10 U.S. Code § 2495 - Nonappropriated fund instrumentalities: purchase of alcoholic beverages
2000—Subsec. (c)(2), (3). Pub. L. 106–398 redesignated par. (3) as (2) and struck out former par. (2) which read as follows: “If the use of a private distributor would subject covered alcoholic beverage purchases of distilled spirits to direct or indirect State taxation, a nonappropriated fund instrumentality shall be considered to be the most economical method of distribution regardless of the results of the determination under paragraph (1).”
1996—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 104–106, § 333(a), inserted “and distributed in the most economical manner” after “most competitive source”.
Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 104–106, § 333(b), added subsec. (c) and redesignated former subsec. (c) as (d).
1987—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 100–180 struck out “purchased for resale on a military installation located in the contiguous States” after “malt beverages and wines”.
Pub. L. 109–148, div. A, title VIII, § 8080, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2717, which provided that none of the funds appropriated by div. A of Pub. L. 109–148 were to be used for the support of any nonappropriated funds activity of the Department of Defense that procured malt beverages and wine with nonappropriated funds for resale (including such alcoholic beverages sold by the drink) on a military installation located in the United States unless such malt beverages and wine were procured within that State, or in the case of the District of Columbia, within the District of Columbia, in which the military installation was located, was from the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2006, and was repeated in provisions of subsequent appropriations acts which are not set out in the Code. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriations acts:
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.