Fla. Admin. Code Ann. R. 62S-2.072 - Application Requirements and Processing
The Department shall approve applications for program grants in order of priority until all program funds are depleted under the following standards and criteria:
(1) Eligible
Applicants. All local governmental entities and state or federal agencies,
federally or state recognized Indian tribal governments which have the legal
responsibility for the provision of outdoor recreational sites and facilities
for the use and benefit of the public, and organizations registered as active
Florida nonprofit corporations which have an agreement with a governmental
agency to develop public lands, are eligible to submit RTP
applications.
(2) Project
Eligibility.
(a) Purpose: RTP grants shall
only be awarded to grantees for projects that are for the primary purpose of
providing recreational trails for the public. Projects must be designed to
comply with paragraph
260.016(1)(e),
F.S., and the Guidance.
(b)
Eligible Site: The site of a proposed RTP project shall be on public lands. The
site shall be owned by the applicant or government on or before the closing
date of the application submission period. A site not owned by the applicant or
government shall be under the applicant's or government's control by a 99-year
lease or similar control, such that the applicant has the legal ability to
dedicate and manage the site for public recreational trail use pursuant to
subsections 62S-2.076(1) and
(2), F.A.C. School board property used
primarily for educational or school related purposes is not eligible. In
addition, nonprofit corporations must provide a letter from the land owner or
managing agency stating that it supports the project and will abide by the
compliance requirements of this rule, and the Guidance.
(c) Number of applications: The maximum
number of applications an applicant may submit shall be as follows: local
governments may submit one (1); consolidated city-county government may submit
two (2); nonprofit corporations may submit one (1); state and federal agencies
may submit one (1) per district.
(d) Active Projects: A grantee with two
incomplete RTP projects by the closing date of an application submission period
shall not be eligible to apply.
(e)
Duplicate Projects: RTP funds shall not be approved for completion of an
incomplete RTP project.
(3) Permissible Uses of Funds.
(a) Maintenance or renovation of existing
trails.
(b) Development or
renovation of trailside or trailhead facilities or trail linkages.
(c) Purchase of trail construction or
maintenance equipment.
(d)
Construction of new trails on local and state lands.
(e) Construction of new trails crossing
federal lands, must be:
1. Permissible under
other law,
2. Necessary and
required by the SCORP that is required by the Land and Water Conservation Fund
Act of 1965 and Chapter 375, F.S., and that is in effect; and,
3. Approved by each federal agency having
jurisdiction over the affected lands under such terms and conditions as the
head, or designee, of the federal agency determines to be appropriate; except
that the approval shall be contingent upon compliance by the Federal agency
with all applicable laws.
(f) Operation of educational programs to
promote safety and environmental protection which specifically relate to the
uses of recreational trails, to the extent the Department has not chosen to use
the educational funds in whole or in part, to further a statewide goal of the
Greenways and Trails Plan. Any unused funds will be made available to
applicants in that funding year's grant submission cycle.
(4) Prohibited Uses.
(a) Condemnation of real property.
(b) Construction of recreational trails for
motorized use on U.S. Forest Service land unless the land is designated for
motorized use and such construction is consistent with the approved U.S. Forest
Service land resource management plan, a copy of which may be obtained from the
U.S. Forest Service, 325 John Knox Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32303.
(c) Facilitating motorized trails on
otherwise nonmotorized trail areas.
(d) Construction or expansion of existing
trails for motorized vehicles on state owned property unless such use is
consistent with the land management plan required by Section
253.034, F.S., for the
site.
(e) Trail planning, except
when performed by the Department using the administrative funds portion of the
State's allocation.
(f) Upgrading,
expanding, or otherwise facilitating motorized use or access to recreational
trails predominantly used by nonmotorized recreational trail users and on
which, as of May 1, 1991, motorized use was prohibited or had not
occurred.
