5 CFR 430.208 - Rating performance.
(b)Rating of record procedures for each appraisal program shall include a method for deriving and assigning a summary level as specified in paragraph (d) of this section based on appraisal of performance on critical elements and, as applicable, non-critical elements.
(2) Consideration of non-critical elements shall not result in assigning a Level 1 summary (“ Unacceptable”).
(c) The method for deriving and assigning a summary level may not limit or require the use of particular summary levels (i.e., establish a forced distribution of summary levels). However, methods used to make distinctions among employees or groups of employees such as comparing, categorizing, and ranking employees or groups on the basis of their performance may be used for purposes other than assigning a summary level including, but not limited to, award determinations and promotion decisions.
(1) An appraisal program shall use one of the following patterns of summary levels:
(2) Within any of the patterns shown in paragraph (d)(1) of this section, summary levels shall comply with the following requirements:
(i) Level 1 through Level 5 are ordered categories, with Level 1 as the lowest and Level 5 as the highest;
(ii) Level 1 is “Unacceptable”;
(iii) Level 3 is “Fully Successful” or equivalent; and
(iv) Level 5 is “Outstanding” or equivalent.
(3) The term “Outstanding” shall be used only to describe a Level 5 summary.
(4) The designation of a summary level and its pattern shall be used to provide consistency in describing ratings of record and as a reference point for applying other related regulations, including, but not limited to, assigning additional retention service credit under § 351.504 of this chapter.
(5) Under the provisions of § 351.504(e) of this chapter, the number of years of additional retention service credit established for a summary level of a rating of record shall be applied in a uniform and consistent manner within a competitive area in any given reduction in force, but the number of years may vary:
(i) In different reductions in force;
(ii) In different competitive areas; and
(iii) In different summary level patterns within the same competitive area.
(e) A rating of record of “Unacceptable” (Level 1) shall be reviewed and approved by a higher level management official.
(g) When a rating of record cannot be prepared at the time specified, the appraisal period shall be extended. Once the conditions necessary to complete a rating of record have been met, a rating of record shall be prepared as soon as practicable.
(h) Each rating of record shall cover a specified appraisal period. Agencies shall not carry over a rating of record prepared for a previous appraisal period as the rating of record for a subsequent appraisal period(s) without an actual evaluation of the employee's performance during the subsequent appraisal period.
(i) When either a regular appraisal period or an extended appraisal period ends and any agency-established deadline for providing ratings of record passes or a subsequent rating of record is issued, an agency shall not produce or change retroactively a rating of record that covers that earlier appraisal period except that a rating of record may be changed -
(2) As a result of a grievance, complaint, or other formal proceeding permitted by law or regulation that results in a final determination by appropriate authority that the rating of record must be changed or as part of a bona fide settlement of a formal proceeding; or
- 5 CFR 430.201 — General.
- 5 CFR 430.204 — Agency Performance Appraisal System(s).
- 5 CFR 430.205 — Agency Performance Appraisal Program(s).
- 5 CFR 534.505 — Written Procedures.
- 5 CFR 534.503 — Definitions.
- 5 CFR 351.504 — Credit for Performance.
- 5 CFR 534.507 — Annual Increases in Basic Pay.
- 5 CFR 430.208 — Rating Performance.
- 5 CFR 430.206 — Planning Performance.
- 5 CFR 430.203 — Definitions.
Title 5 published on 2015-12-02.
No entries appear in the Federal Register after this date, for 5 CFR Part 430.