prev | next
ArtI.S8.C12.3 Conscription

Article I, Section 8, Clause 12:

[The Congress shall have Power . . . ] To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years; . . .

The constitutions adopted during the Revolutionary War by at least nine of the states sanctioned compulsory military service.1 Towards the end of the War of 1812, conscription of men for the army was proposed by James Monroe, then Secretary of War, but opposition developed and peace came before the bill could be enacted.2 In 1863, a compulsory draft law was adopted and put into operation without being challenged in the federal courts.3 Yet this was not so with the Selective Service Act of 1917.4 This measure was attacked on the grounds that it tended to deprive the States of the right to “a well-regulated militia,” that the only power of Congress to exact compulsory service was the power to provide for calling forth the militia for the three purposes specified in the Constitution, which did not comprehend service abroad, and finally that the compulsory draft imposed involuntary servitude in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court rejected all of these contentions. It held that the powers of the States with respect to the militia were exercised in subordination to the paramount power of the National Government to raise and support armies, and that the power of Congress to mobilize an army was distinct from its authority to provide for calling the militia and was not qualified or in any wise limited thereby.5

Before the United States entered World War I, the Court had anticipated the objection that compulsory military service would violate the Thirteenth Amendment and had answered it in the following words: “It introduced no novel doctrine with respect of services always treated as exceptional, and certainly was not intended to interdict enforcement of those duties which individuals owe to the State, such as services in the army, militia, on the jury, etc. The great purpose in view was liberty under the protection of effective government, not the destruction of the latter by depriving it of essential powers.” 6 Accordingly, in the Selective Draft Law Cases,7 it dismissed the objection under that Amendment as a contention that was “refuted by its mere statement.” 8

Although the Supreme Court has so far formally declined to pass on the question of the “peacetime” draft,9 its opinions leave no doubt of the constitutional validity of the act. In United States v. O’Brien,10 upholding a statute prohibiting the destruction of selective service registration certificates, the Court, speaking through Chief Justice Earl Warren, thought “[t]he power of Congress to classify and conscript manpower for military service is ‘beyond question.’” 11 In noting Congress’s “broad constitutional power” to raise and regulate armies and navies,12 the Court has specifically observed that the conscription act was passed “pursuant to” the grant of authority to Congress in clauses 12–14.13

Selective Draft Law Cases, 245 U.S. 366, 380 (1918); Cox v. Wood, 247 U.S. 3 (1918). back
245 U.S. at 385. back
245 U.S. at 386–88. The measure was upheld by a state court. Kneedler v. Lane, 45 Pa. St. 238 (1863). back
Act of May 18, 1917, 40 Stat. 76. back
Selective Draft Law Cases, 245 U.S. 366, 381, 382 (1918). back
Butler v. Perry, 240 U.S. 328, 333 (1916) (upholding state law requiring able-bodied men to work on the roads). back
245 U.S. 366 (1918). back
245 U.S. at 390. back
Universal Military Training and Service Act of 1948, 62 Stat. 604, as amended, 50 U.S.C. App. §§ 451–473. Actual conscription was precluded as of July 1, 1973, Pub. L. No. 92-129, 85 Stat. 353, 50 U.S.C. App. § 467(c), and registration was discontinued on March 29, 1975. Pres. Proc. No. 4360, 3 C.F.R. 462 (1971–1975 Compilation), 50 U.S.C. App. § 453 note. Registration, but not conscription, was reactivated in the wake of the invasion of Afghanistan. Pub. L. No. 96-282, 94 Stat. 552 (1980). back
391 U.S. 367 (1968). back
391 U.S. at 377, quoting Lichter v. United States, 334 U.S. 742, 756 (1948). back
Schlesinger v. Ballard, 419 U.S. 498, 510 (1975). back
Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57, 59 (1981). See id. at 64–65. See also Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group, 468 U.S. 841 (1984) (upholding denial of federal financial assistance under Title IV of the Higher Education Act to young men who fail to register for the draft). back