(5) Eligibility
Determination. Following closure of the application submission period,
Department staff shall review and determine the eligibility of each applicant
based on the following:
(a) Deficiency
Documentation: The applicant may retain eligibility by submitting all
documentation missing from or not clear in the application within fifteen
working days from the date of the Department's written notification which
identifies each missing or unclear item.
(b) Ineligibility: An application, in whole
or in part, may be declared ineligible by the Department or the RTP Advisory
Committee pursuant to paragraphs
62S-2.073(2)(a)
-(l), (3)(a)-(b) and (4)(a)-(b), F.A.C. If a portion of the project application
is determined to be ineligible, the applicant will be notified and given 15
working days to revise the ineligible portion. If the ineligible portion still
does not meet the subparagraphs stated herein, the ineligible portion shall be
severed or, if not severable, the application shall be
rejected.
(6) Application
Evaluation. Each eligible application shall be evaluated on the basis of the
information provided in the application in accordance with this part. Each
application shall be assigned a total point score pursuant to subsection
62S-2.072(7),
F.A.C. A project site or facility would not be considered viable if the project
does not receive a minimum number of 55 points for motorized projects, 55
points for nonmotorized projects, 61 points for mixed-use projects, and 61
points for education projects, as awarded under Section
62S-2.073, F.A.C. An application
with fewer than the required minimum points will not be recommended for
funding.
(7) Priority Lists. A
total point score shall be assigned to each application upon evaluation of each
project under Section
62S-2.073, F.A.C. The RTP
Advisory Committee shall prepare one priority list for each category.
Applications shall be ranked on the priority list according to assigned point
scores. The application with the highest score will receive the highest rank.
The funds used for the project shall reduce that particular category's
allocation accordingly. The remaining applications will be arranged in
descending order according to their assigned point scores. Applications scoring
below the minimum, established pursuant to subsection
62S-2.072(6),
F.A.C., shall not be placed on the priority list. The priority list shall
include recommendations for distribution of available program funds. In the
event there are insufficient applications to account for all program funds
assigned to motorized or nonmotorized category, the RTP Advisory Committee may
vote to move funds from one category to another. In order to determine whether
or not to move funds between motorized and nonmotorized categories, the RTP
Advisory Committee shall meet and shall make a determination that there are
insufficient applications to use all funds available in that category for that
year, and that there is a likelihood that there will be an insufficient amount
of applications expected for the next submission cycle.
(8) Tie-Breaker System. If two or more
applications receive the same score, the following tie-breaker system will be
used to decide the priority ranking among them. Tied applications will be
evaluated according to the tie-breaker system in order and will be assigned
their priority accordingly. Funding History. An order of priority among those
applications with equal scores shall be established based on the amount of
funds previously received by the applicant through RTP during the previous five
fiscal years. This includes funds received under the program's previous name of
National Recreational Trails Funding Program. The application from the
applicant which received the lowest amount of program funds receives the
highest priority. Other tied applications will be arranged in descending order
related inversely to the amount of program funds each has received.
(9) Unsettled Claims. The Department shall
deny or suspend program eligibility to any applicant or grantee against which
the Department has an unsettled financial claim related to noncompliance with
terms or conditions of an RTP or other DEP outdoor recreation grant.
(10) Unfunded and Ineligible Applications.
Any unfunded or ineligible applications shall be returned to the applicant upon
written request from the applicant. If no such request is made within 30 days
after notification of grant awards, unfunded applications shall be discarded by
staff.
(11) Application Form. The
Recreational Trails Program Application Form, OGT-10, effective date May 1,
2001, which shall be used for all applications, is hereby incorporated by
reference and is available from the Department's Office of Greenways and
Trails, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station #795, Tallahassee, Florida
32399-3000, (850)488-3701.
Notes
Rulemaking Authority 260.016(1)(h) FS. Law Implemented 260.016(1)(d), (f), (h), (2)(a)2. FS.
New 5-1-01.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.