(1) Water segments shall be placed on the
Planning List if, using objective and credible data, as defined by the
requirements specified in this section, the number of samples that do not meet
an applicable water quality criterion due to pollutant discharges is greater
than or equal to the number listed in Table 1 for the given sample size. For
sample sizes up to 500, waters are placed on the Planning List when 10 percent
or more of the samples do not meet the applicable criteria with a minimum of an
80 percent confidence level using a binomial distribution. For sample sizes
greater than 500, the Department shall calculate the number of samples not
meeting the criterion that are needed to list the waterbody with an 80 percent
confidence level for the given sample size using the binomial distribution.
|
Table 1: Planning
List
|
|
Minimum number of samples not
meeting an applicable water quality criterion needed to put a water on the
Planning List with at least 80% confidence.
|
|
Sample sizes
|
Are listed if they have at least this # of samples
that do not meet a criterion
|
Sample sizes
|
Are listed if they have at least this # of samples
that do not meet a criterion
|
|
From
|
To
|
From
|
To
|
|
10
|
15
|
3
|
256
|
264
|
31
|
|
16
|
23
|
4
|
265
|
273
|
32
|
|
24
|
31
|
5
|
274
|
282
|
33
|
|
32
|
39
|
6
|
283
|
292
|
34
|
|
40
|
47
|
7
|
293
|
301
|
35
|
|
48
|
56
|
8
|
302
|
310
|
36
|
|
57
|
65
|
9
|
311
|
320
|
37
|
|
66
|
73
|
10
|
321
|
329
|
38
|
|
74
|
82
|
11
|
330
|
338
|
39
|
|
83
|
91
|
12
|
339
|
348
|
40
|
|
92
|
100
|
13
|
349
|
357
|
41
|
|
101
|
109
|
14
|
358
|
367
|
42
|
|
110
|
118
|
15
|
368
|
376
|
43
|
|
119
|
126
|
16
|
377
|
385
|
44
|
|
127
|
136
|
17
|
386
|
395
|
45
|
|
137
|
145
|
18
|
396
|
404
|
46
|
|
146
|
154
|
19
|
405
|
414
|
47
|
|
155
|
163
|
20
|
415
|
423
|
48
|
|
164
|
172
|
21
|
424
|
432
|
49
|
|
173
|
181
|
22
|
433
|
442
|
50
|
|
182
|
190
|
23
|
443
|
451
|
51
|
|
191
|
199
|
24
|
452
|
461
|
52
|
|
200
|
208
|
25
|
462
|
470
|
53
|
|
209
|
218
|
26
|
471
|
480
|
54
|
|
219
|
227
|
27
|
481
|
489
|
55
|
|
228
|
236
|
28
|
490
|
499
|
56
|
|
237
|
245
|
29
|
500
|
500
|
57
|
|
246
|
255
|
30
|
|
|
|
(2)
The Department's Florida Storage and Retrieval (FLASTORET) database, or its
successors, shall be the primary source of data used for determining whether
samples do not meet water quality criteria. As required by subsection
62-40.540(3),
F.A.C., the Department, other state agencies, the Water Management Districts,
and local governments collecting surface water quality data in Florida shall
enter the data into FLASTORET, or its successors, within one year of
collection. Other sampling entities that want to ensure their data will be
considered for evaluation should ensure their data are entered into FLASTORET,
or its successors. The Department shall consider data submitted to the
Department from other sources and databases if the data meet the sufficiency
and data quality requirements of this section.
(3) Unless information presented to the
Department demonstrates otherwise, data older than ten years are not
representative of current conditions and shall not be used to develop Planning
Lists except to evaluate historical trends. Any determinations by the
Department to use data older than 10 years shall be documented, and the
documentation shall include the basis for the decision that the data are
representative of current conditions. Further, more recent data shall take
precedence over older data if:
(a) The newer
data indicate a change in water quality and this change is related to changes
in anthropogenic pollutant loading to the watershed or improved pollution
control mechanisms in the watershed contributing to the assessed area,
or
(b) The Department determines
that the older data do not meet the data quality requirements of this section
or are no longer representative of the water quality of the segment. The
Department shall note for the record that the older data were excluded and
provide details about why the older data were excluded.
(4) To place a water segment on the Planning
List using Table 1, a water segment shall have a minimum of ten samples for the
ten-year period, with at least five temporally independent samples. To be
treated as a temporally independent sample, samples shall be at least one week
apart, regardless of whether the samples are collected at different locations
within the segment.
