Long Island Care at Home v. Coke
Issues
Must a federal court defer to a Department of Labor regulation that interprets the Fair Labor Standards Act as exempting home care workers employed by agencies or other third parties if the regulation was published under the heading “Interpretations?”
The Fair Labor Standards Act sets the minimum wage and other mandatory benefits for workers. Homecare workers such as babysitters and companions to the elderly are exempt from its provisions when employed directly for the family they work for, but what about when they are employed by a third party provider of such services? After following a notice-and-comment rulemaking procedure the Department of Labor said, in 29 C.F.R. § 552.109(a) under the heading “interpretations,” that such third-party employed workers are exempt from the minimum wage requirement. Coke, a homecare worker employed by third-party provider Long Island Care at Home, brought suit questioning the validity of § 109(a). The Second Circuit Court of Appeals held the regulation was unenforceable. The United States Supreme Court now takes up the question of whether the Second Circuit gave the proper amount of deference to the Department of Labor’s stance on the regulation in question.
Questions as Framed for the Court by the Parties
Originally, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) mandated a minimum wage and overtime benefits to those workers whose employer was engaged in commerce or produced goods for commerce and whose gross sales met or exceeded $250,000. 29 U.S.C. § 213.
Additional Resources
- LII Law About . . . Employment
- On the Docket, “Long Island Care at Home v. Coke”
- Wikipedia, Fair Labor Standards Act
- Wikipedia, Home Care
- Service Employees International Union, “Court Reviews Home Care Case”
- New York City Law Department, “U.S. Supreme Court Takes Case Impacting City Programs Providing Long-Term Home Health Care” (PDF)
- National Private Duty Association, Can Agencies Continue to Use the Companionship Service Exemption?
- Prawfsblog, “Coke is it: Coke v. Long Island Care”
- New York Times, Justices to Hear Case on Wages of Home Aides