Skip to main content

Abortion and reproductive health rights

Abortion and reproductive health rights address the legal framework surrounding access to abortion, contraception, maternal health, and reproductive autonomy. This includes laws defining permissible procedures, gestational limits, and the rights of pregnant people.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Prohibition of Discrimination Based on Abortion or the Use of Contraception Under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, Amending Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits covered employers from discriminating against applicants, as well as current and former employees, based on race, gender, color, religion, or national origin. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 (PDA) amended Title VII to include in its prohibition of gender discrimination a prohibition of discrimination based on pregnancy, which includes abortion and the use of contraception.

Family Planning Association of Northern Ireland v. Minister for Health, Social Services and Public Safety

The Northern Ireland Court of Appeal reversed a trial court dismissal of an application by the Family Planning Association of Northern Ireland (FPANI) seeking a declaration that the Northern Ireland Minister for Health, Social Services and Public Safety acted unlawfully in failing to issue advice and/or guidance to women of child-bearing age and to clinicians in Northern Ireland on the availability and provision of termination of pregnancy services in Northern Ireland. 

G 16/2013-16, G 44/2013-14

The local court denied the petitioner’s motion to certify the approval of her female partner to conduct in vitro fertilization with a third person’s semen. The regional court denied the appeal. It held that the wording of the Austrian Reproductive Medicine Act (FMedG) aims to exclude same-sex parenthood. The Supreme Court decided to bring this question to the attention of the Austrian Constitutional Court. The Austrian Constitutional Court decided that certain sections of the FMedG were unconstitutional.

G.M.J. v Attorney General

Here, in a unanimous judgment, the Court of Appeal reversed a decision by the High Court to dismiss a medical negligence claim raised by a woman who underwent a surgical procedure for the removal of her womb and experienced the leaking of urine after the procedure. Appellant had sought damages from medical negligence and lack of proper post-operative care. The Court’s holding clarifies the law on prescription and medical negligence, which are a prominent method through which women try to access the courts when their reproductive health rights are violated.

Gender Equality Act

The Gender Equality Act promotes gender equality for men and women in all parts of society, and seeks to prohibit and provide redress for sex discrimination, harmful practices (including social, cultural, or religious practices that are physically or sexually harmful) and sexual harassment. Under the Act, persons (and the government) are prohibited from treating people less favorably than they would otherwise due to sex. The law defines and criminalizes sexual harassment, including workplace harassment.

Griswold v. Connecticut

The plaintiffs challenged an 1879 Connecticut law, which banned the use of all drugs, medical devices, or other instruments necessary for contraception, by opening a birth control clinic in New Haven, Connecticut. The Supreme Court found that the First, Third, Fourth, and Ninth Amendments established a right of marital privacy against state contraception regulations. As a result, the Court held that the Connecticut law violated this constitutionally established right to privacy, so the law was struck down.

Habeas Corpus 124.306

The Supreme Federal Court of Brazil (STF) revoked the pretrial detention order issued against staff and patients of a clinic that was alleged to have been performing clandestine abortions. The 2ND Panel of STF found that criminal laws against abortion were unconstitutional with respect to the case in hand, and the criminalization of voluntary termination of pregnancy during the first three months was incompatible with the protection of multiple fundamental rights of women. The decision set an important precedent for the sexual and reproductive rights of women in Brazil.

Subscribe to Abortion and reproductive health rights