(a) For parameters other
than dissolved oxygen (DO), samples collected at the same location less than
four days apart shall be considered as one sample, with the median value used
to represent the sampling period. However, if individual values exceed acutely
toxic levels as listed in Table 2, then the worst-case value shall be used to
represent the sampling period. The worst-case value is both the minimum and
maximum for pH, or the maximum value for other parameters.
(b) For lakes, the daily average DO level
shall be calculated as the average of measurements collected in the upper two
meters of the water column at the same location and on the same day. For all
other fresh waters, the daily average freshwater DO level shall be calculated
as the average of all measurements collected in the water column at the same
location and on the same day. If any individual DO measurement is greater than
100 percent saturation, 100 percent shall be substituted for that value for the
purpose of calculating daily averages.
(c) The daily average freshwater DO criteria
shall be assessed preferentially using daily average values calculated from
full days of diel monitoring data. A full day of diel data shall consist of 24
hours of measurements collected at a regular time interval of no longer than
one hour. If diel monitoring data are not available, instantaneous samples may
be used to assess the DO criterion by comparing the instantaneous value with a
time-of-day-specific translation of the daily average criterion. To determine
the time-of-day-specific translation of the daily average criterion, the time
(T) at which the DO sample was taken (in minutes past midnight) is entered into
the appropriate equation below for the applicable region and waterbody type.
The actual DO measurement collected at a given time is assessed against the
calculated time-of-day-specific translation for that time, and if the
instantaneous DO is greater than or equal to the calculated value, the daily
average DO criterion is achieved.
|
Region
|
Equations for Time-of-Day-Specific
Translation of the Daily Average DO Criterion
|
|
Streams
|
|
|
Northeast + Big Bend
|
1.1844 x 10-13 *
T5 - 4.1432 x 10-10 *
T4 + 4.7729 x 10-7 *
T3 - 1.9692 x 10-4*
T2 + 0.02314 * T + 31.24
|
|
Peninsula + Everglades
|
1.9888 x 10-13 *
T5 - 6.8941 x 10-10 *
T4 + 7.8373 x 10-7 *
T3 - 3.1598 x 10-4*
T2 + 0.03551 * T + 33.43
|
|
Panhandle West
|
9.0851 x 10-14 *
T5 - 2.9941 x 10-10 *
T4 + 3.1560 x 10-7 *
T3 - 1.0851 x 10-4*
T2 + 0.006285 * T + 65.61
|
|
Lakes
|
|
|
Northeast + Big Bend
|
1.4578 x 10-13 *
T5 - 5.5607 x 10-10 *
T4 + 7.0683 x 10-7 *
T3 - 3.1879 x 10-4*
T2 + 0.02817 * T + 34.19
|
|
Peninsula + Everglades
|
1.3709 x 10-13 *
T5 - 5.0496 x 10-10 *
T4 + 6.1352 x 10-7 *
T3 - 2.5817 x 10-4*
T2 + 0.01960 * T + 37.14
|
|
Panhandle West
|
7.1190 x 10-14 *
T5 - 2.6420 x 10-10 *
T4 + 3.2247 x 10-7 *
T3 - 1.3607 x 10-4*
T2 + 0.01071 * T + 66.35
|
(d)
If multiple instantaneous DO samples are available in a day, the
time-of-day-specific translation of the daily average criterion will be
calculated for each individual sample. Achievement of the daily average DO
criteria will be assessed by comparing the average of the actual DO
measurements collected at each time against the average of the calculated
time-of-day-specific translations for each time. If the average of the measured
DO values is greater than or equal to the average of the time-of-day-specific
translations of the criteria, the daily average DO criterion is achieved. An
average of multiple daily values calculated in this manner will be considered
as a single sample for assessment purposes.
(e) Samples collected within 200 meters of
each other will be considered the same station or location, unless there is a
tributary, an outfall, or significant change in the hydrography of the
water.
(f) Samples collected from
different stations within a water segment shall be assessed as separate samples
even if collected at the same time.
(g) In making the determination to list water
segments, the Department shall consider ambient background conditions,
including seasonal and other natural variations.
