Fla. Admin. Code Ann. R. 12D-9.025 - Procedures for Conducting a Hearing; Presentation of Evidence; Testimony of Witnesses
(1) As part of
administrative reviews, the board or special magistrate must:
(a) Review the evidence presented by the
parties;
(b) Determine whether the
evidence presented is admissible;
(c) Admit the evidence that is admissible,
and identify the evidence presented to indicate that it is admitted or not
admitted; and,
(d) Consider the
admitted evidence.
(2)
(a) In these rules, the term "admitted
evidence" means evidence that has been admitted into the record for
consideration by the board or special magistrate. Board and special magistrate
proceedings are not controlled by strict rules of evidence and procedure.
Formal rules of evidence shall not apply, but fundamental due process shall be
observed and shall govern the proceedings.
(b) For administrative reviews, "relevant
evidence" is evidence that is reasonably related, directly or indirectly, to
the statutory criteria that apply to the issue under review. This description
means the evidence meets or exceeds a minimum level of relevance necessary to
be admitted for consideration, but does not necessarily mean that the evidence
has sufficient relevance to legally justify a particular conclusion.
(c) Rebuttal evidence is relevant evidence
used solely to disprove or contradict the original evidence presented by an
opposing party.
(d) As the trier of
fact, the board or special magistrate may independently rule on the
admissibility and use of evidence. If the board or special magistrate has any
questions relating to the admissibility and use of evidence, the board or
special magistrate should consult with the board legal counsel. The basis for
any ruling on admissibility of evidence must be reflected in the record. The
special magistrate may delay ruling on the question during the hearing and
consult with board legal counsel after the hearing.
(3)
(a) In
a board or special magistrate hearing, the petitioner is responsible for
presenting relevant and credible evidence in support of his or her belief that
the property appraiser's determination is incorrect. The property appraiser is
responsible for presenting relevant and credible evidence in support of his or
her determination.
(b) Under
Section 194.301, F.S., "preponderance of
the evidence" is the standard of proof that applies in assessment challenges.
The "clear and convincing evidence" standard of proof no longer applies,
starting with 2009 assessments. A taxpayer shall never have the burden of
proving that the property appraiser's assessment is not supported by any
reasonable hypothesis of a legal assessment.
(4)
(a) No
evidence shall be considered by the board or special magistrate except when
presented and admitted during the time scheduled for the petitioner's hearing,
or at a time when the petitioner has been given reasonable notice. The
petitioner may still present evidence if he or she does not participate in the
evidence exchange. However, if the property appraiser asks in writing for
specific evidence before the hearing in connection with a filed petition, and
the petitioner has this evidence and refuses to provide it to the property
appraiser, the evidence cannot be presented by the petitioner or accepted for
consideration by the board or special magistrate. These requirements are more
specifically described in paragraph (f), below.
(b) If a party submits evidence to the board
clerk prior to the hearing, the board or special magistrate shall not review or
consider such evidence prior to the hearing.
(c) In order to be reviewed by the board or
special magistrate, any evidence filed with the board clerk shall be brought to
the hearing by the party. This requirement shall not apply where:
1. A petitioner does not appear at a hearing
on a "portability" assessment difference transfer petition in which the
previous homestead is the subject of the petition and is located in a county
other than the county where the new homestead is located. Requirements specific
to hearings on such petitions are set forth in subsection
12D-9.028(6),
F.A.C., or
2. A petitioner has
indicated that he or she does not wish to appear at the hearing but would like
for the board or special magistrate to consider evidence submitted by the
petitioner.
(d) A
petitioner who has indicated that he or she does not wish to appear at the
hearing, but would like for the board or special magistrate to consider his or
her evidence, shall submit his or her evidence to the board clerk before the
hearing. The board clerk shall:
1. Keep the
petitioner's evidence as part of the petition file,
2. Notify the board or special magistrate
before or at the hearing that the petitioner has indicated he or she will not
appear at the hearing, but would like for the board or special magistrate to
consider his or her evidence at the hearing; and,
3. Give the evidence to the board or special
magistrate at the beginning of the hearing.
(e) The board clerk may provide an electronic
system for the filing and retrieval of evidence for the convenience of the
parties, but such evidence shall not be considered part of the record and shall
not be reviewed by the board or special magistrate until presented at a
hearing. Any exchange of evidence should occur between the parties and such
evidence is not part of the record until presented by the offering party and
deemed admissible at the hearing.
(f)
1. No
petitioner shall present for consideration, nor shall the board or special
magistrate accept for consideration, testimony or other evidentiary materials
that were specifically requested of the petitioner in writing by the property
appraiser in connection with a filed petition, of which the petitioner had
knowledge and denied to the property appraiser. Such evidentiary materials
shall be considered timely if provided to the property appraiser no later than
fifteen (15) days before the hearing in accordance with the exchange of
evidence rules in Rule
12D-9.020, F.A.C., and, if
provided to the property appraiser less than fifteen (15) days before the
hearing, shall be considered timely if the board or special magistrate
determines they were provided a reasonable time before the hearing. A
petitioner's ability to introduce the evidence, requested of the petitioner in
writing by the property appraiser, is lost if not provided to the property
appraiser as described in this paragraph. This provision does not preclude
rebuttal evidence that was not specifically requested of the petitioner by the
property appraiser. For purposes of this rule and Rule
12D-9.020, F.A.C.,
reasonableness shall be assumed if the property appraiser does not object.
