Tory v. Cochran
In 1983, Ulysses Tory retained Johnnie L. Cochran, Jr. as his attorney in a personal injury lawsuit. Dissatisfied with Cochran's manner of representation, Tory complained that Cochran was conspiring with the City of Los Angeles against him. Tory threatened Cochran and claimed that he would "settle" his conspiracy claims against Cochran if Cochran quickly paid him $10 million…." Cochran consequently withdrew as Tory's lawyer. Tory made subsequent requests for money, which Cochran ignored.
In the 1990's, Tory and a group of people began picketing outside Cochran's office and the Los Angeles Superior Court. Tory had brought the picketers to these locations. In 2000, Tory wrote to Cochran demanding more money. In October of that year, Cochran filed this lawsuit against Tory and alleged causes of action for defamation and invasion of privacy. A preliminary injunction was granted and the case was tried in March 2002. The trial court held that Cochran was entitled to a permanent injunction. The permanent injunction forever prohibits Tory from all future speech in any public forum, regardless of content or context, about Cochran, an admitted public figure. Tory appealed to the California Court of Appeal, which ultimately affirmed the permanent injunction decision of the lower court. Now the United States Supreme Court must decide whether a permanent injunction as a remedy in a defamation action, preventing all future speech about an admitted public figure, violates the First Amendment.
Questions as Framed for the Court by the Parties
Whether a permanent injunction as a remedy in a defamation action, preventing all future speech about an admitted public figure, violates the First Amendment.
In 1983, Ulysses Tory (Tory) and Javier Gutierrez (Gutierrez) retained Johnnie L. Cochran, Jr. (Cochran) as their attorney in a personal injury lawsuit against the City of Los Angeles. Cochran v. Tory, No. B159437, 2003 WL 22451378, at *1 (Cal.App. 2 Dist., 2003). Cochran filed the action and eventually settled Gutierrez's claim, but not Tory's. Id. Dissatisfied with Cochran's mode of representation, Tory wrote to Cochran, complaining that Cochran was conspiring with the City.