|
Table 2. Acutely Toxic Levels
for Parameters with Aquatic Life-Based Criteria
|
|
Parameter
|
Units
|
Freshwater Value
|
Marine Value
|
|
Aldrin
|
ug/L
|
3
|
1.3
|
|
Aluminum
|
ug/L
|
750
|
N/A
|
|
Arsenic
|
ug/L
|
340
|
69
|
|
Cadmium
|
ug/L
|
exp((1.0166*(lnH))-3.924)
|
40
|
|
Carbaryl
|
ug/L
|
2.1
|
1.6
|
|
Chlordane
|
ug/L
|
2.4
|
0.09
|
|
Chlorine
|
ug/L
|
19
|
13
|
|
Chlorpyrifos
|
ug/L
|
0.083
|
0.011
|
|
Chromium III
|
ug/L
|
exp((0.8190(lnH))+3.7256)
|
N/A
|
|
Chromium VI
|
ug/L
|
16
|
1100
|
|
Copper
|
ug/L
|
exp((0.9422*(lnH))-1.700)
|
5.8
|
|
Cyanide
|
ug/L
|
22
|
1
|
|
DDT
|
ug/L
|
1.1
|
0.13
|
|
Diazinon
|
ug/L
|
0.17
|
0.82
|
|
Dieldrin
|
ug/L
|
0.24
|
0.71
|
|
Endosulfan
|
ug/L
|
0.22
|
0.034
|
|
Endrin
|
ug/L
|
0.086
|
0.037
|
|
Heptachlor
|
ug/L
|
0.52
|
0.053
|
|
Lead
|
ug/L
|
exp((1.273(lnH))-1.460)
|
221
|
|
Lindane
|
ug/L
|
0.95
|
0.16
|
|
Nickel
|
ug/L
|
exp((0.8460(lnH))+2.255)
|
75
|
|
Nonylphenol
|
ug/L
|
28
|
7
|
|
Pentachlorophenol
|
ug/L
|
exp(1.005(pH)-4.869)
|
13
|
|
Selenium
|
ug/L
|
N/A
|
290
|
|
Silver
|
ug/L
|
exp((1.72(lnH))-6.59)
|
2.2
|
|
Toxaphene
|
ug/L
|
0.73
|
0.21
|
|
Zinc
|
ug/L
|
exp((0.8473(lnH))+0.884)
|
95
|
(5) For assessment of the portions of the
Suwannee, Withlacoochee (North), and Santa Fe Rivers utilized by the Gulf
Sturgeon, and in the portions of the Santa Fe and New Rivers utilized by the
Oval Pigtoe Mussel, waters will be listed on the Planning List when more than
50 percent of the measurements are below the applicable median or more than 10
percent of the daily average values are below the applicable 10th percentile
value at a minimum of a 80 percent confidence level using the binomial
distribution. The applicable median and 10th percentile values are specified by
river segment in Appendix I of the "
Technical Support Document:
Derivation of Dissolved Oxygen Criteria to Protect Aquatic Life in Florida's
Fresh and Marine Waters" (DEP-SAS-001/13), dated March, 2013 (
http://www.flrules.org/Gateway/reference.asp?No=Ref-02961),
which is incorporated by reference herein. Copies of Appendix I may be obtained
by writing to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 2600 Blair
Stone Road, MS #6511, Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400.
(6) For predominantly marine waters, the
Department shall evaluate the daily average DO criterion using Table 1 set
forth in subsection
62-303.320(1),
F.A.C., above, and shall also evaluate whether the 7-day and 30-day average
criteria have been achieved during the planning period. A water segment shall
be placed on the Planning List for potential DO impairment if the number of
samples that do not meet the daily average DO criterion is greater than or
equal to the number listed in Table 1 for the given sample size, or if it has a
weekly average value below the 7-day average DO criterion or a monthly average
value below the 30-day DO criterion in the planning period.
(a) If any individual DO measurement is
greater than 100 percent saturation, 100 percent shall be substituted for that
value for the purpose of calculating daily, weekly and monthly
averages.
(b) Where DO values are
collected at multiple depths at a given station and time, the average of the
values shall be used to represent the measurements unless any of the individual
DO values are less than 2 mg/l, in which case the lower 25th percentile of the
measured values shall be used.
(c)
For assessment purposes, the 7-day average DO percent saturation shall be
calculated as a weekly average using a minimum of three full days of diel data
collected within a week, or a minimum of ten grab samples collected over at
least three days within a week, with each sample measured at least four hours
apart.
(d) For assessment purposes,
the 30-day average DO percent saturation shall be calculated as a monthly
average using a minimum of three full days of diel data, with each diel
sampling conducted in different weeks of the month, or grab samples collected
from a minimum of ten different days of the month.
(e) A full day of diel data shall consist of
24 hours of measurements collected at a regular time interval of no longer than
one hour.
(7)
Notwithstanding the requirements of subsection (4), water segments shall be
included on the Planning List if:
(a) There
are less than ten samples for the segment, but there are three or more
temporally independent samples that do not meet an applicable water quality
criterion, or
(b) More than one
sample do not meet an acute toxicity-based water quality criterion listed in
subsection
62-302.500(1),
F.A.C., or a water quality criterion for a synthetic organic compound or
synthetic pesticide in any three year period.
(8) Values that exceed possible physical or
chemical measurement constraints (pH greater than 14, for example) or that
represent data transcription errors shall be excluded from the assessment.
