120 U.S. 782 (7 S.Ct. 780, 30 L.Ed. 824)
Ex parte HARDING.
Decided: March 21, 1887
Joseph K. Toole, A. B. Browne, and A. T. Britton, for petitioner.
WAITE, C. J.
This motion is denied. This court has no jurisdiction for the discharge on habeas corpus of a person imprisoned under the sentence of a territorial court in a criminal case, unless the sentence exceeds the jurisdiction of that court, or there is no authority to hold him under the sentence. Ex parte Wilson, 114 U. S. 420, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 935, and the cases there cited. The fact that a law of the United States to sit on a grand jury, and tention to become a citizen of the United States to sit on a grant jury, and that an alien did in fact sit on the jury that found the indictment against this petitioner, did not deprive the court of its jurisdiction for his trial under the indictment. The objection, if it be one, goes only to the regularity of the proceedings, not to the jurisdiction of the court. The same is true of the allegation in the petition that the petitioner was denied his right to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor. For such errors or irregularities, if they exist, a judgment is not void, and a writ of habeas corpus gives this court no authority for their correction.
CC∅ | Transformed by Public.Resource.Org
- PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner v. George F. RITCHIE.
- HORNER v. UNITED STATES
- BROWN v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.
- JOSE MCMICKING, Appt., v. ROBERT G. SCHIELDS.
- NotFound v. NotFound
- SUNAL v. LARGE. ALEXANDER v. UNITED STATES ex rel. KULICK.
- MORITA KEIZO, Plff. in Err., v. WILLIAM HENRY, High Sheriff of the Territory of Hawaii.
- ROOKER et al. v. FIDELITY TRUST CO. et al.
- COLLINS v. MILLER, U. S. Marshal. CARLISLE, British Consul General, v. COLLINS.