
on other means of providing access to the machine- sensible records.
G. Taxpayer
responsibility and discretionary authority.
1.
In conjunction with meeting the requirements of D., a taxpayer may create files
solely for the use of the commission. For example, if a data base management
system is used, it is consistent with this rule for the taxpayer to create and
retain a file that contains the transaction-level detail from the data base
management system and meets the requirements of D. The taxpayer should document
the process that created the separate file to show the relationship between
that file and the original records.
2. A taxpayer may contract with a third party
to provide custodial or management services of the records. The contract shall
not relieve the taxpayer of its responsibilities under this rule.
H. Alternative storage media.
1. For purposes of storage and retention,
taxpayers may convert hard-copy documents received or produced in the normal
course of business and required to be retained under this rule to microfilm,
microfiche or other storage-only imaging systems and may discard the original
hard-copy documents, provided the conditions of this section are met. Documents
that may be stored on these media include general books of account, journals,
voucher registers, general and subsidiary ledgers, and supporting records of
details, such as sales invoices, purchase invoices, exemption certificates, and
credit memoranda.
2. Microfilm,
microfiche and other storage-only imaging systems shall meet the following
requirements:
a) Documentation establishing
the procedures for converting the hard-copy documents to microfilm, microfiche,
or other storage-only imaging system must be maintained and made available on
request. This documentation shall, at a minimum, contain a sufficient
description to allow an original document to be followed through the conversion
system as well as internal procedures established for inspection and quality
assurance.
b) Procedures must be
established for the effective identification, processing, storage, and
preservation of the stored documents and for making them available for the
period they are required to be retained.
c) Upon request by the commission, a taxpayer
must provide facilities and equipment for reading, locating, and reproducing
any documents maintained on microfilm, microfiche, or other storage-only
imaging system.
d) When displayed
on equipment or reproduced on paper, the documents must exhibit a high degree
of legibility and readability. For this purpose, legibility is defined as the
quality of a letter or numeral that enables the observer to identify it
positively and quickly to the exclusion of all other letters or numerals.
Readability is defined as the quality of a group of letters or numerals being
recognizable as words or complete numbers.
e) All data stored on microfilm, microfiche,
or other storage-only imaging systems must be maintained and arranged in a
manner that permits the location of any particular record.
f) There is no substantial evidence that the
microfilm, microfiche or other storage-only imaging system lacks authenticity
or integrity.
I. Effect on hard-copy recordkeeping
requirements.
1. Except as otherwise provided
in this section, the provisions of this rule do not relieve taxpayers of the
responsibility to retain hard-copy records that are created or received in the
ordinary course of business as required by existing law and regulations.
Hard-copy records may be retained on a recordkeeping medium as provided in
H.
2. Hard-copy records not
produced or received in the ordinary course of transacting business, e.g., when
the taxpayer uses electronic data interchange technology, need not be
created.
3. Hard-copy records
generated at the time of a transaction using a credit or debit card must be
retained unless all the details necessary to determine correct tax liability
relating to the transaction are subsequently received and retained by the
taxpayer in accordance with this rule. These details include those listed in
D.4.a) and D.4.b).
4. Computer
printouts that are created for validation, control, or other temporary purposes
need not be retained.
5. Nothing in
this section shall prevent the commission from requesting hard-copy printouts
in lieu of retained machine-sensible records at the time of
examination.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.