Outliers identified through statistical procedures shall be evaluated to
determine whether they represent valid measures of water quality. If the
Department determines that they are not valid, they shall be excluded from the
assessment. However, the Department shall note for the record that the data
were excluded and explain why they were excluded.
(9) The Department shall consider all readily
available water quality data collected and analyzed in accordance with Chapter
62-160, F.A.C. If requested, the sampling agency must provide to the Department
all of the data quality assessment elements listed in Table 2 of the
Department's Guidance Document "Data Quality Assessment Elements for
Identification of Impaired Surface Waters" (DEP EAS 01-01, April 2001) (
http://www.flrules.org/Gateway/reference.asp?No=Ref-06034),
which is incorporated by reference herein. Copies of the document may be
obtained by writing to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 2600
Blair Stone Road, MS #6511, Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400.
(10) For the assessment of metals criteria:
(a) Surface water data for mercury shall be
collected and analyzed using clean sampling and analytical techniques; and,
(b) The corresponding hardness
value shall be required for freshwater metals criteria that are hardness
dependent. If the ambient hardness value is less than 25 mg/L as
CaCO3, then a hardness value of 25 will be used to
calculate the criteria. If data are not used due to sampling or analytical
techniques or because hardness data were not available, the Department shall
note for the record that data were excluded and explain why they were
excluded.
(11) For the
assessment of the DO criteria, any DO data collected as a concentration in mg/l
shall be converted to percent saturation using the temperature and salinity
measured at the same location within fifteen minutes of the DO measurement.
Percent DO saturation shall be calculated using the method in Section 5.4 of
the "
Technical Support Document: Derivation of
Dissolved Oxygen Criteria to Protect Aquatic Life in Florida's Fresh and Marine
Waters, " (DEP-SAS-001/13), dated March, 2013 (
http://www.flrules.org/Gateway/reference.asp?No=Ref-02958),
which is incorporated by reference herein. Copies of Section 5.4 may be
obtained by writing to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 2600
Blair Stone Road, MS #6511, Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400.
(12) Surface water data with values below the
applicable practical quantification limit (PQL) or method detection limit (MDL)
shall be assessed in accordance with paragraphs
62-4.246(6)(b) and
(c), and subsection
62-303.320(8),
F.A.C. Results reported by a laboratory with the "U" data qualifier code
according to paragraphs
62-160.340(3)(b) and
(c), F.A.C., shall be assessed as half the
reported result or half the criterion, whichever is lower.
(a) If sampling entities want to ensure that
their data will be considered for evaluation, they should review the
Department's list of approved MDLs and PQLs developed pursuant to Rule
62-4.246, F.A.C., and, if
available, use approved analytical methods with MDLs below the applicable water
quality criteria. If there are no approved methods with MDLs below a criterion,
then the method with the lowest MDL should be used. Analytical results listed
as below detection or below the MDL shall not be used for developing Planning
Lists if the MDL was above the criteria and there were, at the time of sample
collection, approved analytical methods with MDLs below the criteria on the
Department's list of approved MDLs and PQLs.
(b) If appropriate analytical methods were
used, then data with values below the applicable MDL will be deemed to meet the
applicable water quality criterion and data with values between the MDL and PQL
will be deemed to be equal to the MDL.
(13) It should be noted that the data
requirements of this rule constitute the minimum data set needed to assess a
water segment for impairment. Agencies or groups designing monitoring networks
are encouraged to consult with the Department to determine the sample design
appropriate for their specific monitoring goals.
(14) A water segment shall be placed on the
Planning List for DO impairment if there has been a statistically significant
decreasing trend in DO levels or increasing trend in the range of daily DO
fluctuations over the planning period at the 90 percent confidence level using
a one-sided Seasonal Kendall test for trend, as described in Helsel, D.R. and
R.M. Hirsch, 2002, Statistical Methods in Water Resources, USGS, pages 338
through 340 (
http://www.flrules.org/Gateway/reference.asp?No=Ref-02962),
which are incorporated by reference herein, after controlling for or removing
the effects of confounding variables, such as climatic and hydrologic cycles,
quality assurance issues, and changes in analytical methods, and except as
provided for under Rules
62-302.300 and
62-4.242, F.A.C. A copy of pages
338 through 340 may be obtained by writing to the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS #6511, Tallahassee, FL
32399-2400.
(15) For assessment of
the 30-day average total ammonia criterion, the monthly average total ammonia
shall be calculated for a station using a minimum of four samples collected
within the month. A water segment shall be placed on the Planning List for
potential total ammonia impairment if a station within the segment has a
monthly average value above the 30-day average criterion in the planning
period.