Fla. Admin. Code Ann. R. 62-303.430 - Biological Impairment
(1) All
Biological Health Assessments used to list a water on the Verified List shall
be conducted and interpreted in accordance with Chapter 62-160, F.A.C.,
including Department-approved Standard Operating Procedures and Department
documents that are incorporated by reference in Chapter 62-160, F.A.C., for the
SCI, LVI, and Shannon-Weaver Diversity Index.
(2) If the water met the requirements for
placement on the Planning List based on Biological Health Assessment results,
the water shall be determined to be biologically impaired if any of the
following conditions occur, given a minimum sample size of two temporally
independent bioassessments:
(a) The average
score of all the SCIs is below 40, or either of the two most recent temporally
independent SCI scores is less than 35. If there are only two SCIs and the
difference between the two scores is greater than 20 points, then an additional
SCI shall be required and the average of all three scores shall be
used.
(b) The average score of all
the temporally independent LVIs is below 43 for a lake segment. If there are
only two LVIs for a lake segment and the difference between the two scores is
greater than 20 points, then an additional LVI shall be required and the
average of all three scores shall be used.
(c) The historic maximum SCI value, as
defined in subsection
62-303.330(4),
F.A.C., is above 64 and the average of the two most recent temporally
independent SCI scores is 20 or more points below the historic maximum
value.
(d) The historic maximum
value LVI, as defined in subsection
62-303.330(4),
F.A.C., is above 78 and the average of the two most recent temporally
independent LVI scores is 20 or more points below the historic maximum
value.
(e) The average score of at
least two temporally independent Shannon-Weaver Diversity Indices is less than
75 percent of the average score from an appropriate control site, pursuant to
subsection 62-302.530(10),
F.A.C.
(3) If the water
was listed on the Planning List based on BioRecon data, two or more temporally
independent SCIs shall be conducted. If the water segment was listed on the
Planning List based on other information specified in subsection
62-303.330(6),
F.A.C., indicating biological impairment, two or more temporally independent
Biological Health Assessments appropriate for the waterbody type shall be
conducted in the waterbody segment to verify whether the water is impaired. If
available, the Department shall consider other scientifically credible
biological assessment methods in predominantly marine waters to verify that the
water is biologically impaired. Results from these biological assessments shall
be evaluated in accordance with subsection
62-303.430(2),
F.A.C., as applicable.
(4) If a
waterbody was listed on the Planning List based on failure of the
Shannon-Weaver Diversity Index under subsection
62-302.530(10),
F.A.C., a minimum of two Biological Health Assessments shall be conducted in
accordance with the methodology in Rule
62-303.330, F.A.C., to verify
whether the water is impaired. If an SCI or LVI is not applicable for the
waterbody type, then the Biological Health Assessment shall be the
Shannon-Weaver Diversity Index or other scientifically credible
method.
(5) Following verification
that a waterbody is biologically impaired, a waterbody shall be included on the
Verified List for biological impairment if:
(a) There are water quality data reasonably
demonstrating the particular pollutant(s) causing the impairment and the
concentration of the pollutant(s); and,
(b) One of the following demonstrations is
made:
1. If there is a numeric criterion for
the specified pollutant(s) in Chapter 62-302, F.A.C., but the criterion is met,
an identification of the specific factors that reasonably demonstrate why the
numeric criterion is not adequate to protect water quality and how the specific
pollutant is causing the impairment, or
2. If there is not a numeric criterion for
the specified pollutant(s) in Chapter 62-302, F.A.C., an identification of the
specific factors that reasonably demonstrate how the particular pollutant(s)
are associated with the observed biological effect. If the numeric
interpretation of the narrative nutrient criterion in paragraph
62-302.531(2)(c),
F.A.C., is exceeded, then nutrients shall be identified as the causative
pollutant unless a stressor identification study links the adverse biological
effects to causal factor(s) other than nutrients.
(6) If a waterbody is verified as
biologically impaired, but a causative pollutant has not been identified, the
waterbody shall be included on the Study List.
Notes
Rulemaking Authority 403.061, 403.067 FS. Law Implemented 403.062, 403.067 FS.
New 6-10-02, Amended 12-11-06, 7-2-12, 2-17-16.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.