frustration of purpose
Frustration of purpose, also called commercial frustration, is an excuse for nonperformance of a contract when an unforeseeable event destroys the agreement’s principal purpose. It is distinct from impossibility, which applies (as the name indicates) when performance itself becomes literally impossible. For example, if parties enter into a futures contract for grain, but a fire causes the seller to have no crop that year and is unable to perform the contract, the buyer can use the frustration of purpose to excuse performance.
Courts interpret frustration of purpose narrowly. The Uniform Commercial Code § 2-615 provides a related doctrine of impracticability for contracts involving the sale of goods. Unlike frustration, which applies when the contract’s value is effectively eliminated, impracticability excuses performance where an unforeseen contingency makes performance possible in theory but so difficult, costly, or risky in practice that the law relieves the party of the duty.
Frustration of purpose does not apply where the event was foreseeable. In Lloyd v. Murphy, 25 Cal. 2d 48 (1944), the California Supreme Court held that wartime restrictions on automobile sales did not excuse a dealer’s lease obligations, reasoning that contracts formed during wartime are presumed to account for wartime risks.
[Last reviewed in September of 2025 by the Wex Definitions Team]
Wex