Fla. Admin. Code Ann. R. 23-21.015 - Effective Parole Release Date Interview Procedure
(1)
Within ninety (90) days before the effective parole release date interview, the
Commission shall send written notice to the sentencing judge of any inmate who
has been scheduled for an effective parole release date interview. If the
sentencing judge is no longer serving, the notice must be sent to the chief
judge of the circuit in which the offender was sentenced. The chief judge can
designate any circuit judge within the circuit to act in place of the
sentencing judge. Within thirty (30) days after receipt of the Commission's
notice, the sentencing judge or the designee shall send to the Commission
notice of objection to parole release, if the judge objects to such release. If
there is objection by the judge such objection may constitute good cause in
exceptional circumstances as described in section 947.173, F.S., and the
Commission can schedule a subsequent interview per rule 23-21.013, F.A.C.,
extending the presumptive parole release date beyond that time. The same
procedure will be followed with any subsequent review outlined herein. If the
judge remains silent with respect to parole release, the Commission can
authorize an effective parole release date. This procedure applies if the
Commission desires to consider the establishment of an effective release date
without delivery of the effective parole release date interview. Notice of the
effective release date must be sent to the sentencing judge and either the
judge's response to the notice must be received or the time period allowed for
such response must have lapsed before the Commission can authorize an effective
release date. Within ninety (90) days before an inmate's presumptive parole
release date, the Commission shall direct a Commission Investigator to
interview the inmate for purposes of making a recommendation to the Commission
on whether or not to authorize an effective parole release date and to
establish a parole release plan.
(2) The Commission Investigator shall
interview the inmate and discuss the inmate's institutional conduct. The
Commission Investigator shall request the inmate present his parole release
plan but shall not comment on the acceptability or suitability of that plan. If
the inmate has no plan, the Commission Investigator shall inform the inmate
that the absence of a satisfactory parole release plan may cause the Commission
to extend the effective parole release date up to one year until a satisfactory
parole release plan has been developed. At the close of the effective parole
release date interview, the inmate shall be orally informed of the
investigator's final recommendation and shall be requested to sign an
acknowledgment of presence at the effective parole release date
interview.
(3) For inmates serving
parole-eligible sentences imposed by a court of this state and housed in a
facility outside Florida, the Commission shall request, through the Department
of Corrections' Interstate Compact Office, an inmate progress report and any
additional information the Commission needs from the other state. The
Department of Corrections shall forward the Commission's Inmate Input Form to
the other state for the inmate to provide comments to the Commission. The
inmate may include material(s) which the inmate wants the Commission to
consider. The Commission investigator shall reduce the recommendation to
writing and send it to the Chair within 10 days of receipt of the out-of-state
materials.
(4) Vacation of
presumptive or effective parole release date: The exiting of an inmate from the
incarceration portion of his sentence, which shall include bond, escape,
expiration of sentence, or transfer to a mental health facility, shall vacate
any established presumptive parole release date. Any subsequent return to
incarceration shall require an initial interview to establish a presumptive
parole release date. Provided, however, inmates returning to court for
modification of a previously imposed sentence or as witnesses shall not have
their presumptive parole release dates vacated. Inmates returning to courts
outside of Florida's jurisdiction, i.e., Federal or other state, shall not have
their presumptive parole release dates vacated. However, information resulting
from disposition of cases in court may be used as new information in accordance
with applicable law and these rules. Inmates transferred to a Mentally
Disordered Sexual Offender Program shall not have their presumptive parole
release dates vacated.
(5)
Extension of presumptive parole release date: The pending prosecution of a
criminal offense in a Florida Court, supported by information or indictment,
alleged to have occurred during the service of the present sentence, may result
in the extending of a presumptive or effective parole release date until
resolution of the pending prosecution. The Commission shall, upon notice that
the pending prosecution is completed, schedule the inmate for an
interview.
(6) The Commission
Investigator shall reduce the recommendation regarding the inmate's
institutional conduct to writing and forward the recommendation to the
Commission. The Commission Investigator shall inform the Commission if, at the
effective parole release date interview, new information, either favorable or
detrimental, was discovered which might affect the presumptive parole release
date. The Commission Investigator shall forward the inmate's release plan to
the Commission.
(7) Within thirty
(30) days after receipt of the inmate's parole release plan at the Commission
headquarters, the full Commission shall determine whether to authorize the
effective parole release date. The inmate must be notified of the decision in
writing within thirty (30) days after the decision of the Commission.
(8) If the full Commission finds that the
inmate's parole release plan is unsatisfactory, this finding can constitute new
information and good cause in exceptional circumstances as described in section
947.173, F.S., under which the Commission can extend a presumptive parole
release date for not more than one year. The Commission can review any
subsequently proposed parole release plan at any time.
(9) The decision whether to authorize an
effective parole release date requires a two-part analysis. In Part I the
Commission shall determine whether new information has been gathered which
requires modification of the presumptive parole release date. Should the
Commission decide to modify the presumptive parole release date it shall enter
a written order extending the presumptive parole release date. Additionally,
the order shall state, with particularity, the reason or reasons for extending
the presumptive parole release date and shall inform the inmate of the date
scheduled for his next interview.
(10) Where the Commission does not modify the
presumptive parole release date during Part I of the effective review process,
it shall proceed to Part II of the effective parole release date review. During
this portion of the review, the Commission shall determine whether the inmate
meets the criteria for parole release under the provisions of section 947.18,
F.S. This determination is to be based upon a review of the entire official
record in the inmate's case. If the inmate is found to meet the criteria for
parole release, an effective parole release date should be authorized. If the
inmate is found to be ineligible for parole release, however, the Commission
shall enter an order declining to authorize the effective parole release date
and referring the case to the Commission for extraordinary review.
(11) If the Commission establishes an
effective parole release date, the Commission shall reduce the term and
conditions of the inmate's parole to writing and inform the inmate of those
conditions and term.
(12) In
establishing the term of parole, the Commission shall examine the inmate's
sentence structure for the purpose of determining the existence of consecutive
sentences. If it is discovered that consecutive sentences exist, the parole
term shall be established for the maximum of the total sentence structure. In
all cases, if the term of parole exceeds two years the Commission shall advise
the parolee in writing of the reasons for the extended term.
(13) When new information is received by the
Commission subsequent to the grant of parole, to include an unsatisfactory
release plan, unsatisfactory institutional conduct, or any other new
information previously not available to the Commission at the time of the
effective parole release date interview that would impact the Commission's
decision to grant parole, the effective parole release date may be postponed by
any Commissioner as provided in rule 23-21.019, F.A.C.
(14) If an inmate refuses parole, the
Commission shall nullify the grant of parole and the presumptive parole release
date may be extended up to the maximum release date. The Commission shall
continue to interview the inmate per rule 23-21.013, F.A.C. Should an inmate
waive his effective interview or at the time of the effective interview the
inmate indicates his unwillingness to accept parole, the presumptive parole
release date may be extended up to his maximum release date. The Commission
shall continue to interview the inmate per rule 23-21.013,
F.A.C.
Notes
Rulemaking Authority 947.07, 947.20 FS. Law Implemented 947.1745, 947.24 FS.
New 9-10-81, Amended 10-1-82, 8-1-83, Formerly 23-21.15, Amended 1-26-93, 1-5-94, 8-16-94, 8-17-06, 2-3-14, 9-10-18.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.