Otherwise, reasonableness shall be determined by whether the material can be
reviewed, investigated, and responded to or rebutted in the time frame
remaining before the hearing. If a petitioner has acted in good faith and not
denied evidence to the property appraiser prior to the hearing, as provided by
Section 194.034(1)(h),
F.S., but wishes to submit evidence at the hearing which is of a nature that
would require investigation or verification by the property appraiser, then the
special magistrate may allow the hearing to be recessed and, if necessary,
rescheduled so that the property appraiser may review such evidence.
2. A property appraiser shall not present
undisclosed evidence that was not supplied to the petitioner as required under
the evidence exchange rule, Rule
12D-9.020, F.A.C. The remedy for
such noncompliance shall be a rescheduling of the hearing to allow the
petitioner an opportunity to review the information of the property
appraiser.
(g) An
appraisal report shall not be submitted as evidence in a value adjustment board
proceeding in any tax year in which the person who performed the appraisal
serves as a special magistrate to that county value adjustment board for the
same tax year. Accordingly, in that tax year the board and any special
magistrate in that county shall not admit such appraisal report into evidence
and shall not consider any such appraisal report.
(5) When testimony is presented at a hearing,
each party shall have the right to cross-examine any witness.
(6)
(a) By
agreement of the parties entered in the record, the board or special magistrate
may leave the record open and postpone completion of the hearing to a date
certain to allow a party to collect and provide additional relevant and
credible evidence. Such postponements shall be limited to instances where,
after completing original presentations of evidence, the parties agree to the
collection and submittal of additional, specific factual evidence for
consideration by the board or special magistrate. In lieu of completing the
hearing, upon agreement of the parties the board or special magistrate is
authorized to consider such evidence without further hearing.
(b) If additional hearing time is necessary,
the hearing must be completed at the date, place, and time agreed upon for
presenting the additional evidence to the board or special magistrate for
consideration.
(c) In a petition to
decrease the just value, the following limitations shall apply if the property
appraiser seeks to present additional evidence that was unexpectedly discovered
and that would increase the assessment.
1. The
board or special magistrate shall ensure that such additional evidence is
limited to a correction of a factual error discovered in the physical
attributes of the petitioned property; a change in the property appraiser's
judgment is not such a correction and shall not justify an increase in the
assessment.
2. A notice of revised
proposed assessment shall be made and provided to the petitioner in accordance
with the notice provisions set out in Florida Statutes for notices of proposed
property taxes.
3. Along with the
notice of revised proposed assessment, the property appraiser shall provide to
the petitioner a copy of the revised property record card containing
information relevant to the computation of the revised proposed assessment,
with confidential information redacted. The property appraiser shall provide
such revised property record card to the petitioner either by sending it to the
petitioner or by notifying the petitioner how to obtain it online.
4. A new hearing shall be scheduled and
notice of the hearing shall be sent to the petitioner.
5. The evidence exchange procedures in Rule
12D-9.020, F.A.C., shall be
available.
6. The back assessment
procedure in Section 193.092, F.S., shall be used for
any assessment already certified.
(d) In a petition to increase the just value,
the property appraiser may provide an increased just value to the petitioner
before the hearing or at the hearing. In such case, if the petitioner agrees
with the property appraiser's increased just value, the petitioner may settle
or withdraw the petition. If the petitioner does not agree with the property
appraiser's increased just value, the hearing shall not be canceled on that
ground. This provision applies only in petitions to increase the just
value.
(7)
(a) The board or special magistrate shall
receive, identify for the record, and retain all exhibits presented during the
hearing and send them to the board clerk along with the recommended decision or
final decision. Upon agreement of the parties, the board clerk is authorized to
make an electronic representation of evidence that is difficult to store or
maintain.
(b) The board or special
magistrate shall have the authority, at a hearing, to ask questions at any time
of either party, the witnesses, or board staff. When asking questions, the
board or special magistrate shall not show bias for or against any party or
witness. The board or special magistrate shall limit the content of any
question asked of a party or witness to matters reasonably related, directly or
indirectly, to matters already in the record.
(c) Representatives of interested
municipalities may be heard as provided in Section
193.116,
F.S.
(8) Unless a board
or special magistrate determines that additional time is necessary, the board
or special magistrate shall conclude all hearings at the end of the time
scheduled for the hearing. If a hearing is not concluded by the end of the time
scheduled, the board or special magistrate shall determine the amount of
additional time needed to conclude the hearing.
(a) If the board or special magistrate
determines that the amount of additional time needed to conclude the hearing
would not unreasonably disrupt other hearings, the board or special magistrate
is authorized to proceed with conclusion of the hearing.
(b) If the board or special magistrate
determines that the amount of additional time needed to conclude the hearing
would unreasonably disrupt other hearings, the board or special magistrate
shall so state on the record and shall notify the board clerk to reschedule the
conclusion of the hearing to a time as scheduled and noticed by the board
clerk.
(9) The board or
special magistrate shall not be required to make, at any time during a hearing,
any oral or written finding, conclusion, decision, or reason for decision. The
board or special magistrate has the discretion to determine whether to make
such determinations during a hearing or to consider the petition and evidence
further after the hearing and then make such determinations.
(10) For purposes of reporting board action
on decisions and on the notice of tax impact, the value as reflected on the
initial roll shall mean the property appraiser's determination as presented at
the commencement of the hearing, or as reduced by the property appraiser during
the hearing, or as increased by the property appraiser during the hearing as
provided in subsection (6), but before a decision by the board or a recommended
decision by the special magistrate. See Rule
12D-9.038,
F.A.C.
Notes
Rulemaking Authority 194.011(5), 194.034(1), 195.027(1) FS. Law Implemented 193.092, 194.011, 194.032, 194.034, 194.035 FS.
New 3-30-10, Amended 6-14-16, 9-19-17, 8-17-21, 11-26-23.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.