Fla. Admin. Code Ann. R. 62-625.700 - Fundamentally Different Factors Variance
(1) In establishing categorical pretreatment
standards for existing sources, the EPA takes into account all the information
it can collect, develop and solicit regarding the factors relevant to
pretreatment standards under Section 307(b) of the CWA. In some cases,
information which may affect these pretreatment standards will not be available
or, for other reasons, will not be considered during their development. As a
result, it may be necessary on a case-by-case basis to adjust the limits in
categorical pretreatment standards, making them either more or less stringent,
as they apply to a certain industrial user within an industrial category or
subcategory. This will only be done if data specific to that industrial user
indicates it presents factors fundamentally different from those considered by
EPA in developing the limit at issue. Any interested person or industrial user
believing that factors relating to an industrial user are fundamentally
different from the factors considered during development of a categorical
pretreatment standard applicable to that industrial user and further, that the
existence of those factors justifies a different discharge limit than specified
in the applicable categorical pretreatment standard, may request a
fundamentally different factors variance under this rule or such a variance
request may be initiated by the EPA.
(2) Criteria.
(a) General criteria. A request for a
variance based upon fundamentally different factors shall be approved only if:
1. There is an applicable categorical
pretreatment standard which specifically controls the pollutant for which
alternative limits have been requested,
2. Factors relating to the discharge
controlled by the categorical pretreatment standards are fundamentally
different from the factors considered by EPA in establishing the pretreatment
standards; and,
3. The request for
a variance is made in accordance with the procedural requirements in
subsections (6) and (7), below.
(b) Criteria applicable to less stringent
limits. A variance request for the establishment of limits less stringent than
required by the pretreatment standard shall be approved only if:
1. The alternative limit requested is no less
stringent than justified by the fundamental difference;
2. The alternative limit will not result in a
violation of prohibitive discharge standards prescribed by or established under
Rule 62-625.400, F.A.C.;
3. The alternative limit will not result in a
non-water quality environmental impact (including energy requirements)
fundamentally more adverse than the impact considered during development of the
pretreatment standards; and,
4.
Compliance with the pretreatment standards (either by using the technologies
upon which the pretreatment standards are based or by using other control
alternatives) would result in either:
a. A
removal cost (adjusted for inflation) wholly out of proportion to the removal
cost considered during development of the pretreatment standards; or
b. A non-water quality environmental impact
(including energy requirements) fundamentally more adverse than the impact
considered during development of the pretreatment
standards.
(c)
Criteria applicable to more stringent limits. A variance request for the
establishment of limits more stringent than required by the pretreatment
standards shall be approved only if:
1. The
alternative limit request is no more stringent than justified by the
fundamental difference; and,
2.
Compliance with the alternative limit would not result in either:
a. A removal cost (adjusted for inflation)
wholly out of proportion to the removal cost considered during development of
the pretreatment standards; or
b. A
non-water quality environmental impact (including energy requirements)
fundamentally more adverse than the impact considered during development of the
pretreatment standards.
(3) Factors considered fundamentally
different. Factors which shall be considered fundamentally different are:
(a) The nature or quality of pollutants
contained in the raw waste load of the industrial user's process
wastewater;
(b) The volume of the
industrial user's process wastewater and effluent discharged;
(c) Non-water quality environmental impact of
control and treatment of the industrial user's raw waste load;
(d) Energy requirements of the application of
control and treatment technology;
(e) Age, size, land availability, and
configuration as they relate to the industrial user's equipment or facilities;
processes employed; process changes; and engineering aspects of the application
of control technology; and,
(f)
Cost of compliance with required control technology.
(4) Factors which will not be considered
fundamentally different. A variance request or portion of such a request under
this section shall not be granted on any of the following ground:
(a) The feasibility of installing the
required waste treatment equipment within the time the CWA allows;
(b) The assertion that the pretreatment
standards cannot be achieved with the appropriate waste treatment facilities
installed, if such assertion is not based on factors listed in subsection (3),
above;
(c) The industrial user's
ability to pay for the required waste treatment; or
(d) The impact of a discharge on the quality
of the WWF's receiving waters.
(5) State or local law. Nothing in this
section shall be construed to impair the right of the State of Florida or any
locality to impose more stringent limitations than required by Federal
law.
(6) Application deadline.
(a) Requests for a variance and supporting
information must be submitted in writing to the Department.
(b) In order to be considered, a request for
a variance must be submitted no later than 180 days after the date on which a
categorical pretreatment standard is published in the Federal
Register.
(c) Where the industrial
user has requested a categorical determination pursuant to subsection
62-625.410(2),
F.A.C., the industrial user may elect to wait for the results of the category
determination before submitting a variance request under this section. Where
the industrial user so elects, it must submit the variance request within 30
days after a final decision has been made on the categorical determination
pursuant to paragraph
62-625.410(2)(d),
F.A.C.
