accord and satisfaction
Accord and satisfaction occurs when there is an agreement ( accord ) between two parties (an obligor and an obligee ) for alternative performance to discharge a pre-existing duty , and the obligor subsequently completes such performance ( satisfaction ). Accord and satisfaction is an affirmative defense . See, e.g., Rose Inn of Ithaca, Inc. v. Great American Ins. Co. , 75 A.D.3d 737 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010) .
An accord and satisfaction is one way around the common law pre-existing duty rule , under which performance of an obligation already owed cannot be adequate consideration for a change to an existing contract (or the creation of a new one), making the agreement voidable . To be effective, the alternative performance must be different in some way, and mere partial completion of the existing obligation does not suffice.
- For example, if Party A owes Party B $100 cash, a later agreement to accept $75 cash is voidable by Party B because it is merely a partial performance of the existing duty. If, on the other hand, the parties make a later agreement for payment in the form of concert tickets, there is a valid accord and satisfaction when the tickets change hands, even if the tickets are worth less than $100, because the tickets are new consideration to support the second agreement.
Accord and satisfaction is distinct from contract modification , which immediately discharges a pre-existing duty under an existing contract between the parties. Accord and satisfaction does not discharge the pre-existing duty until the alternative performance occurs, and there may not always be existing privity of contract between the parties (e.g., when the obligee is a third-party beneficiary ).
As it concerns the law of negotiable instruments in the United States, accord and satisfaction by instrument is governed by Section 3-311 of the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.).
[Last reviewed in October of 2024 by the Wex Definitions Team ]
Wex