W. Va. Code R. § 135-2-4 - Formula Development, Implementation, and Administration
4.1. The Chancellor
shall develop, in consultation with the Funding Formula Advisory Committee, as
defined in section 4.3 of this Rule, a funding formula for the community and
technical colleges that will serve as a broad framework for efforts to improve
student outcomes and institutional efficiency. The Council shall use the
funding formula to determine the annual base budget request for each community
and technical college, beginning with the fiscal year 2024 budgeting cycle. The
formula shall, at a minimum:
4.1.1. Apply to
thirty percent (30%) of each institution's base appropriation, referred to
herein as the Outcomes-Based Funding Pool;
4.1.2. Set aside seventy percent (70%) of
each institution's base appropriation, referred to herein as the Base Operating
Budget, which shall be exempt from outcomes-based funding
calculations;
4.1.3. Hold
institutions accountable for increasing the educational attainment levels of
West Virginia citizens by addressing the State's economic development and
workforce needs and promoting increased degree production, with a particular
emphasis on degrees awarded in academic programs aligned with State Priority
Fields;
4.1.4. Acknowledge the
unique mission of each community and technical college;
4.1.5. Be based on a set of objective
performance metrics that reflect and support the State's higher education goals
and priorities;
4.1.6. Incorporate
safeguards to ensure stability of the funding formula, including, but not
limited to:
4.1.6.a. A Hold Harmless
Provision; and
4.1.6.b. To the
extent possible, employment of a three-year rolling average for all data
metrics; and
4.1.7.
Apply an annual inflation adjustment, calculated utilizing the Higher Education
Price Index, to each institution's Base Operating Budget, Outcomes-Based
Funding Pool, and the system-wide rate per weighted outcome.
4.2. Nothing in this rule shall be
interpreted as prohibiting an institution from submitting requests for special
appropriations to support capital projects or other projects or
initiatives.
4.3. Funding Formula
Advisory Committee
4.3.1.a. The Chancellor
shall appoint a Funding Formula Advisory Committee (Advisory Committee) whose
membership shall be comprised of the president of each community and technical
college or a president's designee and additional members with relevant
expertise as deemed appropriate and necessary by the Chancellor.
4.3.1.b. The Chancellor or his or her
designee shall serve as the chair of the Advisory Committee.
4.3.1.c. The Advisory Committee shall meet at
least annually at a time and place determined by the Chancellor.
4.3.1.d. The Advisory Committee shall review
the funding formula components and identify needed revisions, additions, or
deletions to the formula.
4.3.1.e.
The Chancellor shall not be bound by the advice of the Advisory
Committee.
4.4.
Amendments or Revisions to the Funding Formula. - The Chancellor, in
consultation with the Advisory Committee and upon approval by the Council, may
revise the metrics comprising the funding formula outlined in Subsection 4.5
below as necessary based on changes in State priorities.
4.5. Funding Formula Elements.
4.5.1. Funding Formula calculations shall, at
a minimum, be based on the following data metrics:
4.5.1.a. Progression outcomes.
4.5.1.b. Completion Outcomes.
4.5.1.b.1. One-year certificate
completers;
4.5.1.b.2. Associate
and bachelor's degree completers;
4.5.1.b.3. Students transferring to a
four-year institution;
4.5.1.b.4.
Workforce training contact hours completed; and
4.5.1.b.5. Students completing short-term
workforce training programs.
4.5.1.c. Workforce Outcomes
4.5.1.c.1. Graduates earning wages in West
Virginia; and
4.5.1.c.2. Graduates
enrolled in continued postsecondary education.
4.5.1.d. Efficiency Outcomes, based on the
number of students earning certificates and degrees per 100 full-time
equivalent (FTE) students.
4.5.1.e.
Other metrics as defined by the Chancellor, in consultation with the Council
and the Advisory Committee.
4.5.2. Mission Weighting
4.5.2.a. The Funding Formula shall
incorporate mathematical factors to provide for differential weighting of data
metrics based on institutional mission.
4.5.2.b. Mission weights shall be established
in consultation with institutional leadership, within parameters established by
the Chancellor, and must be approved by each institution's board of governors.
The boards of governors shall notify the Chancellor of such institutional
mission weights by letter from the board's chair or the chair's
designee.
4.5.2.c. Should a board
of governors fail to adopt institutional mission weights and submit
notification of the same to the Chancellor prior to the established deadline,
the Chancellor shall determine that institution's mission weights on the
board's behalf.
4.5.2.d. Mission
weights shall be finalized at the beginning of each five-year funding cycle and
may not be amended or adjusted prior to the end of the cycle;
Provided, that the Chancellor may grant exceptions for good
cause shown.
4.6. Data Collection Requirements
4.6.1. Each institution is responsible for
the timely submission to the Council of all data necessary for the
administration of the funding formula.
4.6.2. On or before July 1 of each year, the
Council shall publish and distribute a calendar specifying due dates for the
submission of data elements required for the administration of the funding
formula.
4.6.3. Should an
institution fail to submit all necessary data prior to the deadline prescribed
by the Council, the institution's budget request shall be based on the
recommended funding level from the most recent fiscal year in which all data
were provided, with the Outcomes Based Funding Pool amount reduced by five
percent (5%) and no adjustment for inflation applied.
4.6.4. Each institutional board of governors
shall adopt a policy pursuant to W. Va. Code §
18B-1-6 establishing procedures
and internal controls that ensure the integrity and validity of data submitted
in support of the funding formula. The boards shall submit their initial
policies to the Council no later than June 30, 2023 and any subsequent
amendments thereto in accordance with statutory rulemaking
procedures.
4.6.5. The Council may
conduct periodic audits of institutional data submissions, institutional
processes and procedures governing the collection and submission of data, any
source data upon which submitted data files are based, and any other funding
formula related data determined necessary by the Chancellor. The cost of such
audits shall be borne by the Council.
4.7. State Priority Degree Fields
4.7.1. The funding formula shall incentivize
undergraduate certificate, associate degree, and bachelor's degree production
in certain fields identified by the West Virginia Department of Commerce as
State Priority Programs.
4.7.2. As
the State's workforce needs are everchanging, the Department of Commerce may
recommend designating a new State Priority Program at any point in the funding
cycle.
4.7.3. Once identified as a
State Priority Program, a program shall maintain the Priority designation for a
period of at least five full academic years.
4.7.4. State Priority Programs shall be
identified by the Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) Code
associated with the program of study in the Council's official inventory of
degree programs.
4.7.5. An
institution may request to change the CIP Code of an existing program to a code
on the State Priority Programs list but must provide sufficient documentation
demonstrating that the coursework and content delivered through an approved
program of study align with the proposed new CIP discipline.
4.7.6. For any new academic program assigned
a CIP Code on the State Priority Programs list, the Chancellor may require an
institution to submit documentation demonstrating that the coursework and
content delivered through an approved program of study align with the proposed
new CIP discipline.
4.7.7. The
Chancellor may disqualify any new or existing academic program from being
identified as a State Priority Program if it is determined that the coursework
and content delivered through an approved program of study do not align
sufficiently with the proposed new CIP discipline.
4.7.8. An institution may appeal any decision
by the Chancellor to disqualify a State Priority Program. Such appeal shall be
made in writing to the Council for consideration at the Council's next regular
meeting. Changes to the State Priority Program inventory resulting from an
appeal shall have no retroactive effect on model calculations.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.