Ariz. Admin. Code § R6-3-50515 - Working Conditions (v L 515)
A. General (V L 515.05)
1. The term "working conditions" includes all
aspects of the employer-employee relationship, but in this Section it will be
confined to environmental conditions such as light, sanitation,
fellow-employees, etc.
2. A worker
who leaves because of dissatisfaction with working conditions, must show that
one or more of these conditions are substantially below those prevailing in the
area for similar work. Mere dislike, distaste, or inconvenience created by
small variations in working conditions will not establish good cause for
leaving work. The determination generally will turn on a comparison of the
claimant's actions with the degree of tolerance the normal worker would be
expected to exercise before leaving under the same conditions.
3. When an employer imposes unreasonable
demands or working conditions which force a worker to terminate his employment,
the worker would leave with good cause.
4. Before good cause or a compelling personal
reason for leaving can be established, a worker must have attempted to adjust
his grievance prior to leaving unless such an attempt was not
feasible.
B.
Apportionment of work (V L 515.2)
1. An
employer may reasonably alter or add to the job duties of an employee from time
to time. Unless these changes render the work unsuitable, this is not good
cause for leaving. Occasional emergency assignments do not establish good
cause.
2. Assignment of more work
to one employee than another in the same classification does not in itself
establish good cause for leaving. It may be good cause if:
a. The assignment is unreasonably difficult;
or
b. The assignment of work was
made on a discriminatory basis.
C. Fellow employee (V L 515.4)
1. A worker who leaves because of
inharmonious relations with a fellow employee leaves with good cause if he is
established that the conditions were so unpleasant that remaining at work would
create an intolerable work situation for him.
2. In determining whether a situation is
intolerable, the following factors should be considered:
a. Would continued employment create a severe
nervous strain or result in a physical altercation with the other
employee?
b. Was the worker
subjected to extreme verbal abuse or profanity? The importance of profane
language as an adverse working condition varies in different types of
work.
3. A physical
attack by a fellow-employee would be good cause for leaving if the claimant was
clearly not at fault, unless the employer had taken reasonable steps to avoid a
recurrence.
D.
Prevailing conditions for similar work in the area (V L 515.55)
1. A worker who establishes that the actual
conditions of his job were substantially below the prevailing standards in the
area, leaves for good cause.
2. It
will often be difficult to compare conditions in one establishment against
those prevailing in the area for similar work. The adjudicator, in making his
determination, may want to refer to such information as:
union contracts
state or federal law
public health regulations
3. If the conditions are not substandard, but
yet create an undue hardship on the individual worker, he leaves for a
compelling personal reason not attributable to the employer.
E. Production requirement or
quantity of duties (V L 515.6)
1. A worker who
leaves because of the employer's production requirements leaves without good
cause if these requirements are reasonable. The following factors should be
considered in determining reasonableness:
a.
Are the production requirements creating a condition substantially below those
prevailing in the area?
b. Are the
requirements reflected equitably in the worker's wages?
c. Are the requirements discriminatory? See
R6-3-50515(B).
2. When a
worker who leaves because he cannot, for some personal reason, meet an
employer's work requirements, the adjudicator must consider the appropriate
Section of these rules relating to his specific reason for leaving.
F. Supervisor (V L 515.8). When a
worker leaves his job for any reason involving his relations with a supervisor,
the adjudicator will apply the same considerations that apply to relations with
a fellow employee; see
R6-3-50515(C).
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.