Fla. Admin. Code Ann. R. 27P-19.009 - Selection Criteria for Competitive Grants
(1) The review committee shall review all
applications that are received by the noticed application deadline and that
comply with the application procedures and requirements set forth in this rule.
Applications that are either not received by the noticed application deadline
or that do not comply with the application procedures and requirements set
forth in this rule shall be rejected. Received means delivery by hand,
certified mail, electronically transmitted (disk or on-line) or courier to the
location designated in the Notice of Fund Availability no later than 4:00 p.m.,
Eastern Time, on the final day of the application period. Facsimile
transmissions shall not be accepted.
(2) Applications shall be scored by the
review committee independently and the scores shall be totaled and averaged.
Thereafter, the committee shall evaluate the scores and arrive at preliminary
scores and resulting rankings. Preliminary scores and resulting rankings shall
be prepared within each category based upon the total number of points earned
with the overall highest number of points determining priority for funding. The
review committee shall, within 75 days of the application deadline date, post
preliminary scores and resulting rankings on the Division of Emergency
Management website www.floridadisaster.org. Upon
determination, final scores and resulting rankings will be posted on the
Division of Emergency Management website, www.floridadisaster.org. Funds shall be
offered to the Applicant with the overall highest score, then to the Applicant
with the next overall highest score, and so on, until all funds have been
offered and accepted, or all eligible applications have been funded, or
insufficient funds remain to fund an eligible project. The Division may offer
to fund all or part of the project or all or part of the amount requested in an
application. Applicants shall be given 21 days to accept or reject a proposed
award. Written notice of acceptance shall be delivered to the Division offices
designated in the notice of award along with a complete proposal, revised
budget, timeline and a list of project items. In the event that an Applicant
fails to accept or reject a proposed award offered for the Emergency Management
Competitive Grant Program or the Municipal Competitive Grant Program within the
specified time, then the funds offered shall revert to the Trust
Fund.
(3) The review committee may
use other Division staff, staff from other state and regional agencies and
local governments that have not applied for funds, or professional consultants,
to assist in reviewing an application.
(4) In the event of a tie, the review
committee shall give first priority to the application which provides the
largest amount of cash match of other funds for the project, and, if a tie
still results, then preference shall be given in accordance with Section 18,
Chapter 92-132, Laws of Florida, to the project exclusively located or to be
performed in a county or municipality which has been adversely affected by an
environmental cleanup initiative conducted by the state, or is located in a
Front Porch Community.
(5)
Applications will be accepted for awards in four separate categories. A
municipality shall not apply for funding for the same project from both the
funding available under the Emergency Management Competitive Grant Program and
the funding available under the Municipal Competitive Grant Program. Each
application must designate one, and only one, of the categories noted in this
rule. Failure to designate a category, or designating a category that is
unrelated to the proposed project, shall result in rejection of the
application. If sufficient numbers of applications that achieve the minimum
score are received, at least one application will be funded from each category.
The categories are:
(a) Projects that will
promote public education on disaster preparedness and recovery
issues.
(b) Projects that will
enhance coordination of relief efforts of statewide private sector
organizations, including public-private business partnership efforts.
(c) Projects that will improve the training
and operations capabilities of agencies assigned lead or support
responsibilities in the State Comprehensive Emergency Management
Plan.
(d) Other projects that will
further state and local emergency management objectives designated as
priorities in the applicable Notice of Fund Availability.
(6) Applications shall be awarded points and
ranked using the following criteria:
(a)
Extent to which the proposed project is consistent with and furthers the State
Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan and the applicable local comprehensive
emergency management plan or plans. [Maximum score 100 points]
(b) Proposed project method and approach.
[Maximum score 100 points]
(c)
Amount of eligible match supplied by the applicant for the proposed project.
[Maximum score 50 points]
(d)
Experience and ability applied to the project. [Maximum score 25
points]
(e) Immediacy of tangible
emergency management benefits (short term projects, i.e. - less than 12 months
in duration), or, long term emergency management benefits coupled with the
availability of resources to continue implementation of the project past the
term of the award (long term projects, i.e. - duration of 12 months or longer).
Identify the emergency management organizations or the targeted population area
whose emergency management needs will be directly benefitted by the project or
both if applicable. [Maximum score 75 points]
(f) Extent to which the proposed project
addresses a demonstrated emergency management need. [Maximum score 50
points]
(g) Extent to which the
proposed project addresses an emergency management priority, as identified in
the Notice of Fund Availability. [Maximum score 100 points] These points are
only available for applications submitted under paragraph
27P-19.009(5)(d),
F.A.C.
(7) Points shall
be awarded based upon the evidence contained in the application. No points
shall be awarded based upon information not contained in the application.
Applicants shall supply in their project application all information which they
desire to be evaluated for an award of points.
(8) Regardless of their competitive ranking,
applications that do not score at least 300 points shall be ineligible for
funding.
Notes
Rulemaking Authority 252.35(2)(x), 252.373 FS. Law Implemented 252.35, 252.373, 252.38 FS.
New 1-12-94, Amended 6-21-95, 11-13-96, 10-11-98, 10-11-00, 10-22-02, 11-27-03, 1-3-06, Formerly 9G-19.009.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.