(7) Application
contents. Written submissions for variance requests must include:
(a) The name and address of the person making
the request;
(b) Identification of
the interest of the requester which is affected by the categorical pretreatment
standard for which the variance is requested;
(c) Identification of the WWF currently
receiving the wastewater from the industrial user for which alternative
discharge limits are requested;
(d)
Identification of the categorical pretreatment standards which are applicable
to the industrial user;
(e) A list
of each pollutant or pollutant parameter for which an alternative discharge
limit is sought;
(f) The
alternative discharge limits proposed by the requester for each pollutant or
pollutant parameter identified in paragraph (e), above;
(g) A description of the industrial user's
existing wastewater treatment facilities;
(h) A schematic flow representation of the
industrial user's water system including water supply, process wastewater
systems, and points of discharge; and,
(i) A statement of facts clearly establishing
why the variance request should be approved, including detailed support data,
documentation, and evidence necessary to fully evaluate the merits of the
request (e.g., technical and economic data collected by the EPA and used in
developing each pollutant discharge limit in the pretreatment
standard.)
(8) Deficient
applications. The Department will only act on written requests for variances
that contain all of the information required. Persons who have made incomplete
applications will be notified by the Department that their requests are
deficient and will be given thirty days, from the date of the notification, to
remedy the deficiency. If the deficiency is not corrected within the time
period allowed by the Department, the request for a variance shall be
denied.
(9) Public notice. Upon
receipt of a complete request, the Department will provide notice of receipt,
opportunity to review the submission, and opportunity to comment.
(a) The public notice shall be circulated in
a manner designed to inform interested and potentially interested persons of
the request. Procedures for the circulation of public notice shall include
mailing notices to:
1. The applicable control
authority and the WWF into which the industrial user requesting the variance
discharges;
2. Adjoining states
whose waters may be affected; and,
3. All Federal and State agencies with
jurisdiction over fish, shellfish and wildlife resources, and over coastal zone
management plans. Those agencies include the U.S. Council on Historic
Preservation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the
National Marine Fisheries Service, the Florida Department of State, Division of
Historical Resources, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission,
the Florida Department of Community Affairs, the unit of local government
having jurisdiction over the area where the WWF is located, and any other
person or group who has requested individual notice, including those on
appropriate mailing lists.
(b) The public notice shall provide for a
period not less than 30 days following the date of the public notice during
which time interested persons may review the request and submit their written
views on the request.
(c) Following
the comment period, the Department will make a determination on the request
taking into consideration any comments received. Notice of this final decision
shall be provided to the requester (and the industrial user for which the
variance is requested if different), the control authority, the WWF into which
the industrial user discharges and all persons who submitted comments on the
request.
(10) Review of
requests by the state.
(a) Where the
Department finds that fundamentally different factors do not exist, it shall
deny the request and notify the requester (and industrial user where they are
not the same), the control authority and the WWF of the denial.
(b) Where the Department finds that
fundamentally different factors do exist, it shall forward the request, with a
recommendation that the request be approved, to the EPA Administrator (or
delegate).
(11) Review of
requests by EPA.
(a) Where the EPA
Administrator (or delegate) finds that fundamentally different factors do not
exist, he or she shall deny the request for a variance and send a copy of his
or her determination to the Department, the control authority, the WWF, and the
requester (and to the industrial user, where they are not the same).
(b) Where the EPA Administrator (or delegate)
finds that fundamentally different factors do exist, and that a partial or full
variance is justified, he or she will approve the variance. In approving the
variance, the EPA Administrator (or delegate) will:
1. Prepare recommended alternative discharge
limits for the industrial user either more or less stringent than those
prescribed by the applicable categorical pretreatment standards to the extent
warranted by the demonstrated fundamentally different factors:
2. Provide the following information in his
written determination;
a. The recommended
alternative discharge limits for the industrial user concerned;
b. The rationale for the adjustment of the
pretreatment standard (including the reasons for recommending that the variance
be granted) and an explanation of how the recommended alternative discharge
limits were derived;
c. The
supporting evidence submitted to the EPA Administrator (or delegate); and,
d. Other information considered by
the EPA Administrator (or delegate) in developing the recommended alternative
discharge limits;
3.
Notify the Department, the control authority, and the WWF of his or her
determination; and,
4. Send the
information described in subparagraphs (b)1. and 2., above, to the requester
(and to the industrial user where they are not the
same).
(12)
Request for hearing.
(a) Within 30 days
following the date of receipt of the notice of the decision of the EPA
Administrator's delegate on a variance request, the requester or any other
interested person may submit a petition to the EPA Regional Administrator for a
hearing to reconsider or contest the decision. If such a request is submitted
by a person other than the industrial user, the person shall simultaneously
serve a copy of the request on the industrial user.
(b) If the EPA Regional Administrator
declines to hold a hearing and the EPA Regional Administrator affirms the
findings of the EPA Administrator's delegate, the requester may submit a
petition for a hearing to the EPA Administrator within 30 days of the EPA
Regional Administrator's decision.
Notes
Rulemaking Authority 403.061(7), (31), 403.0885 FS. Law Implemented 403.0885 FS.
New 11-29-94, Amended 1-8-97, 5-10-10.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.