Skip to main content

Supreme Court

A.R.M.P. v. Attorney General's Office

The defendant was seized by police officers at his parents’ domicile for domestic violence against his wife. During the arrest, the defendant proceeded to insult the victim, threaten her, grab her by the hair and spit on her face. The defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment on the count of domestic violence. During his appeal, the defendant had three arguments for repealing his conviction.

A.R.T. v. Attorney General's Office

Mistakenly believing that a stranger was in his house, the defendant began insulting his wife and tried to beat her. He was prevented in succeeding in his attack after an intervention by their son. The defendant was consequently convicted of domestic violence and sentenced to 20 months in prison. Responding to the argument that a lack of force prevents his actions from satisfying the elements of domestic violence as codified in Honduras Penal Code, the Court responded that “intimidation” was within the elements of domestic violence.

Arthur v. Arthur

This Supreme Court case is notable for solidifying the “Jurisprudence of Equality” doctrine as predominant in determining the sharing of marital property upon divorce. Following the termination of the marriage, the wife was granted by the High Court of Accra in May 2010 (i) custody of the children; (ii) ownership of a house and a “half share of the ‘storey building’; and (iii) a half share of ‘the shops at Weija, Accra. The husband appealed the decision to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal set aside and replaced the orders of the High Court.

Attorney General's Office v. P.T.B.L.

In 2005, an 8-year-old girl was grabbed in the street and taken to an inhabited home. There she was sexually assaulted by a man exposing his genitals. The victim’s mother found the child and the defendant in the abandoned home where she physically attacked him, causing him to flee. The defendant was convicted and sentenced to four years of imprisonment for acts of lust. The prosecutor challenged this decision.

Case of Emilio Garay Franco, Acuerdo y Sentencia No. 296 (1996)

Emilio Garay Franco was accused of murdering his mother, María Roque Franco González, in her home on August 3, 1983, at around 11:00 pm. The weapon used to commit the crime was a knife. The accused was sentenced to 30 years in prison. The accused appealed the sentence, but the action was dismissed by the Supreme Court. The Court confirmed the sentence, noting “no hay delito más horrendo” (there is no more horrendous crime) than patricide.

Case of Francisco Ramírez Irala, Acuerdo y Sentencia No. 353 (2011)

In 2008, Francisco Ramírez Irala was found guilty of domestic violence against his wife. The Justice of the Peace ordered the accused to refrain from living at their home or being within 300 meters of their house or any other place that represented a risk for the victim for a period of 60 days. The accused appealed, and the sentence was confirmed. Subsequently, the accused filed a request before the Supreme Court, alleging that the sentence caused him great harm because he was a colonel in the military with an impeccable career and was being evaluated for a promotion. Th

Case of Guido Arturo Villalba and Other, Acuerdo y Sentencia No. 859 (2016)

Clorinda Mora Romero was sentenced to jail for seven years and six months after the lower court of Asunción found that she was guilty with her co-defendant, Guido Arturo Villalba, of human trafficking with the purpose of sexual exploitation. She appealed the sentence, and the court of appeals rejected her motion, confirming the lower court's sentence. Finally, she challenged the decision before the Supreme Court, which dismissed the action in 2016.

Case of Joao María Dos Santos, Acuerdo y Sentencia No. 291 (1997)

S.J.D.S and M.J.D.S (16 and 13 years old) were sexually abused by their father, Joao María Dos Santos, on several occasions. The victims testified that they were forced to have sexual relations with their father. The accused admitted that he raped them. The accused was sentenced to 16 years in prison. His sentence was confirmed by the Supreme Court in 1997.

Case of Juan Alveiro Gómez, Acuerdo y Sentencia No. 45 (1997)

In 1994, a married woman was sexually abused and raped by Juan Aveiro Gómez in her home. Law 104 (dated December 17, 1990) modified Paraguay’s Penal Code to punish the rape of a married woman with prison. The criminal appeals court sentenced the defendant to 12 years in prison. However, the Supreme Court reduced the sentence to eight years in prison on February 20, 1997.

Subscribe to Supreme Court