Utah Admin. Code R986-700-743 - CCQS Rating Administrative Review
(1) A program may request a review of a
certified quality rating following the process established by OCC
policy.
(2) A review request shall
be submitted within 30 calendar days of the date of the certified rating award
notice except where there is good cause for failing to request a review within
this timeframe.
(a) Good cause for failing to
timely request review is limited to circumstances that are:
(i) beyond the party's control, or;
(ii) compelling and
reasonable.
(b) Good
cause excludes ordinary illness, lack of transportation and temporary
absences.
(3) Quality
Rating Pending Review. The certified quality rating issued in the quality
rating award notice shall be published by OCC and remain published until the
review is complete. Issuance of an ESG shall be temporarily suspended until the
review is complete.
(4) OCC Review.
Each request for review submitted to OCC shall be subject to an OCC review.
Upon final determination of the OCC review, a notice of determination shall be
sent to the program.
(5) If a
program does not agree with the OCC review determination, the program may
request a review by the Certified Quality Rating Review Committee.
(a) A review request shall be submitted
within 30 calendar days of the date of the OCC review determination, except
where there is good cause for failing to request a review within this timeframe
pursuant to Subsection
R986-700-742(2).
(b) A review by the Review Committee is an
informal adjudicative proceeding under the Utah Administrative Procedures
Act.
(c) A review may:
(i) include an OCC staff member to present
the conclusions of the OCC review;
(ii) provide an opportunity for the program
to present their reasons and evidence for the review request; and
(iii) include witnesses or legal
representatives, as applicable; and
(iv) a request for any additional
documentation relevant to the review, from either OCC or the program.
(d) Failure by the program to
respond to any request by the Review Committee shall result in a dismissal of
the review request.
(e) The Review
Committee will issue a recommendation to the Department of Workforce Services
Director of Adjudication once the review process is complete.
(6) The Director of Adjudication
will make a final certified quality rating decision based upon the
recommendation of the Review Committee. The Director of Adjudication decision
is the final agency action pursuant to the Utah Administrative Procedures
Act.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.